-
482 F.2d 1148·
8th Cir.·
1973-08-02
The court held that the petitioner failed to comply with regulatory provisions for withdrawal of approval and did not exhaust administrative remedies, and the Commissioner had authority to withdraw the NADAs.
-
471 F.2d 23·
2d Cir.·
1972-12-29
A registrant cannot claim improper induction order based on minor or technical violations of Selective Service regulations by the local board.
-
467 F.2d 572·
1st Cir.·
1972-10-19
A violation of Selective Service regulations as applied to third parties does not constitute a deprivation of due process for a registrant unless the violation was intended to favor another or discriminate against the registrant, or was so flagrant that fair administration is com
-
458 F.2d 152·
C.C.P.A.·
1972-05-04
The court held that the appellant was not prejudiced by failing to receive a notice from the Patent Office regarding a deficiency in its submitted testimony, as the appellant was aware of the deficiency and the Board's decision did not rely on that specific defect.
-
455 F.2d 945·
6th Cir.·
1972-02-24
The court held that the Army's discharge procedures comported with applicable statutes and constitutional provisions, and the evidence constituted substantial evidence to support the discharge.
-
454 F.2d 1368·
Ct. Cl.·
1972-02-18
The court held that a limited remand for trial on the issue of bias was inappropriate and likely to prolong litigation unnecessarily.
-
438 F.2d 141·
D.C. Cir.·
1970-11-20
The court held that the FCC's reconsideration of a program exclusivity decision, based on late-filed evidence and without proper opportunity for the other party to respond, violated administrative due process and finality principles.
-
395 F.2d 750·
6th Cir.·
1968-05-10
The court granted the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order.
-
390 F.2d 760·
C.C.P.A.·
1968-02-15
-
27 Fla. Supp. 27·
Fla. P.S.C.·
1966-07-28
The Florida Public Service Commission voided a hearing on an application by Sightsea Tours to operate a sightseeing service in Broward County because the Commission erroneously published notice stating the service territory was in Dade County, failed to notify required Broward Co
-
348 F.2d 154·
10th Cir.·
1965-06-28
The court held that the Jilkas' second action was untimely because it was filed more than 15 days after the mailing of the initial adverse decision, and neither the statutes nor regulations provided for an extension of time based on a motion to reopen.
-
308 F.2d 648·
D.C. Cir.·
1962-09-27
The court held that the Atomic Energy Commission has the statutory authority to license the receipt, storage, and disposal of low-level radioactive waste, and that the city was afforded adequate due process.
-
302 F.2d 908·
D.C. Cir.·
1962-05-03
The court held that the Board's findings of unfair labor practices were supported by substantial evidence and that the company's refusal to bargain was a direct cause of the strike, making it an unfair labor practice strike.
-
298 F.2d 323·
D.C. Cir.·
1962-01-04
The court held that deportation orders based on unverified and unauthenticated documents are invalid.
-
18 Fla. Supp. 153·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1961-08-17
Police officers challenged their suspensions imposed by the city manager despite being found not guilty by the civil service board. The court held that when a city manager refers suspension charges to the civil service board for a hearing, he is bound by the board's findings supp
-
121 So. 2d 196·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1960-06-06
Rose B. Moore, a real estate broker, petitioned for certiorari to review the Florida Real Estate Commission's revocation of her registration. The court denied her petition, finding that although the examiner failed to comply with statutory procedural requirements, Moore was not p
-
264 F.2d 695·
5th Cir.·
1959-03-10
The court held that the Housing Authority abused its discretion by arbitrarily rejecting the lowest bidder without providing an opportunity to be heard on charges of irresponsibility.
-
255 F.2d 50·
9th Cir.·
1958-04-28
The court held that the denial of the alien's application for adjustment of immigration status, based on the finding of unlawful entry due to intent to reside, presented a substantial issue that warranted trial.
-
247 F.2d 103·
D.C. Cir.·
1957-06-27
The Attorney General's decision reversing the Board's favorable decision was not made in accordance with law because the appellant was deprived of notice and an opportunity to be heard.
-
211 F.2d 428·
D.C. Cir.·
1954-03-11
The court held that the Board of Pharmacy lacked authority to entertain a pharmacist's license renewal application filed more than five years after the license expired, as the application was untimely under the governing statute.
-
210 F.2d 113·
8th Cir.·
1954-02-03
The court affirmed the district court's approval of the reorganization plan, finding no merit in the appellants' challenges regarding valuation, evidence, statutory compliance, and fairness to stockholders.
-
160 F.2d 285·
D.C. Cir.·
1947-03-10
The court held that the Commission's denial of the broadcasting license was not arbitrary or capricious, as the applicant's officers demonstrated a willingness to deceive the Commission through evasive and contradictory statements regarding financial matters and stock ownership.
-
159 F.2d 867·
Emer. Ct. App.·
1947-02-17
The court held that the Price Administrator's dismissal of the complainant's protest was correct because the complainant was not subject to the regulation's provisions.
-
150 F.2d 629·
2d Cir.·
1945-07-11
The court affirmed the FTC's order, finding that the company's advertising claims for its tablets were unsubstantiated and that the company was not prejudiced by procedural rulings.
-
147 Fla. 695·
Fla.·
1941-07-08
The court held that the State Board of Medical Examiners could not revoke a physician's license based on an accusation that did not allege a violation of the statute, nor could it act solely on the conclusions of another board without independent evidence.
-
19th Cir. Ct. App. Div.·
A quasi-judicial administrative board's decision to order abandonment of an unpermitted sewage system and cessation of commercial use until approved systems are installed is supported by competent, substantial evidence and does not violate procedural due process or the essential