-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-13
The court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the second amended complaint with prejudice and granted the motion to strike the supplemental second amended complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-02
The court held that a motion to vacate a dismissal order and for leave to amend a complaint is denied because the proposed amendment would be futile.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-31
The district court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint in a complex international hospitality case involving alleged injuries at an Iberostar hotel. The court found that jurisdictional discovery had been completed as contemplated in the schedul
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-28
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend its complaint, finding good cause due to Defendant's delayed disclosure of a lease agreement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-16
The court denied defendants' motion for leave to amend their answers and affirmative defenses because they failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-22
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss as moot.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-01
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint because the proposed claims for breach of contract and fraud were futile and insufficient on their face.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-27
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint because they failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in seeking the amendment after the deadline had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-12
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended complaint, allowing them to add a new defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-06
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss as moot.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-15
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-14
The court granted the parties' joint motion to amend their pleadings by interlineation to correct deficient jurisdictional allegations.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-08
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, finding she demonstrated good cause.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-23
A party seeking to amend its pleadings after a scheduling order deadline has passed must demonstrate good cause, which requires showing diligence in discovering the information supporting the amendment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-28
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint to substitute a specific individual for the "John Doe" defendant, finding that the proposed amendment did not constitute fraudulent joinder and that denying it would prejudice the plaintiff.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-07
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add a Rule B claim was denied because they failed to demonstrate diligence after the scheduling order deadline expired.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-17
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause to amend her complaint after the scheduling order deadline had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-12-12
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint and modify the scheduling order because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-14
The court granted leave to amend the counterclaim to cure pleading deficiencies, finding that while the proposed pleading was a shotgun pleading, it was not futile and the prior pleadings also suffered from similar issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-21
The court granted leave to amend to add claims against new defendants but denied leave to add a spoliation claim against the original defendant, finding it futile.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-31
The Court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a third amended complaint and granted in part his motions for clarification regarding the presiding judge and the prior dismissal order.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-08-05
The court held that leave to amend the complaint is granted in part to add claims related to Patent '567, but denied for claims related to sales to the U.S. Government and other companies.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-08
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order to add nineteen new defendants and extend pre-trial deadlines.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-20
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause to amend her complaint after the deadline to add parties had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-05
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint because all proposed amendments were futile.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-24
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated good cause to reopen the amendment period and satisfied the standard for leave to amend the pleadings, allowing the addition of a new defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-05
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause to amend the complaint after the deadline, and therefore the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint was denied.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-28
The court held that leave to file a second amended complaint is granted in part, allowing revisions to existing exemplar claims and party changes, but denying the addition of a new plaintiff due to futility.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-22
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, finding the futility arguments premature for this stage.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-21
The court granted the plaintiff's request for leave to amend his complaint, finding no substantial reason to deny it.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-26
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to substitute the legal names of the medical defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-06
The court granted the parties' joint motion to substitute the personal representative of the deceased defendant's estate as the defendant, treating it as a motion for leave to amend the complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-02-19
The court denied defendants' motion for leave to amend affirmative defenses because they failed to establish good cause for amending after the scheduling order deadline and did not demonstrate diligence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-04
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint was denied because she failed to demonstrate good cause for the untimely filing after the scheduling order deadline.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-06
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint should be granted, as good cause existed under Rule 16 and no substantial reason warranted denial under Rule 15.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-29
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint, allowing the addition of certain claims but denying the joinder of a new plaintiff due to jurisdictional issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-21
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated good cause to amend his complaint after the deadline, and the proposed amendments were not futile.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-15
The court held that leave to amend the complaint should be granted because the proposed second amended complaint cured previous deficiencies and was not futile.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-15
The court held that a defendant seeking to amend pleadings after a scheduling order deadline must first show good cause under Rule 16, and if shown, then demonstrate no substantial reason to deny amendment under Rule 15.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-05-14
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend its complaint to add a party defendant because the motion was filed after the deadline and Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause or diligence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-04-24
The court granted the defendant's motion for leave to amend its answer to add the affirmative defense of prior express consent.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-11
The court held that leave to amend a complaint should be denied if the amendment would be futile.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause for the late filing after the scheduling order deadline had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-12-27
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend its complaint and answer because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause or diligence after the deadline for amendments had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-10-16
The court held that a plaintiff must show good cause to amend a complaint after a scheduling order deadline has passed, and that seeking to amend only after a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is not sufficient diligence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-09-06
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion, vacating the default judgment and dismissing the defendant without prejudice, but denying the request to reopen the case and amend the complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-08-09
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint, finding that the proposed amendments were not futile and that justice required allowing the amendments.