Federal Rule Of Evidence 404(B)

1,318 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 7 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Dell L. Pooler
  961 F.2d 1354· 8th Cir.· 1992-04-15
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for making a false bank entry and that the admission of prior bad acts evidence and the sentencing calculations were not erroneous.
• United States v. Ervin Jahue Blevins
  960 F.2d 1252· 4th Cir.· 1992-03-31
  The introduction of testimony that six non-testifying co-defendants pleaded guilty constituted error, but this error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
• United States v. Gomez-Osorio
  957 F.2d 636· 9th Cir.· 1992-02-18
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's convictions for failing to report currency transportation and structuring monetary transactions, and that the district court did not err in admitting expert testimony, refusing a jury instruction, denying
• Turley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
  944 F.2d 669· 10th Cir.· 1991-09-04
  The court held that the district court erred in excluding evidence of prior insurance fraud, which was relevant to intent and collusion, and that a new trial is required.
• United States v. Jeffrey Irwin Bakke (90-1978)
  942 F.2d 977· 6th Cir.· 1991-08-23
  The court held that the admission of evidence concerning a defendant's subsequent arrest and drug-related activities was prejudicial error under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) because it was not relevant to the charged conspiracy. However, the court affirmed the convictions of o
• United States v. Cohen
  946 F.2d 430· 6th Cir.· 1991-08-06
  The court held that sufficient evidence supported the conviction, the consent judgment was admissible, and the sentence enhancements and valuation were not clearly erroneous.
• United States v. Vielka Dudley
  941 F.2d 260· 4th Cir.· 1991-07-25
  The court held that evidence of a prior conviction was admissible for context, a summary report of destroyed records was admissible as best evidence, prosecutorial remarks were not misconduct, and a sentence enhancement for substantial interference with justice was proper. The co
• Berkovich v. Winslow Hicks
  922 F.2d 1018· 2d Cir.· 1991-01-04
• United States v. Nicely
  922 F.2d 850· D.C. Cir.· 1991-01-04
  The court held that the two conspiracies charged in the indictment were misjoined, causing prejudice to the defendants, and therefore reversed the convictions.
• United States v. Trice
  864 F.2d 1421· 8th Cir.· 1988-12-29
  The court held that defendants are not entitled to a new trial based on the magistrate's presiding over jury selection because they failed to object and received a fundamentally fair trial.
• United States v. Yarns
  811 F.2d 454· 8th Cir.· 1987-02-10
  The court held that the district court did not err in excluding cross-examination about a witness's past illegal activities and in admitting the defendant's statements about his ability to lie.
• Lewis v. United States
  771 F.2d 454· 10th Cir.· 1985-08-27
  The court held that the government provided adequate notice of its rebuttal witness and properly admitted evidence of a prior burglary, and that newly discovered evidence did not warrant a new trial.
• United States v. Elbert Ronald Boone and Pecolia Anne Boone
  759 F.2d 345· 4th Cir.· 1985-04-09
  The court held that the district court did not err in excluding defendants from an in-chambers conference regarding juror substitution, nor in admitting evidence of other crimes, giving an Allen charge, or restricting cross-examination.
• United States v. Killingsworth
  719 F.2d 1130· 11th Cir.· 1983-11-17
  The court held that the government presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and properly admitted extrinsic act evidence.
• United States v. Saldivar
  710 F.2d 699· 11th Cir.· 1983-07-25
  The court held that the joinder of father and son for trial was proper, evidence previously used for a conspiracy count was admissible, character evidence restrictions were harmless, cross-examination and closing arguments were permissible, sufficiency of evidence supported convi
• United States v. Cardillo
  708 F.2d 29· 1st Cir.· 1983-06-03
  The court held that the defendant's conviction was valid as he lacked standing to challenge the search, the evidence admitted was relevant and properly considered, and his other claims were without merit.
• United States v. Ernie Lewis
  700 F.2d 1328· 10th Cir.· 1983-02-15
  The court held that evidence of prior drug smuggling activities was admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) to refute the defendant's claims of lack of knowledge and mistake.
• United States v. Cauley
  697 F.2d 486· 2d Cir.· 1983-01-05
  The court held that the trial judge did not commit reversible error in admitting evidence of the defendant's prior fights during cross-examination, nor in jury instructions or denial of self-representation.
• Driscoll v. Parnell Schmitt
  649 F.2d 631· 8th Cir.· 1981-06-02
  The court held that the admission of certain hospital statements and the exclusion of other testimony did not constitute reversible error, as the evidence was either cumulative, admissible for impeachment, or not unduly prejudicial.