-
742 F.2d 314·
7th Cir.·
1984-07-30
·cited 36×
The court held that the temporary restraining order was improperly issued ex parte because there was no valid reason for proceeding without notice and it failed to comply with Rule 65(b)'s procedural requirements. The preliminary injunction was also deemed erroneously granted due
-
588 F.2d 1322·
10th Cir.·
1978-12-18
·cited 30×
A state court's erroneous order, even if violating due process, does not constitute "under color of law" for a § 1983 claim when private parties are involved and the state merely provides the forum.
-
155 So. 2d 422·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1963-07-19
·cited 24×
Roger Dean Chevrolet sought to enjoin a labor union from picketing its business. The trial court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction, finding the National Labor Relations Board had exclusive jurisdiction over the labor dispute. The court awarded the union attorneys' fees
-
606 F.2d 1·
2d Cir.·
1979-07-25
·cited 19×
A plaintiff is entitled to an ex parte temporary restraining order when a proper showing of immediate and irreparable injury is made and notice is impracticable, particularly in trademark infringement cases where confusion is likely.
-
843 F.2d 1311·
10th Cir.·
1988-04-06
·cited 8×
The court affirmed the preliminary injunction, holding that the district court had the authority under Colorado law to freeze assets unrelated to the alleged illegal conduct and that the FDIC demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
77 F. Supp. 2d 1263·
S.D. Fla.·
1999-06-30
·cited 1×
The court held that the defendants engaged in deceptive acts and practices and made false advertisements in violation of the FTC Act by making unsubstantiated weight loss claims and misrepresenting product endorsements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-09
iCore Midco Inc. and iCoreConnect Inc. sought an ex parte temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against PIGI Solutions, LLC and John Schneller to prevent a foreclosure auction sale of their personal property pursuant to a security agreement. The district court de
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-02
The court denied the ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient justification for proceeding without notice to the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-10-29
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to amend the temporary restraining order to correct a clerical error in identifying cryptocurrency wallet exchange locations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-07
The court granted in part and denied in part Petitioner's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order, prohibiting the removal of the child from the jurisdiction but denying the surrender of the Respondent's travel documents and temporary custody.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-18
The court recommends that the District Court enter the proposed order for a preliminary injunction based on the parties' joint stipulation.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-08
A temporary restraining order is appropriate where a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of a Lanham Act claim based on evidence of counterfeit goods bearing its registered marks, irreparable injury from loss of sales and erosion of good
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-13
The court denied the plaintiffs' ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the strict requirements for proceeding without notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(1).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-14
A temporary restraining order is appropriate under the Lanham Act when a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its infringement claim, irreparable injury absent immediate relief, that the threatened injury outweighs harm to the defendan
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-04-29
An ex parte temporary restraining order is affirmed when it is facially sufficient, and the appellant retains the right to move for its dissolution with a full hearing required before expiration.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-19
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was denied due to failure to meet procedural requirements.