Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure Rule 30

439 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Hamling
  481 F.2d 307· 9th Cir.· 1973-06-07 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the mailing of obscene advertisements and materials violates federal law and that the trial court did not err in its rulings regarding the indictment, jury selection, or the admission of evidence.
• United States v. Matzker
  473 F.2d 408· 8th Cir.· 1973-02-14 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the circumstantial evidence presented was sufficient for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the credit cards were stolen from the mail.
• United States v. Jones
  464 F.2d 1118· 8th Cir.· 1972-08-14 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient, the evidence supported the conviction for using false documents in a federal matter, and the jury instructions, when viewed as a whole, did not constitute plain error.
• United States v. Knox
  458 F.2d 612· 5th Cir.· 1972-03-14 ·cited 22×
• United States v. Taglianetti
  456 F.2d 1055· 1st Cir.· 1972-03-10 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the defendants' convictions for using extortionate means to collect an extension of credit were supported by sufficient evidence and that the trial court did not err in its rulings or instructions.
• United States v. Reico Lonnie Greene
  442 F.2d 1285· 10th Cir.· 1971-06-01 ·cited 22×
  The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for transporting falsely made and forged securities in interstate commerce.
• United States v. Covington
  411 F.2d 1087· 4th Cir.· 1969-06-12 ·cited 22×
  The court holds that a substantial variance between the indictment and proof, while concerning, is permissible under existing authorities.
• United States v. Roviaro
  379 F.2d 911· 7th Cir.· 1967-06-28 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient, the evidence supported the conviction, and various evidentiary and procedural issues did not warrant reversal.
• Lumetta v. United States
  362 F.2d 644· 8th Cir.· 1966-06-23 ·cited 22×
  The court held that evidence of corporate income was admissible to show willfulness, and that the defendant was the responsible person for filing corporate tax returns, even if the corporate charter had been forfeited.
• United States v. Shirley
  435 F.2d 1076· 7th Cir.· 1970-12-23 ·cited 21×
  The court held that the trial judge did not commit prejudicial error by giving a supplemental jury instruction clarifying the charges, nor by admitting a Miranda waiver form, nor by allowing certain prosecutorial remarks.
• United States v. Anderson
  1 F.4th 1244· 11th Cir.· 2021-06-15 ·cited 20×
  Michael Brian Anderson, owner of a shrimping business, was convicted of mail fraud, false statements, and money laundering for submitting fraudulent claims under a federal subsidy program, falsely claiming over $24 million in business expenses when his tax returns showed minimal
• United States v. Civelli
  883 F.2d 191· 2d Cir.· 1989-08-15 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the district court did not commit plain error by giving a supplemental jury instruction on conscious avoidance of knowledge, even after closing arguments, as the evidence supported the charge and the jury's inquiry necessitated it.
• United States v. Agnes
  753 F.2d 293· 3d Cir.· 1985-01-24 ·cited 20×
  The court held that a claim-of-right defense is not applicable to Hobbs Act extortion charges, and that the district court did not err in excluding evidence or instructing the jury on this matter.
• United States v. Barker
  735 F.2d 1280· 11th Cir.· 1984-07-05 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the circumstantial evidence was sufficient for conviction, the jury instructions were proper, the substitution of an alternate juror was not an abuse of discretion, and lay witness testimony on handwriting was admissible.
• United States v. Bennett
  563 F.2d 879· 8th Cir.· 1977-08-17 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the jury instructions regarding the five-person requirement for an illegal gambling business were not erroneous, and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
• Willis v. United States
  530 F.2d 308· 8th Cir.· 1976-02-27 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the defendant's entrapment defense was properly rejected, as the evidence did not establish entrapment as a matter of law and the jury instructions were adequate.
• United States v. Williams
  481 F.2d 735· 8th Cir.· 1973-07-11 ·cited 20×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that the trial court did not err in its rulings regarding the informant's testimony or jury instructions.
• United States v. Clarke
  468 F.2d 890· 5th Cir.· 1972-10-26 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the trial judge did not err in his voir dire, in response to prosecutor remarks, or in his jury instructions, and affirmed the conviction.
• The United States v. Dawson
  467 F.2d 668· 8th Cir.· 1972-10-05 ·cited 20×
  The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 842(h) is a constitutional exercise of Congress's Commerce Clause power and that the conviction was not tainted by procedural errors.
• Archer v. United States
  393 F.2d 124· 5th Cir.· 1968-04-11 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the defendant's statement to the FBI was admissible because it was not made during a custodial interrogation, and the defendant waived her right to an attorney. The court also held that the defendant waived any claim regarding the lack of an accomplice instruc
• Hall v. United States
  378 F.2d 349· 10th Cir.· 1967-05-24 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the trial court erred by refusing to allow defense counsel to make objections to jury instructions out of the presence of the jury, as required by Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
• Knapp v. United States
  311 F.2d 71· 5th Cir.· 1962-12-11 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt for narcotics offenses, and the defendant's procedural failures precluded review of most alleged errors.
• Ryan v. United States
  278 F.2d 836· 9th Cir.· 1960-05-13 ·cited 20×
  A bank officer can be convicted under 18 U.S.C.A. § 220 for receiving a fee for procuring a loan even if the fee is received after the loan is made, and an erroneous jury instruction that does not affect substantial rights is not grounds for reversal.
• Hill v. United States
  261 F.2d 483· 9th Cir.· 1958-11-03 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction on count two, and that the mandatory sentencing provisions did not violate due process.
• Marbs v. United States
  250 F.2d 514· 8th Cir.· 1957-12-27 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the jury instructions on entrapment were adequate and that sufficient evidence supported the conspiracy conviction, affirming the judgments.
