Guilt Beyond A Reasonable Doubt

15 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Tatum Duke v. State
  106 Fla. 205· Fla.· 1932-07-15 ·cited 50×
  Tatum Duke was convicted of manslaughter in the negligent and intoxicated operation of an automobile resulting in the death of Hiram Wilkinson. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded for a new trial because the trial court admitted irrelevant and immaterial evidence rega
• Albritton v. State
  32 Fla. 358· Fla.· 1893-06-01 ·cited 50×
  This case reviews a conviction for larceny where the appellant, Henry Albritton, was charged as a principal in the second degree for aiding and abetting his co-defendant, Andrew Albritton. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible error in the trial court
• United States v. Yates
  470 F.2d 968· 10th Cir.· 1972-12-20 ·cited 34×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the government adequately proved the corpus delicti of the crime.
• United States v. Harper
  680 F.2d 731· 11th Cir.· 1982-07-16 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to sever offenses, that an in-court identification was not impermissibly tainted, that the government's attorney did not improperly assist an identification, and that there was sufficient ev
• United States v. Holmes
  453 F.2d 950· 10th Cir.· 1972-01-10 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and that the trial court did not err in refusing a cautionary instruction or in denying a speedy trial claim.
• Burrup v. United States
  371 F.2d 556· 10th Cir.· 1967-01-13 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the trial court's Allen instruction and supplemental instructions on fraud, conspiracy, and circumstantial evidence were not improper.
• Diecidue v. State
  131 So. 2d 7· Fla.· 1961-05-24 ·cited 17×
  Frank Diecidue was convicted of violating Florida's lottery laws based on circumstantial evidence that bolita paraphernalia was found in his home during a raid. The Florida Supreme Court reversed his conviction, holding that the trial judge fundamentally erred by giving a jury in
• United States v. Solem
  646 F.2d 322· 8th Cir.· 1980-06-27 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on self-defense and defense of others, where there was evidence supporting these theories, constituted a denial of due process.
• United States v. Lewellyn Henry and Winston Franklin McNair
  849 F.2d 1534· 5th Cir.· 1988-07-12 ·cited 15×
  The evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict that the appellants knowingly possessed marijuana with intent to distribute and conspired to do so.
• Blum Vestal Johnson and Commie Allen Johnson v. United States
  265 F.2d 496· 4th Cir.· 1959-04-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in overruling the defendants' motions for a directed verdict of acquittal or to set aside the verdict.
• United States v. Brooks
  473 F.2d 817· 9th Cir.· 1973-02-09 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that no plain error occurred regarding evidence not objected to below.
• Carlton Harris v. Louie L. Wainwright
  760 F.2d 1148· 11th Cir.· 1985-05-20 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the application of the confrontation clause rule to the facts of this case was misplaced.
• Jett v. United States
  393 F.2d 139· 5th Cir.· 1968-04-08
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.