-
256 F.2d 410·
5th Cir.·
1958-06-17
·cited 52×
The court held that the district court's order granting broad injunctive relief and mandating a special shareholder meeting was improper, exceeding its equity powers and the scope of a preliminary injunction.
-
200 F.2d 420·
9th Cir.·
1952-11-06
·cited 32×
The court held that the lower court had jurisdiction to award interim attorneys' fees from impounded funds, as the funds were subject to claims by parties who benefited from the attorneys' services.
-
130 Fla. 492·
Fla.·
1938-01-05
·cited 32×
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision that allowed a mortgagor in default to avoid foreclosure by offering to place mortgaged property in a trust deed arrangement. The court held that courts of equity lack authority to grant relief from mortgage foreclosure
-
196 F.2d 336·
9th Cir.·
1952-04-02
·cited 22×
-
151 F.2d 720·
8th Cir.·
1945-10-09
·cited 20×
The court held that the defendant bank, by accepting checks payable to itself and crediting them to the personal account of the drawer's president without inquiry, failed to meet the duty of care required under federal law, and thus could not claim estoppel.
-
826 F.2d 1400·
5th Cir.·
1987-08-27
·cited 17×
The court held that the Bank Board's appointment of FSLIC as receiver for Western Savings was supported by the administrative record and reviewed under the arbitrary and capricious standard, not de novo.
-
284 F.2d 274·
D.C. Cir.·
1960-10-20
·cited 16×
The court held that the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's decision to grant a charter to one applicant over another, without a comparative hearing, was within its discretion and not subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
-
248 F.2d 804·
7th Cir.·
1957-10-21
·cited 16×
Federal district courts lack original jurisdiction to entertain an information in the nature of quo warranto, except as specifically provided by statute.
-
512 F.2d 147·
7th Cir.·
1975-03-04
·cited 12×
Federal Home Loan Bank Board's Bylaw (g) preempts any federal common law right of members to inspect or copy a federal savings and loan association's membership list, and the bylaw is a reasonable and constitutional means of communication.
-
557 F.2d 751·
10th Cir.·
1977-06-27
·cited 9×
The court held that the statutory remedy for reviewing the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's approval of a conversion plan is exclusive, precluding a collateral attack under SEC Rule 10b-5.
-
504 F.2d 826·
6th Cir.·
1974-10-17
·cited 8×
The court held that the defendant savings and loan association did not violate federal law by commingling escrow funds and retaining investment earnings, nor by collecting amounts for escrow that were not precisely one-twelfth of estimated annual charges.
-
386 F.2d 42·
9th Cir.·
1967-08-18
·cited 8×
The court held that the district court lacked the power to substitute new distribution provisions for an administratively approved merger plan without the required state and federal administrative approvals.
-
266 F.2d 246·
7th Cir.·
1959-05-06
·cited 8×
The appeal was dismissed as untimely because the notice of appeal was filed more than sixty days after the entry of the final judgment. The order denying attorneys' fees was affirmed.
-
241 F.2d 103·
7th Cir.·
1957-01-23
·cited 8×
The court held that the indictment was not defective because it correctly charged the robbery of a federal savings and loan association, and did not need to allege insurance status.
-
149 So. 2d 891·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1963-02-06
·cited 6×
Shareholders of a federal savings and loan association sought to enjoin directors from management, invalidate proxies, and recover damages for alleged mismanagement. The court held that while state courts lack jurisdiction over internal management matters reserved to federal regu
-
591 F.2d 223·
3d Cir.·
1979-01-15
·cited 5×
The court held that a recent amendment to the National Bank Act validated the Comptroller's action in limiting a national bank's operations to trust company business, requiring reversal of the district court's judgment. The court also reinstated claims against other defendants fo
-
959 F.2d 955·
Fed. Cir.·
1992-03-24
·cited 4×
The court held that the appointment of the RTC as conservator and receiver, and the subsequent liquidation of assets, did not constitute a compensable taking under the Fifth Amendment because the regulated nature of the savings and loan industry and Saratoga's voluntary participa
-
153 F.2d 678·
6th Cir.·
1946-02-09
·cited 4×
A suit brought by the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation, an instrumentality of the United States, against a bank for fraudulent misrepresentation and conversion of funds, arises under federal law and thus falls within federal court jurisdiction.
-
128 F.2d 705·
8th Cir.·
1942-06-05
·cited 4×
A contract entered into by a federal savings and loan association that is beyond its corporate powers (ultra vires) is void and cannot be ratified or enforced through estoppel.
-
524 F. Supp. 175·
M.D. Fla.·
1981-09-01
·cited 3×
The court held that the 'due-on-sale' clause in a federally chartered savings and loan association's mortgage is enforceable under federal law and preempts state law.
-
778 F.2d 1447·
10th Cir.·
1985-11-26
·cited 2×
Federal regulations governing federally chartered savings institutions preempt state laws that prohibit the use of the word 'bank' in advertising, as such state laws directly conflict with federal law under the Supremacy Clause.
-
686 F.2d 953·
D.C. Cir.·
1979-04-20
·cited 2×
Agency regulations authorizing certain fund transfer systems are set aside as they violate existing statutes, despite the technological advancements and competitive pressures driving their adoption.
-
130 F.2d 387·
8th Cir.·
1942-08-19
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish that sales were made to the defendant savings and loan association or in reliance on its credit, thus affirming the trial court's judgment.
-
883 F. Supp. 678·
M.D. Fla.·
1995-04-28
The court held that Florida's Depositor Preference Statute, Fla. Stat. § 658.84, applies to all distributions made after its enactment, regardless of when the financial institution entered receivership.
-
995 F.2d 611·
5th Cir.·
1993-07-19
The court held that the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine bars fraudulent inducement claims against the FDIC, but vacated summary judgment on legal malpractice claims for the Five Investors and the RTC, remanding for further factual determination on the existence of an attorney-client rela
-
922 F.2d 1251·
6th Cir.·
1991-01-07
The court held that the employment contracts, negotiated by FSLIC and deemed necessary to remedy the thrift's unsafe condition, were not automatically terminated by regulation, and thus the officers were entitled to severance benefits.
-
572 F. Supp. 997·
S.D. Fla.·
1983-09-09
The court held that the FHLBB's decision to appoint a receiver was an abuse of discretion, and that the constitutional claims were cognizable in this action.