Federal Rule Of Appellate Procedure 8(A)

11 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Loran W. Robbins v. The Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co.
  800 F.2d 641· 7th Cir.· 1986-07-11 ·cited 24×
  The Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act's (MPPAA) 'pay now, dispute later' scheme for withdrawal liability payments implicitly supersedes Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d)'s automatic stay provision.
• Grubb v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
  833 F.2d 222· 10th Cir.· 1987-11-10 ·cited 14×
  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), acting as receiver for an insolvent bank, is not entitled to exoneration of supersedeas bonds posted by the bank to stay execution of judgments pending appeal, even under 28 U.S.C. § 2408, because the bonds secure a specific judgm
• City OF Alexandria v. Helms
  728 F.2d 643· 4th Cir.· 1984-02-28 ·cited 13×
  The district court lacked jurisdiction to issue a preliminary injunction because the FAA's decision to authorize a temporary flight pattern test constituted a final order reviewable exclusively by the Courts of Appeals, and the National Environmental Policy Act did not provide an
• Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. E. AIR Lines, Inc.
  847 F.2d 1014· 2d Cir.· 1988-05-24 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing an injunction to preserve the jurisdiction of the system board of adjustment, even after an appeal was filed, especially when parties consented to treat the matter as a new action.
• Koger v. United States
  755 F.2d 1094· 4th Cir.· 1985-02-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the taxpayers' payment of the assessed deficiencies rendered their appeal moot, depriving the court of jurisdiction.
• The Populist Party v. Herschler
  746 F.2d 656· 10th Cir.· 1984-10-15 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding Wyoming's ballot access requirements for independent candidates and new political parties, thus denying their motion for an injunction pending appeal.
• Frith v. Blazon-Flexible Flyer, Inc.
  512 F.2d 899· 5th Cir.· 1975-05-08 ·cited 3×
  The court held that a district court judge cannot issue an injunction that contradicts a prior, unreviewable remand order by another judge in the same court.
• Mich. Coal. OF Radioactive Material Users, Inc. v. Griepentrog
  945 F.2d 150· 6th Cir.· 1991-09-24 ·cited 2×
  The court granted the defendants' motion for a stay of the district court's judgment pending appeal, finding they demonstrated a sufficient probability of success on the merits regarding personal jurisdiction and irreparable harm.
• City OF Alexandria v. Helms
  719 F.2d 699· 4th Cir.· 1983-10-13 ·cited 2×
  The court granted a stay of the injunction pending appeal, finding it unlikely the plaintiffs would prevail on the merits.
• Rakovich v. Wade
  834 F.2d 673· 7th Cir.· 1987-11-25 ·cited 1×
  A district court retains jurisdiction to grant a stay of its judgment pending appeal, even after a notice of appeal is filed or the court of appeals grants a rehearing en banc.
• Hernandez v. Dugger
  839 F. Supp. 849· M.D. Fla.· 1993-12-08
  The court granted the state's motion for a stay pending appeal, allowing the petitioner to remain incarcerated, despite the grant of a writ of habeas corpus.