-
655 F.2d 661·
5th Cir.·
1981-09-11
·cited 30×
The court held that a taxpayer alleging an IRS summons was issued solely for criminal prosecution is entitled to a limited adversary hearing to explore the IRS's institutional purpose, even without prior factual substantiation.
-
459 F.2d 287·
9th Cir.·
1972-04-20
·cited 24×
The court held that Idaho's long-arm statute did not provide jurisdiction over a South Dakota doctor for alleged malpractice occurring in South Dakota, even though the doctor mailed prescription copies to an Idaho resident.
-
702 F.2d 827·
9th Cir.·
1983-03-30
·cited 10×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the antitrust action, reversing the dismissal based on the statute of limitations and standing.
-
95 F.4th 1337·
11th Cir.·
2024-03-13
·cited 9×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to set aside the default because the defendant willfully defaulted by intentionally or recklessly disregarding judicial proceedings.
-
484 F.2d 634·
9th Cir.·
1973-09-04
·cited 6×
The court held that dismissals for lack of jurisdiction are not governed by Rule 41 and that a counterclaim must also be dismissed if the main claim lacks a justiciable controversy.
-
942 F.2d 655·
9th Cir.·
1991-08-20
·cited 4×
The district court was correct in its decision.
-
838 F. Supp. 567·
M.D. Fla.·
1993-11-16
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleged claims for sexual harassment, including quid pro quo and hostile work environment, and that there was a reasonable basis for a punitive damages claim.
-
767 F. Supp. 1563·
M.D. Fla.·
1991-05-17
·cited 1×
The court held that plaintiffs, as seamen with maritime liens for wages, had standing to contest the forfeiture of the seized vessel and that the administrative forfeiture was void due to the government's procedural failures, entitling plaintiffs to their claimed wages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-14
The court dismissed the complaint for improper service of process and as a shotgun pleading, granting the defendant's motion to dismiss.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-29
The court held that it has subject matter and personal jurisdiction and that no abstention doctrine applies, thus the motion to remand should be denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-14
The court granted plaintiffs' motion to declare defendant David Miscavige served with process under Florida Statutes sections 48.181 and 48.161, finding sufficient due diligence and jurisdictional basis, but denied the motion for default judgment, ordering Miscavige to respond to
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-24
GEICO sued Glassco Inc., a windshield repair shop, and its owners alleging they submitted fraudulent claims for reimbursement by inflating hours, listing unnecessary repairs, charging for unperformed work, and forging customer signatures, along with violating Florida's Motor Vehi
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-12
The court held that a clerk's default is not warranted when defendants have timely filed motions to dismiss.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-06
The Court held that the plaintiff's failure to properly serve the defendants was not excused by an attorney's appearance, and thus, the appeal of the dismissal for failure to prosecute would be frivolous.
-
861 F.2d 106·
5th Cir.·
1988-11-30
The court held that the FmHA's foreclosure procedures did not violate Boyd's Fifth Amendment due process rights, as he waived his opportunity for a hearing by failing to make a timely written request.