-
899 So. 2d 1121·
Fla.·
2005-04-07
·cited 114×
The Florida Supreme Court held that claim file materials in first-party bad faith insurance actions are discoverable despite work product protection, overruling its prior decision in Kujawa and establishing parity between first-party and third-party bad faith discovery rules. The
-
403 F.2d 119·
5th Cir.·
1968-10-30
·cited 86×
The court held that the contempt citation was criminal and therefore appealable, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the production of witness statements under Rule 34's good cause standard.
-
2014 WL 5518669·
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-12
·cited 38×
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the defendant's ISP to identify the defendant before the Rule 26(f) conference.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-08
·cited 18×
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-23
·cited 17×
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause shown.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2026-01-30
Eric Holmes, convicted of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited and sentenced as a habitual offender to 16 years, filed a second postconviction motion in 2025 and simultaneously sought discovery of DNA evidence and complete case files. The court denied his motion to comp
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-20
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery and a temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-21
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to identify the defendant, finding good cause for expedited discovery.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-03
The court held that Paragon Insurance Holdings, LLC failed to demonstrate good cause to compel the forensic collection of additional electronic media under the parties' negotiated protocol.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-07
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause existed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-23
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct limited expedited discovery.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-15
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify an alleged copyright infringer while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-25
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct pre-service discovery and extend the service deadline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-06
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to identify the defendant, subject to procedural protections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-08
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP to identify a defendant prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, subject to certain protections for the subscriber.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-08
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, allowing discovery of the ISP subscriber's identity.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-11
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to identify the defendant, subject to specific procedural protections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-08
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-02-09
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause shown.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-02-07
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify an alleged copyright infringer while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-02-07
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, allowing expedited discovery to identify a defendant based on an IP address.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-05
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-16
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, allowing discovery of the subscriber's identity.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-03
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery is denied because good cause was not established.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-11
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP to identify a defendant prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause but requiring procedural protections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-13
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, allowing discovery of the subscriber's identity associated with a specific IP address.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-03
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-02
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify an alleged infringer while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-03
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the defendant's ISP before a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause established.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-09
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP to identify an alleged copyright infringer.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-30
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve third-party subpoenas prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, finding good cause shown, but imposed procedural protections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-26
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to identify the defendant before the Rule 26(f) conference.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant while imposing procedural safeguards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing expedited discovery to identify an unnamed defendant in a copyright infringement case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the defendant's ISP to identify the defendant, establishing procedural safeguards for the process.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, allowing expedited discovery to identify the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-12
A party seeking to have a third-party videographer present at a compulsory medical examination under Rule 35 must demonstrate good cause and special circumstances, which the plaintiff failed to do.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-24
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify an anonymous defendant in a copyright infringement case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-31
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third-party subpoena, allowing limited discovery to identify the defendant's ISP subscriber information.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-27
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to identify the defendant before the Rule 26(f) conference.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-02
The court granted the Relator's motion for leave to serve subpoenas duces tecum, finding good cause for expedited discovery.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-05
Plaintiff is granted leave to serve a third-party subpoena on the ISP to obtain the subscriber's identity, provided the ISP complies with relevant statutory notice requirements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-07
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for expedited third-party discovery, finding good cause existed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-16
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference, allowing expedited discovery to identify the defendant.