Extrajudicial Statements

78 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• White v. United States
  330 F.2d 993· 5th Cir.· 1964-04-28 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence, including the appellant's own extra-judicial statements corroborated by independent evidence, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt.
• Rogers v. United States
  129 F.2d 843· 10th Cir.· 1942-07-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence, including circumstantial facts and incriminating statements, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty.
• E.I. DU Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Aquamar, S.A.
  33 So. 3d 839· Fla. 4th DCA· 2010-05-19 ·cited 2×
  DuPont appeals a temporary injunction entered sua sponte by the trial court prohibiting all parties and counsel from disseminating out-of-court publicity about the case. The appellate court reversed, holding that the injunction lacked the required evidentiary support, findings of
• The News-Journal Corp. v. The Honorable S. James Foxman
  559 So. 2d 1227· Fla. 5th DCA· 1990-03-30 ·cited 2×
  The court granted certiorari in part, striking two provisions from a trial court's restrictive order on extrajudicial statements: the phrase 'and all persons affiliated therewith' as impermissibly vague, and the provision extending the order through final determination in trial c
• United States v. Wright
  433 F.2d 671· 8th Cir.· 1970-11-04 ·cited 2×
  The court held that while the prosecutor's questioning of an accomplice witness was improper, the conviction should be affirmed due to overwhelming independent evidence.
• Dalia Dippolito v. State
  225 So. 3d 233· Fla. 4th DCA· 2017-05-26 ·cited 1×
  Dalia Dippolito, charged with solicitation to commit murder, challenged a trial court gag order prohibiting all attorneys from making extrajudicial statements until jury selection in her third trial. The appellate court upheld the gag order, finding it supported by evidence of im
• The Florida Bar v. Leigh
  Fla.· 2025-03-20
  The Florida Bar sought disciplinary action against attorney Malik Leigh for professional misconduct across six counts involving federal litigation, a failed class action, false accusations against opposing counsel, threats on social media, and contempt of court orders. The Florid
• The Florida Bar v. Leigh
  Fla.· 2025-03-13
  The Florida Bar sought review of a disciplinary referee's recommendation to suspend attorney Malik Leigh for 91 days. The Florida Supreme Court found Leigh guilty of 24 rule violations stemming from misconduct in federal litigation and a state court class action, involving threat
• In re Hurley
  Del.· 2021-07-28
  The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's order of civil contempt against attorney Joseph A. Hurley. The Court held that Hurley's public statements, made in violation of a "Gag Order" restricting extrajudicial comments, created a substantial likelihood of materiall
• Delgado v. Miller
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2020-12-02
  The appellate court reviewed a trial court order that imposed restrictions on parties' speech in a family law case. The court found these restrictions, particularly those concerning social media comments and disclosure of financial information, constituted an unconstitutional pri
• Wright
  Del.· 2008-02-11
  The Superior Court jury's finding of guilt for two counts of delivery of cocaine is affirmed. The appellate court found that the uncharged co-conspirator's testimony independently established that the substance delivered was cocaine, thus satisfying the corpus delicti rule and pr
• Bludworth v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc.
  476 So. 2d 775· Fla. 4th DCA· 1985-10-16
  The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed orders requiring the state attorney to release criminal investigation materials to the news media under the Public Records Law, holding that documents disclosed to criminal defendants under discovery rules are not exempt from p
• Robbins v. State
  312 So. 2d 243· Fla. 2d DCA· 1975-04-23
  The court held that amnesia does not per se render a defendant incompetent to stand trial, and the state presented sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
• United States v. Mar. Inv. Corp.
  465 F.2d 434· 5th Cir.· 1972-08-23
  The court held that the trial court erred in denying relief based on the government's failure to prove capital impairment, as the SBIC's own report created a prima facie case.
• United States ex rel. Abraham Siegel v. Lennox
  460 F.2d 690· 3d Cir.· 1972-05-19
  The court held that even if a co-defendant's statement was improperly admitted in violation of Bruton, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt due to overwhelming properly admitted evidence of guilt.
• United States v. Allen
  449 F.2d 346· 9th Cir.· 1971-08-31
  The court held that the trial court did not err in refusing an identification instruction or admitting extrajudicial statements of witnesses.
• Kienlen v. United States
  437 F.2d 843· 10th Cir.· 1971-01-12
  The court held that the admission of extrajudicial statements from hospital records and a letter, without proper jury instructions, created a substantial risk that the jury considered them as evidence, violating the defendant's right to confrontation.
• Brinks v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.
  398 F.2d 889· 6th Cir.· 1968-07-29
  The court held that there was insufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury on theories of subsequent negligence regarding the train's brake or whistle.
• Budden v. British-America Assurance Co.
  312 F.2d 319· 9th Cir.· 1963-01-10
  A derivative liability of an insurer cannot be adjudicated in a garnishment proceeding without the primary obligor being a party to the action.