-
192 F. Supp. 2d 1351·
M.D. Fla.·
2002-02-19
The court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, finding that the statute of limitations did not bar the claims and that the plaintiffs had standing and stated valid causes of action.
-
889 F. Supp. 465·
M.D. Fla.·
1995-06-23
The court held that individual employees cannot be sued for sexual harassment or retaliation under Title VII, but a defamation claim may proceed. Allegations of poisoning horses and shooting dogs were struck from the sexual harassment claim but allowed for the emotional distress
-
832 F. Supp. 1532·
S.D. Fla.·
1993-08-26
Third-party professionals are permitted to assert affirmative defenses against the RTC, and the RTC's motion to strike these defenses is denied.
-
138 F.2d 518·
1st Cir.·
1943-11-03
The court affirmed the judgment for the defendants, finding no reversible error in the trial court's rulings or jury charge.