-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-30
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff satisfied the requirements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-21
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for patent infringement.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2023-06-20
The court granted in part the plaintiff's application for costs, prejudgment interest, and post-judgment interest. Pretrial expenses like special master and mediator fees were denied as costs. Technology fees for trial presentations were awarded, but not for pretrial preparation
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-19
The court held that an asset freeze must be limited to a reasonable approximation of recoverable profits and cannot be based on potential legal remedies like statutory damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-02
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, finding that the defendant had not demonstrated clear legal prejudice and that the case had achieved its intended purpose of bringing the defendant into ADA compliance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-24
The court held that the petitioner is presumptively entitled to recover necessary expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, under the Hague Convention and ICARA, as the respondent failed to meet her burden of proving that an award would be clearly inappropriate.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-08-23
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss without prejudice, conditioned on the plaintiffs reimbursing the defendant for all costs and attorney's fees if the action is refiled.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-16
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for enhanced damages, finding that the case did not warrant such an award despite a finding of willful infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-31
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice, conditioned on the plaintiff paying the defendant's costs and attorney's fees if the case is refiled.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-08
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with local rules and that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm due to significant delay.
-
12 F.4th 1355·
11th Cir.·
2021-09-10
Compensatory education is not an automatic remedy for a procedural child-find violation under the IDEA; a party must demonstrate that the violation caused a substantive educational harm that can be remedied by compensatory services.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-23
The court granted the United States' Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction, enjoining defendants from violating Internal Revenue employment tax reporting and payment requirements.
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-04-25
The Court of Chancery granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss. Claims related to the "Founder's Shares" were dismissed as barred by laches due to the plaintiff's unreasonable delay and lack of vigilance. Claims related to the "Forman Options" based on
-
266 So. 3d 1267·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2019-03-22
Florida appellate court reversed attorney's fees award to construction contractor because both parties prevailed on significant issues, making it inequitable to award fees to either party.
-
9th Cir. Ct. App. Div.·
2016-02-04
Michael Navarro challenged his suspension from University of Central Florida for stalking his ex-girlfriend after their breakup. The Ninth Judicial Circuit Court rejected his claims that he was denied due process due to an ex parte communication and that UCF's stalking definition
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-01-25
The Delaware Court of Chancery found that the defendant breached the joint venture agreement and fiduciary duties by usurping corporate opportunities. The court interpreted the agreement broadly, finding that the defendant's actions in acquiring companies within the joint venture
-
Del. Ch.·
2011-02-09
The Court denied Defendant's motion to reopen the record, finding the newly discovered email was not material enough to likely change the outcome and would cause prejudice. The Court also denied Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, concluding that it failed to demonstrate over
-
Del. Ch.·
2009-06-25
The Court of Chancery reversed Class Counsel's exclusion of several objectors from a class action settlement. The court found that equitable principles required waiving strict adherence to deadlines and requirements in cases of excusable neglect, substantial compliance, or admini
-
Del. Ch.·
2008-08-19
The Court held that petitioners lacked standing to seek dissolution or winding up of the Pandora Entities because they were not members or managers of those entities. For the Waiver Entities, the Court found that the petitioners, as members, had contractually waived their rights
-
Del. Ch.·
2007-05-30
The Delaware Court of Chancery granted a motion to stay proceedings in a petition for judicial dissolution of a Delaware corporation, finding that a prior-filed action in Canada involving similar parties and issues was capable of rendering prompt and complete justice. The court e
-
510 F. Supp. 2d 868·
M.D. Fla.·
2007-04-26
The court held that the USDA's emergency interim rule was promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act's notice and comment requirements, but exercised equitable discretion to keep the rule in place pending new rulemaking.
