Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(24) (Residual Hearsay Exception)

11 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. White
  611 F.2d 531· 5th Cir.· 1980-02-06 ·cited 89×
  The court held that sufficient evidence existed to establish territorial jurisdiction and venue, the admission of a Treasury claim form was proper under the residual hearsay exception, and the evidence was sufficient to prove intent to defraud.
• United States v. Helmel
  769 F.2d 1306· 8th Cir.· 1985-08-08 ·cited 77×
  The court held that the admission of the ledger was proper for Stowe, Helmel, and Glick under the coconspirator rule, but reversed Paulsen's conviction due to insufficient independent evidence to support the admission of the ledger against him. The court also found that Stowe and
• United States v. Renville
  779 F.2d 430· 8th Cir.· 1985-12-11 ·cited 53×
  The court held that statements of identity made by a child abuse victim to a physician are admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) when the abuser is a family member, and that statements made to a deputy sheriff identifying the abuser are admissible under the residual he
• United States v. Ferlin K. Dorian
  803 F.2d 1439· 8th Cir.· 1986-10-27 ·cited 40×
  The court held that the testimony of Roxanne's foster mother, Monica Whiting, regarding statements made by Roxanne, lacked sufficient indicia of reliability and thus violated the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause.
• United States v. Scrima
  819 F.2d 996· 11th Cir.· 1987-06-19 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the district court did not err in excluding hearsay testimony regarding the defendant's alleged cash hoard and in limiting the scope of the expert witness's testimony.
• United States v. DeNOYER
  811 F.2d 436· 8th Cir.· 1987-02-09 ·cited 21×
  The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the child victim's out-of-court statements and the defendant's statements to police, nor in excluding defense expert testimony or refusing lesser included offense instruction
• Ricciardi v. The Child's. Hosp. Med. Ctr.
  811 F.2d 18· 1st Cir.· 1987-02-06 ·cited 16×
  The court held that a medical chart note, lacking personal knowledge from the entrant and with an unknown source, was inadmissible hearsay and could not be the basis for an expert witness's opinion.
• United States v. George
  960 F.2d 97· 9th Cir.· 1992-03-24 ·cited 15×
  The admission of hearsay statements made by a child victim to her examining physician and a tribal investigator did not violate the Confrontation Clause, and the denial of a new trial based on the victim's recantation was not an abuse of discretion.
• Willco Kuwait (Trading) S.A.K. v. Peter J. deSAVARY
  843 F.2d 618· 1st Cir.· 1988-04-07 ·cited 11×
  The court held that the district court did not err in denying Willco's motion for a new trial on its fraud claim, nor in its evidentiary rulings, but remanded for a reduction in damages awarded on the breach of contract counterclaim.
• United States v. Pelullo
  964 F.2d 193· 3d Cir.· 1992-05-12 ·cited 9×
  The court held that the admission of bank documents and summaries as evidence was improper hearsay, as no valid exception applied, and this error was not harmless for most counts.
• United States v. Blackburn
  992 F.2d 666· 7th Cir.· 1993-04-22
  The court held that the district court did not err in refusing to define reasonable doubt or in admitting certain testimony and exhibits, but erred in admitting a specific lab report under the business records exception.