• United States v. Shafer
  445 F.2d 579· 7th Cir.· 1971-07-12 ·cited 19×
  The court held that the destruction of evidence by the government was not reversible error, and that disassembled grenades constitute 'firearms' under the Gun Control Act. The court also found that the inadvertent submission of evidence to the jury was harmless error.
• United States v. Klein
  187 F.2d 873· 7th Cir.· 1951-03-06 ·cited 19×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings, prosecutorial arguments, or jury instructions, and that sufficient evidence supported the convictions.
• United States v. Pearce
  912 F.2d 159· 6th Cir.· 1990-08-31 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support conspiracy convictions, as mere presence and association do not establish an agreement to commit a crime. However, convictions for possession and carrying a firearm were affirmed.
• United States v. Thomas
  895 F.2d 51· 1st Cir.· 1990-02-06 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the trial judge did not err in refusing to give a multiple conspiracy instruction, and the sentence imposed was within the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range.
• Brennan v. United States
  867 F.2d 111· 2d Cir.· 1989-01-20 ·cited 18×
  The court held that Brennan's RICO convictions were valid because they were supported by legally sufficient predicate acts (Travel Act convictions) even after the wire fraud convictions were vacated, and his statute of limitations and enterprise arguments were procedurally barred
• United States v. Marlin Walter Larson, D.O.
  722 F.2d 139· 5th Cir.· 1983-12-23 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on entrapment and in allowing the jury to use transcripts of taped conversations, as these rulings did not constitute plain error.
• United States v. Wade
  467 F.2d 1226· 8th Cir.· 1972-10-16 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in extending the time for filing a notice of appeal and did not abuse its discretion in denying a mistrial motion based on a juror's prejudicial remark.
• United States v. Todaro
  448 F.2d 64· 3d Cir.· 1971-09-03 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the admission of testimony regarding prior and subsequent acts was proper to show intent, design, and modus operandi, and that other objections not raised below did not constitute plain error.
• Ayala v. United States
  371 F.2d 515· 9th Cir.· 1967-01-25 ·cited 18×
  The court held that while the trial court should have instructed the jury on entrapment, the conviction on a separate count with a concurrent sentence renders the error harmless.
• United States v. Kaye
  251 F.2d 87· 2d Cir.· 1958-01-17 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for uttering and conspiring to utter counterfeit bonds, and that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings or jury instructions.
• United States v. Buckner
  610 F.2d 570· 9th Cir.· 1979-10-03 ·cited 17×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient, co-defendant statements were admissible, and the evidence supported the jury's verdict on the substantive counts and conspiracy.
• Monroe B. Harris v. United States
  261 F.2d 897· 9th Cir.· 1958-12-01 ·cited 17×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court did not err in admitting testimony or in its jury instructions.
• United States v. E.W. Freeman
  813 F.2d 303· 10th Cir.· 1987-03-05 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the defendant's motion for arrest of judgment was untimely and that the indictment and jury instructions were not fatally defective or unconstitutionally vague.
• United States v. London
  753 F.2d 202· 2d Cir.· 1985-01-09 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the jury charge was adequate because the indictment and evidence of misrepresentations directed to the nature of the bargain sufficiently established the contemplation of harm required for mail and wire fraud convictions.
• Quinn v. United States
  499 F.2d 794· 8th Cir.· 1974-07-09 ·cited 16×
  The court held that a defendant's failure to request a lesser included offense instruction, when the lesser offense was enumerated in the Major Crimes Act, constitutes a trial error not subject to collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
• United States v. Alvarez
  469 F.2d 1065· 9th Cir.· 1972-11-29 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in withholding the informant's identity and that the jury instructions were not a basis for reversal.
• Tallman v. United States
  465 F.2d 282· 7th Cir.· 1972-07-06 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the statute prohibiting obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio communication is constitutional, and the indictment was sufficient.
• United States v. Ledbetter
  432 F.2d 1223· 10th Cir.· 1970-11-09 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the shotgun was lawfully seized under the plain view doctrine and that the defendant received adequate representation and competent counsel.
• United States v. Krosky
  418 F.2d 65· 6th Cir.· 1969-11-13 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the failure to adequately explain the meaning of 'willfulness' to the jury constituted plain error, requiring reversal.
• Hart v. United States
  396 F.2d 243· 8th Cir.· 1968-06-20 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's finding of intent to pass counterfeit obligations as genuine, and that the defendant waived any objection to the jury instructions on entrapment by failing to raise it at trial.
• Cohen v. United States
  366 F.2d 363· 9th Cir.· 1966-09-08 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the denial of the motion to dismiss the second indictment was not clearly erroneous, and the conviction on eleven counts was affirmed.
• Jones v. United States
  307 F.2d 190· D.C. Cir.· 1962-07-12 ·cited 16×
  The dissenting judge believes the appellant should have a new trial due to errors in the jury charge.
• United States v. Ramsey
  291 F.2d 737· 6th Cir.· 1961-06-30 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the evidence, including fingerprint analysis and circumstantial evidence of collaboration, was sufficient for conviction, and the jury instructions were not fundamentally erroneous.
• Jones v. United States
  282 F.2d 745· 4th Cir.· 1960-10-10 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the defendant's conviction for tax evasion was valid, as the trial court did not err in admitting evidence or in its jury instructions, and the defendant's arguments on appeal lacked merit.
• Bieber v. United States
  276 F.2d 709· 9th Cir.· 1960-03-03 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecution to examine a witness as to prior contradictory statements without a preliminary hearing, nor in its jury instructions, as objections were not properly preserved.