-
474 So. 2d 783·
Fla.·
1985-05-02
·cited 73×
Pioneer Federal sought to enforce a due-on-sale clause in a mortgage against the Reeders who entered into an agreement for deed without lender consent. The Florida Supreme Court held that due-on-sale clauses are enforceable in Florida and that an agreement for deed constitutes a
-
747 F.2d 1536·
6th Cir.·
1984-11-08
·cited 18×
The court held that plaintiff Marx could not assert a private cause of action for violations of 12 C.F.R. § 1.4 under 12 U.S.C. § 93(b) because Congress did not intend to create such a remedy.
-
725 F.2d 1390·
D.C. Cir.·
1984-01-04
·cited 16×
A motion for administrative reconsideration filed after the statutory period for judicial review has expired does not extend that period.
-
448 So. 2d 1127·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1984-04-06
·cited 15×
The court affirmed the trial court's finding that a due-on-sale clause in a private mortgage was unenforceable, but on different grounds, holding that federal law did not preempt Florida's requirement that a mortgagee show impairment of security for such clauses to be enforced in
-
728 F.2d 434·
10th Cir.·
1984-02-21
·cited 12×
The court held that the Board of Governors abused its discretion by attempting to create legislative policy through an adjudicative order regarding Foothill's NOW accounts and commercial loans.
-
917 F.2d 1126·
8th Cir.·
1990-10-29
·cited 2×
The Comptroller of the Currency may interpret the McFadden Act's definition of 'State banks' functionally to include state-chartered savings and loan associations that engage in banking-like activities, even if traditional state banks cannot branch statewide.
-
463 So. 2d 297·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1984-12-11
·cited 2×
The Florida Department of Banking and Finance appealed the denial of a preliminary injunction seeking to stop Standard Federal Savings & Loan Association and K-Mart from marketing deposit accounts through K-Mart retail locations. The court upheld the trial court's denial, holding
-
488 So. 2d 50·
Fla.·
1986-04-10
The court held that incriminating statements made by the appellee to Detective Roxburgh were admissible because his right to remain silent was scrupulously honored and he knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights, reversing the trial court's suppression order in part.
-
463 So. 2d 1202·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1985-01-29
-
456 So. 2d 579·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1984-09-28
The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed a dismissal of a mortgage foreclosure action, holding that a federal savings and loan association could enforce a due-on-sale clause. The court found that the "window period" provision of the Garn-St. Germain Act did not apply to mort
-
710 F.2d 841·
D.C. Cir.·
1983-06-17
The court held that a subsequent congressional act repealed the statute that the lower court relied upon to strike down the DIDC regulation.