Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 24(A)(2) Intervention

11 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Bethune Plaza, Inc. v. Lumpkin
  863 F.2d 525· 7th Cir.· 1988-11-23 ·cited 35×
  The court held that a trade association's mere concern with the stare decisis effect of a district court opinion is insufficient to justify intervention as of right under Rule 24(a)(2).
• Brennan v. Silvergate Dist. Lodge NO. 50, Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO
  503 F.2d 800· 9th Cir.· 1974-09-13 ·cited 32×
  The court held that an incumbent union officer cannot intervene as a party defendant in a suit brought by the Secretary of Labor to set aside a union election, as this would frustrate the statutory scheme and the Secretary's screening function.
• F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Miscellaneous Warehousemen's Union
  629 F.2d 1204· 7th Cir.· 1980-08-07 ·cited 30×
  Individual employees have standing to intervene and appeal an order vacating an arbitration award in their favor when their union declines to appeal and does not object to the intervention.
• Beryl N. Jones v. Caddo Parish Sch. Bd.
  735 F.2d 923· 5th Cir.· 1984-07-09 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ms. Phillips' motion to intervene as untimely, given the long history of the litigation and her awareness of her interests.
• Cities Serv. Co. v. Dep't OF Energy
  715 F.2d 572· Temp. Emer. Ct. App.· 1983-07-14 ·cited 20×
  The court held that Cities Service lacked a sufficient interest to intervene in the DOE's enforcement action against Pennzoil, and therefore could not appeal the settlement.
• Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Kelley
  747 F.2d 777· D.C. Cir.· 1984-11-06 ·cited 15×
  The court held that Senator Helms lacked a legally protectable interest sufficient to confer standing for intervention, affirming the denial of his motion.
• Farmland Dairies & Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc. v. Comm'r OF the NEW York State Dep't OF Agric. & Mkts.
  847 F.2d 1038· 2d Cir.· 1988-05-26 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the proposed intervenors' motion to intervene as untimely, and therefore affirmed that order and dismissed the appeals from other district court orders.
• Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. Environs Dev. Corp.
  601 F.2d 851· 5th Cir.· 1979-08-30 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment against Pringle and should have permitted O'Neal to intervene, reversing the decision.
• Lake Invs. Dev. Grp., Inc. v. Egidi Dev. Grp.
  715 F.2d 1256· 7th Cir.· 1983-09-01 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the petitioner met the requirements for intervention as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) because he demonstrated a direct and substantial interest in the subject matter, potential impairment of that interest, and inadequate repr
• Montgomery v. Seminole Hard Rock Digit., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-02-10
  The Seminole Tribe of Florida's motion to intervene as of right is granted because the defendant does not adequately represent the Tribe's unique interests in defending its sovereign immunity and gaming rights.
• Rain Forest Adventures (Holdings) Ltd. v. AIG Ins. Hong Kong Ltd.
  S.D. Fla.· 2020-03-18
  The court held that the insurance policy's Disputes Clause clearly delegates threshold arbitrability issues to the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), and therefore, the insurer's motion to compel arbitration is granted.