-
Del. Ch.·
2003-08-13
The Court of Chancery granted the plaintiff's motion to compel an annual stockholders meeting and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss. The court held that merely designating a meeting date within thirteen months is insufficient if the meeting itself occurs after the deadline
-
622 So. 2d 581·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1993-08-06
The FDIC appealed a trial court's post-judgment order that rescheduled a foreclosure sale and required the FDIC to pay condominium assessments on the property being foreclosed. The court reversed the portion of the order requiring assessment payments, finding the trial court abus
-
984 F.2d 223·
7th Cir.·
1993-01-26
The court held that the district court properly construed the stock purchase agreement to require the transfer of 100% of EPI stock and that specific performance was an appropriate remedy for the breach.
-
973 F.2d 664·
8th Cir.·
1992-08-25
The court held that claims of constructive discharge and wage discrimination were properly before the court, and that the district court did not err in finding sex discrimination, calculating back pay, or denying prejudgment interest.
-
868 F.2d 1279·
Temp. Emer. Ct. App.·
1989-01-27
Prejudgment interest is not available for unliquidated damages in a case brought under § 210(a) of the Economic Stabilization Act.
-
625 F.2d 1112·
3d Cir.·
1980-07-11
The court held that the reorganization court did not abuse its equitable discretion in continuing the $50,000 limitation on Bevan's claims, as the differential impact did not constitute unlawful discrimination and the court properly considered all circumstances.
-
514 F.2d 279·
D.C. Cir.·
1975-01-20
The court affirmed the FCC's orders revoking the licenses, finding substantial evidence supported the factual findings and the conclusions were free from reversible legal error.
-
289 So. 2d 426·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1974-01-22
The court held that the husband's actions in withholding support payments did not constitute a repudiation of the property settlement agreement by the wife, thus the agreement remained enforceable.
-
479 F.2d 591·
4th Cir.·
1973-05-23
The First Amendment does not require a prior adversary judicial hearing before government authorities seize single copies of allegedly obscene publications for use as evidence in criminal prosecutions.
-
34 Fla. Supp. 148·
Lake Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1970-04-08
The court held that a contract for the sale of land signed by some owners, but expressly conditioned on all owners signing, is not binding on any owner until all have signed, especially when the buyer had notice of this condition.
-
262 F.2d 20·
D.C. Cir.·
1958-11-20
The court held that a stipulation to be bound by test cases, coupled with contribution to litigation costs, can authorize an equitable award of attorney's fees even without a formal attorney-client relationship.
-
253 F.2d 377·
5th Cir.·
1958-03-12
The court held that the district court erred in exercising jurisdiction and issuing an injunction, as the case involved a rate order affecting a public utility and a plain, speedy, and efficient remedy was available in state courts.
-
99 So. 2d 727·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1958-01-15
The court held that the chancellor did not err in refusing specific performance and ordering the return of deposit money, as the buyer's delay and speculative intent were fatal to the claim.
-
176 F.2d 937·
3d Cir.·
1949-09-29
The court held that a court of equity has the discretion to prioritize necessary current operating expenses of a railroad receiver over outstanding certificates of indebtedness issued for capital expenditures, especially when such prioritization is necessary to maintain the railr
-
160 Fla. 773·
Fla.·
1948-07-30
-
133 F.2d 228·
8th Cir.·
1942-12-23
The court held that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief.
-
122 F.2d 326·
8th Cir.·
1941-07-21
The court held that while tax claims and most operating expenses have priority, an employee's personal injury claim arising during receivership possesses superior equities and should be granted priority over general commercial operating expenses.
-
113 Fla. 302·
Fla.·
1933-12-19
In an original prohibition proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court upheld a circuit court's authority to order payment of a guardian ad litem's compensation and appeal expenses out of receivership funds held in a foreclosure suit, even though the insane defendant's ultimate ownersh
-
110 Fla. 227·
Fla.·
1933-05-13
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a foreclosure action brought by a bank liquidator against a mortgagor's property where a judgment creditor held a superior legal title acquired through an earlier execution sale. The court held that the mortgaged land was exempt