Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 7.1

15 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Danube Logistics USA, Inc. v. Lynnhurst Logistics, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-21 ·cited 22×
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes, requiring further disclosure.
• Asuzene Grady v. Bj's Wholesale Club, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-07
  The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to adequately allege diversity jurisdiction due to insufficient pleading of party citizenship and amount in controversy.
• Hammond v. W. Express Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-07-25
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately establish diversity jurisdiction due to insufficient allegations of citizenship and amount in controversy.
• Jaghab v. Progressive Select Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-07-11
  The court held that the plaintiff's pleadings failed to adequately allege the citizenship of the parties, thus failing to establish diversity jurisdiction.
• David v. Wawa, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-30
  The court found the plaintiff's complaint lacked sufficient allegations to establish diversity jurisdiction and ordered the plaintiff to file a Rule 7.1 disclosure statement. The court also ordered the defendant to file a properly redacted exhibit due to a violation of Rule 5.2.
• Repecka v. Walmart Stores E., L.P.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-23
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes.
• Herring v. Yelm
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-06
  The court held that the defendants failed to establish federal diversity jurisdiction because their notice of removal lacked sufficient allegations regarding the parties' citizenship and the amount in controversy.
• Ferguson Enters. Inc. v. Barfield
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-03-03
  The court held that the defendant failed to adequately demonstrate subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity, and the plaintiffs failed to comply with disclosure requirements.
• Redondo Martinez v. Flynt
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-09
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes.
• Next Ins. US Co. v. Apogee Integrations, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-10-07
  This is a procedural order addressing deficiencies in disclosure statements filed by defendants in a diversity jurisdiction case. The court struck one defendant's disclosure statement for failing to properly identify himself as a legal representative and provide the decedent's ci
• Short v. Oros
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-21
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes.
• Young v. Figueroa
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-02-06
  The court held that the parties' pleadings failed to adequately allege citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes, requiring them to file specific disclosure statements.
• Adams v. Fam. Dollar Stores of Fla. LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-02-05
  The court held that the parties must file Rule 7.1 disclosure statements to clarify citizenship for diversity jurisdiction.
• Saunders v. Breit MF Preserve at Lakeland, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-02-28
  The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction due to a lack of complete diversity of citizenship between the parties and dismissed the case without prejudice.
• Saunders v. Breit MF Preserve at Lakeland, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-01-12
  The court held that the defendants' disclosure statements were incomplete and ordered them to file amended statements identifying the citizenship of all members of their constituent entities.