Federal Rule Of Criminal Procedure 8(B) Joinder

19 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Marszalkowski
  669 F.2d 655· 11th Cir.· 1982-03-01 ·cited 79×
  The court held that the trial judge erred in suppressing evidence obtained during the initial search, finding the warrantless entry constitutional under existing law. It also affirmed the convictions of Bennett and Marszalkowski.
• United States v. Morales
  868 F.2d 1562· 11th Cir.· 1989-04-06 ·cited 70×
  The court held that the initial joinder of defendants in the indictment was proper under Rule 8(b) and that the denial of severance motions under Rule 14 was not an abuse of discretion, as no compelling prejudice was demonstrated.
• United States v. Hattaway
  740 F.2d 1419· 7th Cir.· 1984-07-31 ·cited 68×
  The court held that the joinder of defendants, admission of evidence regarding the victim's death and the defendants' lifestyle, and the prosecutor's rebuttal arguments were not grounds for reversal. The court also affirmed the sufficiency of evidence for conspiracy convictions.
• United States v. Burreson
  643 F.2d 1344· 9th Cir.· 1981-02-09 ·cited 68×
  The court held that joinder of defendants and charges was proper, severance was not required, and the evidence supported a single conspiracy conviction. The court affirmed convictions but remanded for correction of Laraneta's sentences on specific counts.
• United States v. Rogers
  921 F.2d 975· 10th Cir.· 1990-03-26 ·cited 63×
  The court held that Miranda warnings are not required for routine post-conviction presentence interviews, and that delays caused by speedy trial motions are excludable under the Speedy Trial Act.
• United States v. Hartley E. Greenleaf, Jr.
  692 F.2d 182· 1st Cir.· 1982-11-02 ·cited 60×
  The court held that the defendants' convictions for mail fraud and RICO were not clearly and grossly unjust, and that the trial court did not err in denying severance or in its jury instructions. Consecutive sentences for RICO and mail fraud were permissible.
• United States v. Russo
  796 F.2d 1443· 11th Cir.· 1986-08-19 ·cited 58×
  The court affirmed the convictions, finding no merit in the appellants' challenges regarding misjoinder, severance, speedy trial rights, evidentiary rulings, or sufficiency of the evidence.
• United States v. Gentile
  495 F.2d 626· 5th Cir.· 1974-06-07 ·cited 58×
  The court held that the unrelated offense in Count 3 was improperly joined with Counts 1 and 2 for Gentile, requiring reversal of his conviction. The court affirmed Marquart's conviction, finding no merit to his claims of suppressed evidence or newly discovered evidence.
• United States v. Branker
  395 F.2d 881· 2d Cir.· 1968-05-13 ·cited 49×
  The court held that the convictions of Branker, Lopez, Moore, and Ross should be affirmed, as no prejudice resulted from the joint trial.
• United States v. Tashjian
  660 F.2d 829· 1st Cir.· 1981-09-30 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the joinder of counts was permissible under Rule 8(b) following the Supreme Court's clarification of RICO's scope, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying severance motions or in refusing to grant a new trial based on alleged prosecuto
• United States v. Rogers
  722 F.2d 557· 9th Cir.· 1983-12-28 ·cited 35×
  The court held that the appellants' convictions for bankruptcy fraud and conspiracy were supported by sufficient evidence and that their procedural challenges, including claims of tainted testimony, improper joinder, and pre-indictment delay, were without merit.
• United States v. Inez Eaton Guerrero
  756 F.2d 1342· 9th Cir.· 1984-06-07 ·cited 34×
  The court affirmed convictions, holding that joinder of defendants and offenses was proper, severance was not required, venue changes were unwarranted, evidence was properly admitted, and speedy trial rights were not violated.
• United States v. Brugman
  655 F.2d 540· 4th Cir.· 1981-05-15 ·cited 23×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying severance motions, admitting evidence of similar acts with limiting instructions, or in allowing a co-defendant who pleaded guilty to testify, as no Sixth Amendment violation occurred.
• United States v. Haney
  914 F.2d 602· 4th Cir.· 1990-10-25 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the joinder of indictments and the admission of evidence of a prior Georgia robbery were proper.
• United States v. Avery
  760 F.2d 1219· 11th Cir.· 1985-05-21 ·cited 8×
  The court held that Arthur Avery's perjury count was properly joined and severance was not warranted, but Alisa Avery's conviction must be reversed due to a Bruton violation from her father's grand jury testimony.
• United States v. Wooldridge
  572 F.2d 1027· 5th Cir.· 1978-05-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the joinder of defendants and charges was proper, and the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings or jury instructions.
• United States v. Davidson
  936 F.2d 856· 6th Cir.· 1991-06-18 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in refusing to sever tax charges pertaining only to an absent co-defendant.
• United States v. Yaroslaw Kopelciw
  815 F.2d 1235· 8th Cir.· 1987-04-10 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court did not err in denying motions for severance and continuance, nor was the sentencing of Bittner excessive.
• United States v. Nicely
  922 F.2d 850· D.C. Cir.· 1991-01-04
  The court held that the two conspiracies charged in the indictment were misjoined, causing prejudice to the defendants, and therefore reversed the convictions.