-
994 F.2d 236·
5th Cir.·
1993-06-22
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring most of his claims, but remanded for further findings on his capacity to sue on behalf of a trust.
-
713 F. Supp. 1420·
M.D. Fla.·
1989-05-19
The court held that while ARAMCO is not the proper party to bring the statutory claims, it will be given 30 days to seek ratification or joinder of the real party in interest, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
-
855 F.2d 222·
5th Cir.·
1988-09-20
The court held that it had jurisdiction, the evidence supported the jury's findings, and the district court properly ruled on the claims, affirming the judgment.
-
829 F.2d 463-473·
3d Cir.·
1987-09-30
The court held that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint without prejudice, as the plaintiff made a reasonable, good-faith effort to comply with the court's orders regarding joinder and real party in interest.
-
756 F.2d 886·
1st Cir.·
1985-03-07
The court held that the district court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint to substitute the real party in interest.
-
509 F.2d 1321·
9th Cir.·
1975-01-23
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment against the plaintiff under Rule 17(a) when Rule 25(c) applied, and that the plaintiff should be allowed to prosecute the action due to the insurer's conflict of interest.
-
382 F.2d 945·
5th Cir.·
1967-09-12
The court held that the plaintiff could not recover on the instrument because the bank was merely a collection agent and not liable for non-payment of a sight draft attached to bonds, especially without allegations of damage.