Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 62(B)

10 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Yates v. Pinellas Hematology & Oncology, P.A.
  2017 WL 11461033· M.D. Fla.· 2020-02-11 ·cited 6×
  The court granted the motion to stay enforcement of the amended final judgment, conditioned on the posting of an adequate bond.
• United States v. Homestake Mining Co.
  595 F.2d 421· 8th Cir.· 1979-03-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that Section 309(a)(5)(B) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 does not apply to water quality-based effluent limitations, and that the district court erred by determining Homestake's eligibility for an extension without remanding to the EPA.
• In re Zapata Gulf Marine Corp.
  941 F.2d 293· 5th Cir.· 1991-08-23 ·cited 2×
  The court held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) does not authorize a district court to stay execution of an underlying judgment pending appeal of an order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.
• Synchrony Bank v. Cabinets To Go, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-08-21
  The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendations, approving the defendant's supersedeas bond and granting the plaintiff's motion for bill of costs in part.
• Mont Claire at Pelican Marsh Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-03-08
  The court held that a supersedeas bond must adequately secure the prevailing party against all potential outcomes of an appeal, not just affirmation of the judgment, and must not contain reservation of rights language that clouds the surety's obligation.
• Hartman v. Does
  S.D. Fla.· 2023-11-27
  A party may register a judgment in another district court upon a showing of good cause, which is established by demonstrating insufficient assets in the rendering jurisdiction and substantial assets elsewhere.
• Zonja v. Blake
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-04-28
  The court held that while the bill of costs would be stayed pending appeal, the plaintiff's request to waive the supersedeas bond requirement was denied due to insufficient demonstration of financial solvency.
• PB Legacy, Inc. v. Am. Mariculture, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2023-02-15
  A party's appeal does not automatically stay enforcement of a judgment, and the acceptance of benefits doctrine does not apply when the appealing party seeks to enforce a judgment while also appealing issues on which they did not prevail.
• Marjam Supply Co. of Fla., LLC v. Pliteq, Inc.
  S.D. Fla.· 2021-05-03
  The court recommended granting Marjam's motion to approve its supersedeas bond and stay execution of the final judgment pending appeal.
• Ladies Mem'l Ass'n Inc v. City of Pensacola Fla.
  N.D. Fla.· 2020-10-26
  The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for an injunction pending appeal, finding they were unlikely to succeed on the merits and would not suffer irreparable harm.