Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 8(A)(2) Notice Pleading

10 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Colonial Penn Ins. v. Value Rent-A-Car Inc.
  814 F. Supp. 1084· S.D. Fla.· 1992-12-08 ·cited 17×
  The court denied in part and granted in part motions to dismiss the second amended complaint, finding federal and Florida RICO claims, breach of contract, and civil theft claims sufficiently pleaded, but granted dismissal for certain fraud claims and conspiracy allegations.
• Wade v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
  693 F.2d 19· 2d Cir.· 1982-11-15 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the appellants' complaint sufficiently alleged the employer's 'specific intent' to injure, thus falling outside the exclusive remedy provision of the Vermont Workmen's Compensation Act and surviving a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Physicians Guardian Unit Inv. Tr. Ex Rel. Physicians Guardian, Inc.
  72 F. Supp. 2d 1342· M.D. Fla.· 1999-10-29 ·cited 4×
  The court denied the motion to dismiss, finding that the complaint sufficiently alleged fraud with particularity under Rule 9(b) and satisfied the notice pleading requirements of Rule 8.
• RSN Assocs. LLC v. Ajjarapu
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-16
  The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint failed to meet the heightened pleading requirements for fraud claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA).
• Tobin v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-11-05
  The court held that the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint should be dismissed for failing to state a claim, violating pleading rules, and failing to follow court orders.
• Khan v. Palomera
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-18
  The court held that the plaintiff's federal securities law claims and state law claims for civil theft, conversion, and breach of contract were dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to meet heightened pleading standards.
• Epson Am., Inc. v. Safe Space Scan Tech. LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to meet the heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) for its Lanham Act and FDUTPA claims.
• Greenfeld v. Squidvision Corp.
  S.D. Fla.· 2023-03-31
  The court granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding federal securities claims based on unregistered offerings exempt but allowing state securities fraud and Rule 10b-5 claims to proceed.
• Skypoint Advisors, LLC. v. 3 Amigos Prods. LLC.
  M.D. Fla.· 2019-09-23
  The court denied the defendants' motion for reconsideration, finding they failed to demonstrate clear error or manifest injustice in the prior order denying their motion to dismiss.
• Raber v. Osprey Alaska, Inc.
  965 F. Supp. 2d 353· M.D. Fla.· 1999-06-17
  The court held that the plaintiffs' amended complaint sufficiently pleaded claims for breach of contract and fraud to survive a motion to dismiss, as the allegations met the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 9(b).