Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(a)

18 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Tobias
  662 F.2d 381· 5th Cir.· 1981-11-30 ·cited 135×
  The dissenting judge argues that the DEA's extreme overinvolvement in the commission of the crime, from inception to completion, should preclude prosecution under the due process clause or the court's supervisory powers. The judge also contends the majority improperly disqualifie
• United States v. Drefke
  707 F.2d 978· 8th Cir.· 1983-05-13 ·cited 48×
  The court affirmed convictions for failure to file income tax returns and filing false withholding exemption certificates, finding all asserted grounds for appeal to be without merit.
• United States v. Kramer
  355 F.2d 891· 7th Cir.· 1966-01-10 ·cited 38×
  The court held that the defendants' convictions under the Hobbs Act and the Labor Management Relations Act were not inconsistent, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
• Lipscomb v. United States
  226 F.2d 812· 8th Cir.· 1955-11-08 ·cited 38×
  The court held that the trial court correctly denied the defendant's motions because the issues were barred by res judicata due to a prior affirmed decision on similar claims.
• United States v. David
  511 F.2d 355· D.C. Cir.· 1975-01-30 ·cited 30×
  The court held that the trial judge's inquiry into the defendant's waiver of his right to a jury trial was insufficient, and therefore remanded the case for a new trial.
• United States v. Stewart
  568 F.2d 501· 6th Cir.· 1978-01-05 ·cited 28×
  The court held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(d) is a petty offense, and thus defendants had no constitutional right to a jury trial.
• United States v. Pecora
  484 F.2d 1289· 3d Cir.· 1973-08-31 ·cited 28×
  The government has the right to appeal the dismissal of an indictment under the amended 18 U.S.C. § 3731, and the district court erred in dismissing the indictment because the receipt of money and gifts from employers by a union representative can violate 29 U.S.C. § 186(b) witho
• United States v. Roth
  333 F.2d 450· 2d Cir.· 1964-06-05 ·cited 20×
• United States v. Gordon
  712 F.2d 110· 5th Cir.· 1983-08-01 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the stop of the truck was constitutional based on reasonable suspicion, and the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for possession with intent to distribute, but insufficient for the conspiracy conviction.
• Mason v. United States
  250 F.2d 704· 10th Cir.· 1957-12-18 ·cited 14×
  The court held that a defendant does not have an absolute right to waive a jury trial, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to accept a nolo contendere plea or in its evidentiary rulings.
• United States v. Serfass
  492 F.2d 388· 3d Cir.· 1974-02-20 ·cited 10×
  The Court held that the government could appeal the district court's dismissal of the indictment because jeopardy had not attached, and that the dismissal was improper in light of Musser v. United States.
• United States v. Anderson
  704 F.2d 117· 3d Cir.· 1983-04-06 ·cited 9×
  A district court's failure to conduct a colloquy before accepting a written jury trial waiver in a criminal case does not mandate reversal, especially when the waiver is otherwise knowing and intelligent.
• Dranow v. United States
  325 F.2d 481· 8th Cir.· 1963-12-16 ·cited 8×
  A defendant's waiver of a jury trial is valid if voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made, even if a related charge is dismissed thereafter, provided the waiver itself was not coerced.
• Dixon v. United States
  292 F.2d 768· D.C. Cir.· 1961-06-08 ·cited 8×
  The court held that there is no absolute right to waive a jury trial in a criminal case; the government and court must also consent.
• United States v. Eulogio Ramiro Clausell
  389 F.2d 34· 2d Cir.· 1968-01-17 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying a continuance for the purpose of retaining new counsel and did not err by not explicitly advising the appellant of his right to proceed pro se.
• Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Raphael Parrott
  476 F.2d 1058· 3d Cir.· 1973-04-18 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the defendant's failure to demand a jury trial, as required by the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands, constituted a waiver of his right to a jury trial, even without an express written waiver.
• State v. Haynie
  37 Fla. Supp. 51· Fla. Cir. Ct.· 1972-05-09
  The state of Florida appealed a trial court's denial of its motion to require a jury trial after the defendant waived jury trial without the state's consent or knowledge. The court held that under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 1.260, the state must consent to any waiver of j
• Boufford v. United States
  239 F.2d 841· 1st Cir.· 1956-12-05
  The court held that while the defendant's answer to the marriage question might be considered factually false, the record did not conclusively establish that he 'knowingly' made a false statement, especially given potential ambiguity and advice of counsel.