-
691 F. Supp. 1394·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-08-10
·cited 4×
The court held that the indictment was sufficiently specific, the money laundering statute was not unconstitutionally vague, and the counts were not multiplicious.
-
192 F.2d 498·
9th Cir.·
1951-08-21
·cited 4×
The court held that the trial court's jury instruction erroneously included criminal negligence as an element of bribery, which was prejudicial error requiring reversal.
-
183 F.2d 832·
D.C. Cir.·
1950-06-15
·cited 4×
The court held that an indictment framed under one section of a statute but tried and convicted under another is not grounds for reversal if the defendant was not misled to his prejudice. The court also found the indictment sufficient under the statute and constitutional provisio
-
969 F.2d 187·
6th Cir.·
1992-07-08
·cited 2×
The court held that knowledge of the RCRA permit requirement is not an element of the crime under 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2)(A), and that employees can be held criminally liable under RCRA.
-
684 F.2d 709·
10th Cir.·
1982-08-09
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
-
473 F.2d 1054·
7th Cir.·
1973-01-17
·cited 2×
A conviction for refusing induction must be reversed if the indictment is so vague that it fails to provide reasonable notice of the specific charges, or if the government presents insufficient evidence of guilt.
-
161 F.2d 476·
2d Cir.·
1947-04-18
·cited 2×
The court held that the transactions were illegal non-quota shipments because they constituted direct sales from appellants to retailer Galumbeck, not sales for the account of the wholesalers McCann Co. and Gulotta.
-
982 F.2d 173·
6th Cir.·
1992-12-11
The dissent argues that the indictment was legally sufficient because conspiracy to aid and abet is the same crime as conspiracy to commit the underlying offense.
-
318 F.2d 419·
8th Cir.·
1963-06-12
The court held that the indictment was sufficient and the evidence supported the conviction for embezzlement from a labor organization.
-
256 F.2d 82·
6th Cir.·
1958-06-02
An indictment signed by an assistant United States Attorney is valid and does not require the signature of the United States Attorney.