-
917 F.2d 80·
2d Cir.·
1990-10-15
·cited 17×
The court held that the district court had jurisdiction to correct an erroneous sentence and that the upward departure for Uccio's sentencing required reconsideration. The court affirmed Sarantopoulos's conviction, finding his severance motion was properly denied.
-
934 F.2d 1114·
10th Cir.·
1991-05-24
·cited 16×
The court affirmed the defendant's convictions, finding that the joinder of offenses was proper, the evidence was sufficient, and the sentencing calculations were largely correct.
-
897 F.2d 300·
8th Cir.·
1990-01-31
·cited 16×
The court held that while a multiple conspiracy instruction should have been given, its absence did not substantially prejudice the defendants, and other claims of error lacked merit.
-
768 F.2d 1257·
11th Cir.·
1985-08-16
·cited 16×
The court held that there was no fatal variance between the indictment and evidence, joinder of defendants was proper, and various evidentiary rulings were either harmless error or not grounds for reversal.
-
711 F.2d 748·
6th Cir.·
1983-07-14
·cited 16×
The court held that the trial judge did not abuse discretion in denying severance, the speedy trial right was not violated, and the admission of grand jury testimony did not affect substantial rights.
-
406 F.2d 599·
10th Cir.·
1969-01-29
·cited 16×
The court held that entries made to represent fictitious loans or loans to straw-men, even if other bank records might reveal the true nature of the transaction, constitute false entries under 18 U.S.C. § 1005 when made with intent to deceive, and that the indictment was sufficie
-
920 F.2d 1080·
2d Cir.·
1990-12-05
·cited 14×
The court held that the admission of redacted codefendant statements, the denial of severance, and the sufficiency of evidence were not grounds for reversal of the conviction.
-
781 F.2d 1536·
11th Cir.·
1986-02-10
·cited 14×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's convictions for conspiracy and distributing controlled substances, and that the trial court did not err in denying severance or admitting certain testimony.
-
452 F.2d 1007·
9th Cir.·
1971-12-07
·cited 14×
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying a last-minute motion to sever, as it was untimely and waived, and that the joint trial did not prejudice the appellant.
-
853 F.2d 1037·
2d Cir.·
1988-07-14
·cited 12×
The court held that mail fraud and tax fraud charges could be properly joined in a single indictment against multiple defendants under Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b) because the schemes were part of a series of interconnected transactions and the proof of one was indispensable to understandi
-
652 F.2d 972·
10th Cir.·
1981-07-01
·cited 12×
The court held that the indictment was valid, severance was not required, and co-defendant statements were admissible, affirming the convictions.
-
869 F.2d 1288·
9th Cir.·
1989-03-09
·cited 8×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict both defendants, the charges were properly joined, and no reversible errors occurred during the trial.
-
452 F.2d 1133·
9th Cir.·
1971-12-17
·cited 8×
The court held that appellants waived their right to appeal the denial of their severance motion by failing to diligently pursue it below and that evidence admitted against one appellant was properly received.
-
962 F.2d 1332·
8th Cir.·
1992-05-06
·cited 7×
-
991 F.2d 120·
4th Cir.·
1993-04-19
·cited 4×
The court held that a deferred motion to suppress qualifies as a 'pretrial motion' for Speedy Trial Act purposes, and that joinder and sufficiency of evidence claims were without merit.
-
939 F.2d 643·
8th Cir.·
1991-07-29
·cited 4×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to sever, that the defendant lacked standing to suppress evidence seized from a co-arrestee, and that the jury instructions adequately covered the defense's theory.
-
875 F.2d 535·
6th Cir.·
1989-05-18
·cited 4×
The joint indictment and trial violated Rule 8(b) and prejudiced the defendants, requiring severance.
-
833 F.2d 741·
8th Cir.·
1987-11-16
·cited 4×
The court held that the trial judge's jury instructions did not impermissibly amend the indictment, and any misjoinder of defendants was harmless error.
-
763 F.2d 773·
6th Cir.·
1985-05-29
·cited 4×
The court held that the joinder of the mail fraud count against Rosemary Johnson with other counts against co-defendants was proper under Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b) and 14, and that she failed to show sufficient prejudice to warrant severance.
-
364 F.2d 586·
2d Cir.·
1966-07-29
·cited 4×
The court held that a co-defendant's incriminating statement, even if later found to be made by a juvenile, was properly admitted against the adult defendants with limiting instructions, and the discovery of the co-defendant's age post-trial did not invalidate the convictions.
-
76 F. Supp. 2d 1346·
S.D. Fla.·
1999-11-22
The court denied the motion to dismiss for improper venue and the motions for severance, finding that venue for the murder charge was proper and that a joint trial would not cause undue prejudice.
-
926 F. Supp. 1545·
S.D. Fla.·
1996-05-01
The court denied motions to sever, finding that the defendants failed to establish misjoinder or compelling prejudice that would outweigh the public interest in a joint trial.
-
988 F.2d 629·
6th Cir.·
1993-03-11
The court held that the district court did not err in admitting evidence of Weiner's cooperation with the FBI, the results of polygraph examinations, and in denying severance motions, affirming the convictions.
-
971 F.2d 1189·
6th Cir.·
1992-07-27
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions of all defendants and that the trial court did not err in denying motions for severance or in its conduct during the trial.