4,117 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 4,089 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
452 F.2d 1075·
1st Cir.·
1971-12-29
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction, as the petitioner's commanding officer in New Hampshire could still be considered his custodian.
-
The appellate court held that the District Court's factual findings regarding the voluntariness of the guilty plea were supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous.
-
452 F.2d 904·
3d Cir.·
1971-12-22
The court held that conflicting affidavits regarding a prosecutor's comment on the defendant's silence necessitate an evidentiary hearing to determine if a constitutional violation occurred.
-
Dennis Robinson petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging illegal incarceration, claiming he was never informed of his right to appeal. The Florida Supreme Court found a prima facie case for relief and transferred the matter to this appellate court, which appointed a circui
-
The court held that a state prisoner's petition for habeas corpus relief based on ineffective counsel and a coerced guilty plea must be denied when the prisoner fails to refute conflicting evidence regarding his alleged alibi.
-
254 So. 2d 859·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1971-11-30
The court dismissed the untimely appeal but granted the habeas corpus petition to allow full appellate review of the order denying the motion to vacate judgment and sentence.
-
450 F.2d 304·
5th Cir.·
1971-11-04
The court held that the prisoner was denied effective assistance of counsel in the district court and that the case should be remanded for further proceedings.
-
450 F.2d 459·
1st Cir.·
1971-10-28
The court held that while due process requires fundamentally fair parole revocation procedures, it would not extend these procedural safeguards to the petitioner's case given the undisputed factual basis for the revocation.
-
-
Although the appeal was untimely filed based on the order's rendition date, the court treated it as a petition for writ of habeas corpus due to erroneous advice from the juvenile court, allowing for appellate review.
-
448 F.2d 407·
6th Cir.·
1971-09-09
The court held that Ohio's statutory and constitutional procedures for discretionary review did not arbitrarily deny the appellant access to a full review of his non-constitutional evidentiary issue.
-
448 F.2d 130·
2d Cir.·
1971-09-03
The court held that the district court correctly denied the petition without a hearing because the record did not support claims of involuntary confession.
-
-
The court held that even if a jury instruction unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of guilt.
-
447 F.2d 466·
5th Cir.·
1971-08-24
The court held that a state prisoner was not denied his right to a direct appeal when his retained counsel advised him against appealing and he failed to inform state officials of his intent to appeal.
-
446 F.2d 1393·
5th Cir.·
1971-08-23
The district court correctly treated the prisoner's civil rights complaint as a habeas corpus petition and denied it for failure to exhaust state remedies.
-
The court held that the Selective Service Board effectively reopened the appellee's classification, entitling him to a III-A deferment.
-
The district court's findings of constitutional violations were not clearly erroneous, and its grant of a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.
-
445 F.2d 836·
5th Cir.·
1971-07-01
The court held that the lower court's findings of fact were not clearly erroneous and that the state trial court provided a full and fair hearing on the voluntariness of the confession.
-
The appellate court held that the trial court erred in refusing to grant the City of Miami relief from a habeas corpus judgment without justification.
-
The court held that a conflict of interest existed between jointly represented codefendants, denying one effective counsel.
-
442 F.2d 331·
10th Cir.·
1971-05-13
The court held that the issue of denial of a preliminary hearing was not exhausted in state courts and thus could not be considered in federal habeas corpus. The court also found the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to be without merit.
-
443 F.2d 326·
7th Cir.·
1971-05-13
The court held that the district court did not err in finding that the petitioner was properly admonished of the mandatory consecutive nature of his sentence, despite potential ambiguities in the common law record.
-
The court held that the defendant did not make an intelligent and knowing waiver of counsel during his guilty plea, as the trial court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry.
-
441 F.2d 255·
5th Cir.·
1971-04-01
The court held that the district court did not err in denying the petition for habeas corpus.
-
440 F.2d 555·
9th Cir.·
1971-03-29
The appellate court affirmed the district court's order granting habeas corpus, finding the confession involuntary and counsel ineffective.
-
The court held that excluding a juror who stated he never believed in the death penalty and could not be a fair and impartial juror did not violate the petitioner's constitutional right to an impartial jury under Witherspoon.
-
439 F.2d 233·
2d Cir.·
1971-03-15
The court held that the petitioner was not unlawfully inducted and that his father's letter did not constitute a sufficient request for discharge under Army regulations.
-
438 F.2d 1183·
3d Cir.·
1971-03-09
The court held that the relator's challenge to the denial of his habeas corpus petition was without merit.
-
438 F.2d 521·
10th Cir.·
1971-02-26
The court held that the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies by wilfully bypassing them, thus the district court properly denied relief.
-
438 F.2d 926·
10th Cir.·
1971-02-26
The court held that it was error to dismiss the habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies when the petitioner had already raised the same issues on direct appeal.
-
440 F.2d 1259·
5th Cir.·
1971-02-24
-
A state detainer remains valid even when state sentences are ordered to run concurrently with federal sentences, and the prisoner is transferred to federal custody.
-
The court held that the denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was not constitutional error, and any potential error was harmless.
-
The court held that the district court erred in denying the application for habeas corpus or mandamus without notice or a hearing, and without considering evidence presented to it.
-
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the habeas corpus petition, finding it offered a better prospect for relief than the original appeal.
-
Raymond Myrick sought habeas corpus relief alleging he was unconstitutionally deprived of his right to direct appellate review because his court-appointed counsel failed to appeal and the trial court failed to advise him of his appellate rights. The court denied the petition afte
-
-
435 F.2d 852·
9th Cir.·
1970-12-07
A federal prisoner violating parole is not subjected to double jeopardy by serving the unexpired sentence without credit for time on parole, as this is part of the original sentence.
-
241 So. 2d 432·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1970-12-03
The father appealed a habeas corpus decision returning custody of his minor child to the mother based on a prior divorce decree. The court affirmed, holding that a circuit court that issued an original custody decree retains exclusive jurisdiction to modify that order, and a subs
-
434 F.2d 649·
3d Cir.·
1970-12-03
The court held that the district court did not err in denying the habeas corpus petition, as the petitioner's guilty pleas were voluntary and the indictment procedure was proper under state and federal law.
-
The court held that the appellant's guilty plea was valid because the sentencing court was not required to personally explain the potential sentence under the Federal Youth Corrections Act at the time of the 1964 plea, and the McCarthy v. United States decision is not retroactive
-
The court held that the appellant's claim that the justice of the peace was disqualified does not present an extraordinary circumstance justifying a collateral attack on the conviction.
-
433 F.2d 1368·
5th Cir.·
1970-11-03
The appellate court affirmed the denial of the habeas corpus petition, finding no error in the district court's adoption of the state court's findings.
-
432 F.2d 1129·
7th Cir.·
1970-09-30
The court held that the facts were not adequately developed at the state coram nobis hearing, entitling the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing in federal district court on the voluntariness of his confession.
-
-
429 F.2d 1308·
10th Cir.·
1970-08-27
The court held that the federal district court correctly dismissed the habeas petition because the petitioner had not exhausted his available state remedies.
-
238 So. 2d 502·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1970-08-20
The court held that the petitioner's guilt was overwhelmingly established by the record, and no merit was found in the presented assignments of error.
-
238 So. 2d 316·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1970-07-29
The court appointed a commissioner to take testimony on whether the petitioner was wrongfully denied his right to direct appeal, following the precedent of Baggett v. Wainwright that habeas corpus may provide full appellate review when direct appeal rights are denied.
-