18,787 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 3,112 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
128 Fla. 247·
Fla.·
1937-05-20
·cited 3×
This habeas corpus case addresses whether a conviction based on an information filed by an Assistant County Solicitor is void. The court held that any defect in the filing is waived if not objected to at the proper time, and thus does not warrant release via habeas corpus.
-
127 Fla. 461·
Fla.·
1937-03-16
·cited 3×
Stephen Elmore Roberts sought habeas corpus relief challenging his indictment under Section 7263 C.G.L., but the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's remand, holding that habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy to challenge defective indictments and that the petiti
-
127 Fla. 451·
Fla.·
1937-03-13
·cited 3×
This habeas corpus case examines whether a state livestock board's resolution to kill wild deer for cattle tick eradication conflicts with state laws protecting game. The court found that the later, more specific game protection laws superseded the board's implied authority.
-
126 Fla. 869·
Fla.·
1937-01-18
·cited 3×
In this habeas corpus proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the validity of an information charging breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit false imprisonment. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that the information failed to charge a felony,
-
125 Fla. 442·
Fla.·
1936-10-12
·cited 3×
In this original habeas corpus proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court rejected petitioner Dick Waldrop's claim that he was sentenced without a judgment of conviction, finding that certified court records conclusively established both a jury verdict of guilty and a formal judgment
-
125 Fla. 433·
Fla.·
1936-10-12
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court reviewed a lower court's decision in a habeas corpus proceeding concerning a city ordinance that required individuals playing coin-operated machines to register personal information. The Court held the ordinance was an unreasonable exercise of police pow
-
122 Fla. 830·
Fla.·
1936-02-19
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court discharged three men held under an indictment for obtaining tax sale certificates by false pretenses from the City of Miami. The court found the indictment failed to charge any offense under Florida law because it did not adequately allege a false repres
-
122 Fla. 669·
Fla.·
1935-11-27
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition, remanding the petitioner to custody. The court relied on prior decisions and allowed the petitioner to raise a defense regarding the unconstitutionality of the statute under which he was charged, if that statute's unco
-
121 Fla. 457·
Fla.·
1935-10-26
·cited 3×
Robert J. Wells seeks habeas corpus relief from a contempt conviction for failure to pay temporary alimony ordered in his divorce case, arguing the trial court lacked jurisdiction because he had obtained a prior Mexican divorce and the court never determined the marital status be
-
120 Fla. 836·
Fla.·
1935-09-16
·cited 3×
In this original habeas corpus proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court held that a woman charged with perjury for making false statements in an affidavit submitted with a marriage license application was lawfully detained, as the affidavit was authorized by law when required by the
-
120 Fla. 747·
Fla.·
1935-09-02
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court upheld the validity of a municipal ordinance adopted by Lakeland prohibiting the possession of intoxicating liquors within the city, finding it a valid exercise of municipal police powers to enforce state prohibition laws in a dry county. The Court rejec
-
117 Fla. 299·
Fla.·
1934-11-22
·cited 3×
J. J. Mendenhall sought writs of error from the Florida Supreme Court challenging two Circuit Court judgments in habeas corpus proceedings that remanded him to custody to await trial on murder charges. The Supreme Court granted the writs of error and scire facias audiendum errore
-
117 Fla. 210·
Fla.·
1934-11-09
·cited 3×
This habeas corpus case concerns the legality of an imprisonment order for contempt. The petitioner failed to file a brief supporting his discharge, leading the court to dismiss the proceedings.
-
113 Fla. 471·
Fla.·
1934-01-08
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court granted a writ of habeas corpus, releasing a petitioner held on a homicide charge after grand juries twice declined to indict him, finding the evidence insufficient for probable guilt.
-
111 Fla. 584·
Fla.·
1933-08-02
·cited 3×
Young Ferris challenged his imprisonment via habeas corpus, arguing his sentence was void because it lacked a proper judgment of conviction. The Florida Supreme Court agreed and remanded him for resentencing after entry of a proper judgment of conviction.
-
111 Fla. 579·
Fla.·
1933-07-28
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court upheld the validity of an information and judgment convicting Johnnie Taylor of robbery, rejecting his habeas corpus challenge that the information was defective and that no valid judgment of conviction existed. The court affirmed that both the informati
-
110 Fla. 457·
Fla.·
1933-06-10
·cited 3×
In this writ of error case, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the Circuit Court's denial of habeas corpus relief to William Hines, who was re-arrested 78 days after posting a supersedeas bond pending appeal of his municipal court conviction. The court held that municipal court c
-
110 Fla. 373·
Fla.·
1933-06-01
·cited 3×
Perry Acree sought habeas corpus discharge from a murder conviction, arguing the grand jury that indicted him was improperly recalled after the court term had adjourned. The Florida Supreme Court rejected this challenge, holding that the court's recess (not adjournment sine die)
-
106 Fla. 299·
Fla.·
1932-07-27
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision to deny a habeas corpus petition. The court held that a police officer operating a city-owned vehicle without a license tag, despite a dispute over the fee, was in violation of state law and thus lawfully arrested.
-
68 Fla. 23·
Fla.·
1914-06-25
·cited 3×
The Florida Supreme Court held that a General Court Martial had jurisdiction over a commissioned officer of the National Guard and that a conviction of two charges, one valid and one invalid under state law, did not warrant discharge in habeas corpus proceedings where the valid c
-
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as untimely.
-
2025 WL 3442706·
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-16
·cited 2×
The court held that the petitioner is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and is entitled to a bond hearing. The court has jurisdiction and exhaustion of administrative remedies is excused.
