Forgery (18 U.S.C. § 495)

12 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. White
  611 F.2d 531· 5th Cir.· 1980-02-06 ·cited 89×
  The court held that sufficient evidence existed to establish territorial jurisdiction and venue, the admission of a Treasury claim form was proper under the residual hearsay exception, and the evidence was sufficient to prove intent to defraud.
• United States v. Maybury
  274 F.2d 899· 2d Cir.· 1960-01-27 ·cited 84×
  The dissenting judge held that retrial on the forgery count is barred by double jeopardy, and retrial on the uttering count is barred by collateral estoppel, requiring dismissal of the indictment.
• United States v. Edmonson
  792 F.2d 1492· 9th Cir.· 1986-07-01 ·cited 45×
  The enactment of Section 510 of the statute effected a partial repeal of Section 495.
• United States v. Hernandez
  730 F.2d 895· 2d Cir.· 1984-03-23 ·cited 40×
  The court held that threats against a witness to obtain evidence are no longer covered by 18 U.S.C. § 1503 after the enactment of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1512.
• United States v. Lilley
  581 F.2d 182· 8th Cir.· 1978-08-09 ·cited 30×
  The court held that the admission of Agent Buchholz's testimony repeating Mr. Lilley's statement was hearsay and not admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(B), and that Mr. Lilley's testimony against appellant violated the marital privilege.
• United States v. Shields
  291 F.2d 798· 6th Cir.· 1961-06-30 ·cited 30×
  A motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 cannot be used to review issues that could have been raised on direct appeal, such as sufficiency of evidence, illegal arrest, or denial of witnesses.
• United States v. Anderson
  618 F.2d 487· 8th Cir.· 1980-04-03 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the defendant's conviction for mail fraud was proper, as the delivery of checks by IRS agents to post offices constituted a mailing under the statute, and that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings regarding a handwriting expert's report and p
• United States v. Corrine Nancy Rivamonte
  666 F.2d 515· 11th Cir.· 1982-01-22 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's convictions for forgery and uttering a forged instrument, and that venue was properly established.
• United States v. Aaron
  457 F.2d 865· 2d Cir.· 1972-03-10 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the unintentional, brief delay in producing a second Jencks Act report was harmless error, as the defense counsel made a tactical decision not to use it for impeachment.
• United States v. Faust
  850 F.2d 575· 9th Cir.· 1988-06-28 ·cited 12×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict Faust of embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 641 and forgery under 18 U.S.C. § 495 for two counts, but vacated one forgery conviction based on precedent regarding agency endorsements.
• Roberts v. United States
  331 F.2d 502· 9th Cir.· 1964-04-27 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the second count of the indictment, charging an attempt to pass a forged endorsement on a U.S. Treasury check, does not state an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 472.