-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-14
The court granted plaintiffs' renewed motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence for liability and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-07
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction due to the defendant's alleged infringement of the plaintiff's trademarks and failure to appear or respond.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-04
The court stated that if jurisdiction were returned, it would grant the motion to alter the judgment to specify the monetary award and award pre-judgment interest, as these were appropriate remedies.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-05-14
The court issued an order implementing a constructive trust remedy, resolving disputes over its scope and operation. The court declined to restrict defendants' ability to sell equity, excluded management fees from 'Proceeds' absent evidence of unfairness, and clarified that distr
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-01
The court granted the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-28
The court held that a breach of contract counterclaim and a recoupment counterclaim were sufficiently pleaded, but an accounting counterclaim was not. The court also struck one affirmative defense as improper and denied motions to strike others.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-31
The court denied defendants' post-trial motions, finding sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict on damages and claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, and aiding and abetting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-18
The court denied the motion for a stay pending appeal because the appellants failed to satisfy all four required factors, particularly the likelihood of irreparable harm.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-02-18
The Court entered an Order Granting Constructive Trust, establishing a constructive trust over "Proceeds" received by the defendants. The order defines key terms, outlines payment obligations to a court-appointed trustee, specifies how proceeds will be disbursed to plaintiffs, an
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-14
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to convert a temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction, finding that all four factors for injunctive relief weighed in the plaintiff's favor.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-12-31
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-27
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits of trademark and patent infringement claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-09-06
The court held that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on claims of deceptive trade practices, fraudulent inducement, breach of implied warranty, and rescission.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-15
The court held that the complaint was dismissed without prejudice because it lacked clarity regarding the plaintiffs' employment status and relationship to the Bonus Agreement's release clause, but granted leave to amend. The breach of fiduciary duty claim was sufficiently pleade
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-08-13
I cannot process this document. The court opinion provided is almost entirely blank pages with only a header identifying it as a case involving Atlas Conglomerate of Ridiculous Proportions LLC v. NFT Technologies, Inc., filed in the Southern District of Florida on August 13, 2024
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-29
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using plaintiff's trademarks and patents in connection with counterfeit products.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-15
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong probability of success on the merits and the likelihood of irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-02-12
The court held that a motion to withdraw a bankruptcy reference is premature if based solely on a potential jury trial right before the case is ready for trial.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-02-05
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for contempt and sanctions against Warehouse Holdings and McInerney for failing to comply with a court order enforcing a settlement, and granted default judgment against Level 1 Transport for issuing a worthless check.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-05
The court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's report, finding the defendant in civil contempt for willfully violating the terms of a prior injunction by preparing fraudulent tax returns.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-06
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the adidas trademarks and ordering the restraint of assets.
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-12-01
The Delaware Court of Chancery held that the defendants breached their voting commitment under the stockholders agreement by voting against a proposal to increase the company's authorized shares. The court found that the exceptions to the voting commitment did not apply and that
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-30
The court held that genuine disputes of material fact preclude summary judgment on the breach of oral contract claim due to disagreements over the contract price and performance. The court also found that the unjust enrichment claim could proceed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-18
The court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, adopting its findings and granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-11-08
Summary judgment was improper because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether the seller breached its contractual duty to deliver possession, occupancy, and marketable title, as the parties had fundamentally different interpretations of essential contract terms
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-29
The court granted summary judgment in part, finding the defendant breached her fiduciary duty as trustee and that her transfer of property was both actually and constructively fraudulent, while denying the claim for overdue distribution as a separate cause of action.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-21
Betty's Best, Inc. sued numerous online sellers across multiple e-commerce platforms (Amazon, eBay, Walmart, Wish, and others) for manufacturing, importing, and selling counterfeit grooming tools bearing infringing trademarks, copyrighted images, and design patents. The court gra
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-09-07
The court denied the SPAC's request for specific performance to compel the target company to close a de-SPAC transaction. Despite assuming the target breached its obligations and that money damages would be inadequate, the court found specific performance unavailable due to sever
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-07-31
The court denied the plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding that while there was a likelihood of success on the merits due to admitted defaults, the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm and the balance of equities weigh
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-27
The court granted summary judgment for reformation of the purchase agreement to include a party omitted by mutual mistake, and ordered specific performance of the contract, finding the plaintiff to be the prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
-
365 So. 3d 1222·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2023-06-30
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's decision to deny a man's counterclaim for equitable relief. The court held that the man could not recover assets he transferred to his former partner because he did so to evade creditors, specifically his ex-wife for child support, thu
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-14
The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-13
The court denied the motion to vacate, finding that the circumstances did not warrant vacatur of the summary judgment and final judgment, particularly given the public interest in preserving precedent and the collateral estoppel effects of the order.
-
11th Cir.·
2023-05-31
The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal by Empire Indemnity Insurance Company of a district court order compelling the insured condominium associations to submit their hurricane damage loss dispute to appraisal under the insurance policy's appraisal provision, holding that the o
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-19
The court held that an asset freeze must be limited to a reasonable approximation of recoverable profits and cannot be based on potential legal remedies like statutory damages.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-26
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining certain defendants from manufacturing, selling, or transferring infringing products and restraining their assets.
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-04-24
The court recommended judgment for the owner (Defendant) on the unjust enrichment counterclaim, awarding $44,000. The Plaintiff's claims for unjust enrichment and the Defendant's claim for trespass were recommended for denial. The court found the Plaintiff was unjustly enriched b
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-11
The court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding defendants liable for trademark infringement and unfair competition due to their sale of counterfeit goods.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-31
The court held that the plaintiffs' claims for quiet title, rescission, and unconscionable contract were dismissed, but the claims for declaratory judgment and usury could proceed to discovery. The request for punitive damages was denied.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2023-03-24
The Superior Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim, finding that the law of the case doctrine dictated that Delaware was the proper forum. However, the Court of Chancery lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plain
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-17
The court granted MCINC's application for a preliminary injunction, finding that MCINC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement and that immediate and irreparable harm would occur if the injunction were not granted.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2023-02-01
Paragraph 5 of the 2010 Settlement Agreement is unambiguous and clearly reserves to BCE perpetual ownership rights in any upland areas necessary to maintain its beach concession licenses. The trial court properly reformed the 2013 special warranty deed by mutual mistake to reserv
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-01-05
The Court of Chancery recommends granting the Buyer's motion for summary judgment and denying the Sellers' motion. The Court found that a valid and enforceable contract existed between the parties, that the Sellers' performance was not excused, and that the Buyer was entitled to
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-12-30
A court cannot award attorney's fees to a third-party buyer in a foreclosure redemption context unless expressly authorized by statute, rule, or contract.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-12-07
The court adopted in part the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting a permanent injunction, a five-year penny stock bar, and ordering disgorgement, while modifying the scope of the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-27
The sales compensation plans did not constitute contracts because they lacked explicit agreement language and contained disclaimers of guaranteed compensation, thus barring breach of contract claims.
-
352 So. 3d 33·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-06-29
The appellate court reversed a foreclosure judgment, finding that the lender presented insufficient evidence to prove the amounts owed. The court also addressed the default interest rate, holding that the trial court erred by modifying the unambiguous terms of the note based on e
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-24
Plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial because it seeks both legal remedies (actual damages via royalties) and equitable remedies (disgorgement of profits).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-16
The court granted the defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, finding the evidence legally insufficient to support the jury's damages award for unjust enrichment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-09
Luxury goods manufacturers Richemont International SA and related companies sued multiple individuals and entities operating online e-commerce stores on Amazon, DHgate, eBay, and Wish for selling counterfeit versions of their trademarked watches, jewelry, and accessories includin