-
Richard Barry Randolph was convicted and sentenced to death in 1988 for the brutal murder of a convenience store manager. Following issuance of a death warrant with an execution date of November 20, 2025, Randolph filed his fourth successive postconviction motion raising three cl
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-10
·cited 2×
The court denied the petitioner's motion for reconsideration, finding she failed to present new evidence or demonstrate manifest error of law or fact, and that her arguments were either untimely or legally insufficient.
-
2025 WL 708612·
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-10
·cited 2×
The court denied Petitioner's claims 11, 14, and 16 on the merits, finding no violation of federal law or unreasonable determination of facts by the state court.
-
2008 WL 2782757·
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-20
·cited 2×
The court lacks jurisdiction over the petition for writ of habeas corpus because the petitioner is no longer in custody for the challenged conviction and has previously filed successive petitions. Jurisdiction for a § 2241 petition lies only in the district of confinement.
-
2023 WL 3394161·
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-24
·cited 2×
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider a motion for an extension of time to file a habeas petition when no petition had been filed.
-
The court denied the motion to stay execution, finding no substantial likelihood of success on the merits for the petitioner's claims regarding the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion and his post-judgment motion to amend.
-
2020 WL 4756761·
N.D. Fla.·
2024-10-28
·cited 2×
A prisoner's civil rights complaint challenging the validity of his conviction is barred by Heck v. Humphrey and Preiser v. Rodriguez, and must be dismissed.
-
2015 WL 4651090·
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-26
·cited 2×
The federal district court sua sponte raised concerns about a potential conflict of interest where petitioner's counsel represented him in both state post-conviction Rule 3.850 proceedings and the present federal habeas corpus action. The court stayed the proceedings and ordered
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2024-07-24
·cited 2×
Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Florida Statute section 907.041(5)(b), which prohibits judges from granting nonmonetary pretrial release at first appearance for persons arrested for dangerous crimes including misdemeanor domestic violence. The Third District Court
-
2014 WL 12929717·
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-30
·cited 2×
A district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain a second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus when the petitioner has not obtained prior authorization from the court of appeals.
-
A resentencing order that is nunc pro tunc to the original judgment does not create a 'new judgment' for purposes of filing a second or successive federal habeas corpus petition.
-
371 So. 3d 1002·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2023-09-22
·cited 2×
A successive petition for writ of habeas corpus that fails to establish illegal detention or manifest injustice must be dismissed as unauthorized.
-
A federal prisoner cannot use the § 2241 saving clause to circumvent the bar on second or successive § 2255 motions when the claim arises from a new interpretation of statutory law.
-
Thomas Dale Ferguson, an Alabama death row inmate, challenged his death sentence by arguing that he was intellectually disabled under *Atkins v. Virginia* and that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed
-
66 F.4th 896·
11th Cir.·
2023-04-26
·cited 2×
The Eleventh Circuit held that a death-row prisoner's claim that Florida's clemency process lacked specific standards and was arbitrary did not present a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and thus denied his motion for a stay of execution.
-
2021 WL 3485653·
N.D. Fla.·
2023-04-13
·cited 2×
The court held that a petitioner's subjective belief that administrative remedies were unavailable is insufficient to excuse failure to exhaust, absent credible evidence of affirmative misconduct by prison officials to prevent exhaustion.
-
361 So. 3d 235·
Fla.·
2023-03-16
·cited 2×
The Florida Supreme Court sanctioned inmate LaDon Green for abusing the court's judicial resources through a pattern of fourteen meritless pro se habeas corpus petitions raising the same claims repeatedly. The Court barred him from filing future pleadings related to his convictio
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-17
·cited 2×
The court denied the petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment because it was untimely and, even if construed as a Rule 60(b) motion, failed to show a basis for relief.
-
The Court denied Petitioner's motion for release because the preliminary injunction he relied upon was vacated.
-
2022 WL 1234728·
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-05
·cited 2×
The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances to justify relief from the judgment dismissing his habeas petition as untimely.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-06
·cited 2×
A Certificate of Appealability (COA) shall not issue regarding the denial of the Petitioner's motion to alter and amend judgment.
-
The court held that a federal inmate cannot use a § 2241 petition to challenge his sentence when § 2255 is an adequate remedy.
-
Luis La-Casse filed a frivolous habeas corpus petition in the Florida Third District Court of Appeal, continuing a pattern of meritless pro se filings despite prior warnings. The court ordered La-Casse to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se petit
-
46 Fla. L. Weekly D1065·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-06-25
·cited 2×
Wesley Ward petitioned for habeas corpus relief, challenging his detention without bond after violating conditions of his pretrial release. The court granted the petition, finding that Ward was charged with bondable offenses and the trial court failed to follow statutory procedur
-
317 So. 3d 1207·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-02-24
·cited 2×
Appellate counsel's failure to raise fundamental error in the trial court's omission of the standard jury instruction on reasonable doubt constitutes ineffective assistance of appellate counsel requiring reversal and a new trial.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-02-17
·cited 2×
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision, holding that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for post-conviction relief motions under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
-
310 So. 3d 1051·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-10-28
·cited 2×
The appellate court reversed a lower court's dismissal of a habeas corpus petition. The court agreed that the Department of Corrections improperly reduced the appellant's jail credit, which was contrary to the original plea agreement and sentencing.
-
303 So. 3d 269·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-09-09
·cited 2×
Shird Myrick filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in DeSoto County Circuit Court challenging his grand theft conviction. The circuit court converted the habeas petition to a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and transferred the case to Dade County, where Myr