Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(6)

207 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Franks
  939 F.2d 600· 8th Cir.· 1991-07-24
  The court held that Federal Express records, microfilmed and maintained by the company, were properly admitted under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, even though the custodian lacked personal knowledge of their creation, and their admission did not violate conf
• United States v. Simmons
  773 F.2d 1455· 4th Cir.· 1985-09-30
  The admission of ATF forms and Agent Parker's testimony as hearsay under Fed.R.Evid. 803(24) was improper because trustworthiness and the unavailability of more probative evidence were not established.
• Clayton Ctr. Assocs. v. Schindler Haughton Elevator Corp.
  770 F.2d 749· 8th Cir.· 1985-08-27
  The court held that the district court did not err in admitting deposition testimony regarding damages and a logbook, nor in submitting a jury instruction, and that the evidence sufficiently supported the jury's damage award.
• United States v. Moore
  748 F.2d 246· 5th Cir.· 1984-11-19
  The court held that the letter was not inadmissible hearsay because it was offered to prove the falsity of its contents, not the truth of the matter asserted.
• Am. Int'l Pictures, Inc. v. Price Enters., Inc.
  636 F.2d 933· 4th Cir.· 1980-12-22
  The court held that the admission of evidence from 'open' and 'blind' checks and expert testimony on damages was proper, and the damages award was not based on an improper 'fluid recovery' theory.