-
2017 WL 6387780·
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-16
·cited 1×
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
-
231 F. Supp. 284·
N.D. Fla.·
2010-08-19
·cited 1×
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, but conditioned it upon the plaintiff reimbursing the defendants for their reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred in both the original and current Florida cases.
-
951 F.2d 155·
7th Cir.·
1991-12-27
·cited 1×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the plaintiff's case with prejudice due to his lack of diligence, failure to comply with discovery, and inability to produce evidence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-12
The court held that the plaintiff's repeated failures to comply with court orders, including failing to appear for trial, warranted dismissal with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-08
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice because it was motivated by a desire to avoid an expected adverse ruling on the defendant's summary judgment motion.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-11-17
The Eleventh Circuit held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) with conditions, nor in its evidentiary rulings, affirming the trial court's judgments.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-18
The court held that dismissing an insurer's counterclaim without prejudice does not legally prejudice the insured and allows for final judgment, preserving the insured's right to appeal the prior summary judgment order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice, finding that the defendant would not suffer clear legal prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-18
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion to disburse net sale proceeds, finding it retained jurisdiction to adjudicate the distribution of funds as agreed upon in the settlement and dismissal orders.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-08
The court recommended denying the defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and expenses without prejudice because the defendant failed to comply with local rules regarding the submission of billing records and task descriptions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-02
The court recommended granting the motion for default judgment, finding the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify the insured due to policy exclusions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-30
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss with prejudice, declining to condition the dismissal on the defendant's award of attorney's fees and costs.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-05
The court granted the parties' joint motion to dismiss the action with prejudice, retaining jurisdiction solely to determine attorney's fees.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-22
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to dismiss claims against two defendants with prejudice, finding that the remaining defendant would not suffer legal prejudice and that dismissal was appropriate under Rule 41(a)(2).
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-05-20
The District Court should dismiss the action because the plaintiff failed to comply with court orders and failed to prosecute the case.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-06
A plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) should generally be granted unless the defendant will suffer clear legal prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-25
The court granted plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, finding no clear legal prejudice to the defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court held that a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires all appearing parties to sign, and if not, it may be construed as a motion to dismiss under Rule 41(a)(2).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-07
A stipulation of dismissal requires all appearing parties to sign, and if not, it may be construed as a motion to dismiss under Rule 41(a)(2).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-28
The court denied the parties' motion for a stipulated permanent injunction because the proposed terms were too vague and lacked a sufficient factual predicate to establish standing and the necessity for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-07
The court recommends granting the plaintiff's motion for dismissal without prejudice, subject to a condition regarding future litigation costs.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-13
The court denied the parties' joint motion for a stipulated injunction and dismissal because the proposed injunction lacked a factual predicate for standing and its terms were too vague to be enforced by coercive contempt.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-23
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to dismiss without prejudice but retained jurisdiction to consider defendants' request for attorney fees and costs.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-15
Local Access, LLC and Peerless Network, Inc. jointly moved to dismiss their action with prejudice. The district court granted the dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), finding that while a stipulated dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) might have been problem
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-09-25
The court held that it erred in granting dismissal before the plaintiff's response deadline, but the dismissal of counterclaims is granted with a condition that costs may be assessed if refiled.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-08-12
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss claims against a specific defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-05
A plaintiff cannot voluntarily dismiss fewer than all counts of a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) or 41(a)(2).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-26
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal with prejudice and denied the defendant's motion for sanctions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-19
The Court construes an ineffective stipulation of dismissal as a Rule 41(a)(2) motion and allows parties to object or amend.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-08
This is a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case in which plaintiffs Qamar Lewis and Reginald Marshall-Howard sued defendants OPG Security LLC and Duane S Broom II. The court approved a settlement agreement and dismissed Lewis's FLSA claims with prejudice after the parties submitte
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-10-25
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss all claims against the TTT Defendants without prejudice, finding no clear legal prejudice to the defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-10-20
The court held that it would permit the plaintiff to dismiss his case without prejudice, conditioned upon the plaintiff paying all attorney's fees and costs incurred by the defendants if the plaintiff re-files the action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-21
The court held that Plaintiff's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is overruled, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-18
A motion to voluntarily dismiss specific counterclaims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) must be denied because the rule only permits dismissal of an entire action, not individual claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-20
The court granted plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice and granted defendants' motion for sanctions against plaintiff's counsel.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-08
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice because the defendant would suffer clear legal prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-24
The court held that a plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice should be denied when the defendant has a substantial right to removal under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) that would be lost by the dismissal.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-31
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-02
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, finding that the defendant had not demonstrated clear legal prejudice and that the case had achieved its intended purpose of bringing the defendant into ADA compliance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-03
The court denied Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment and default judgment, requiring a renewed motion for default judgment that properly connects the complaint to the relevant legal standards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-13
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to dismiss claims against Kim Cherry without prejudice, but denied the request for each party to bear their own costs and fees, allowing Kim Cherry to file a separate motion for attorney's fees if she has a good faith basis.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-10
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the action with prejudice, awarding the defendant its litigation costs.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-20
The court held that it may decline supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims when all federal claims are dismissed, and in this case, it was appropriate to do so.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-11-02
The court awarded partial attorneys' fees and costs to the defendant, finding that much of the work performed in the prior litigation was not reusable in the current action due to differing relief sought.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-12
The court granted the joint motion to dismiss the Tillman Defendants with prejudice, finding no clear legal prejudice to the remaining defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-02
The court granted the parties' joint motion to dismiss the limitation of liability proceeding with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-06-02
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice and awarded defendant its attorney's fees and costs incurred in the federal litigation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-05-18
The court held that it may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims when all claims over which it had original jurisdiction have been dismissed, especially at an early stage of litigation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-17
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss her claim without prejudice because the defendant would not suffer legal prejudice and the motion was unopposed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-11
The court held that the defendant is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and taxable costs incurred in the previously dismissed action, but the amount must be substantiated and limited to expenses not useful in the current litigation.