Confrontation And Cross-Examination

20 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Hyser v. Reed
  318 F.2d 225· D.C. Cir.· 1963-04-11 ·cited 203×
  Parolees are entitled to a hearing at a geographically reasonable location but not to appointed counsel, compulsory process, or confrontation in all cases.
• Larry v. Lawler
  605 F.2d 954· 7th Cir.· 1978-08-18 ·cited 48×
  The court held that the applicant was afforded due process and the Commission's findings were justified.
• Clutchette v. Procunier
  510 F.2d 613· 9th Cir.· 1974-10-21 ·cited 40×
• United States v. Byrd
  898 F.2d 450· 5th Cir.· 1990-04-04 ·cited 38×
  The court held that conduct charged in dismissed counts, even if denied by the defendant, can be considered 'relevant conduct' for sentencing under the Sentencing Guidelines if it is part of the same course of conduct or common scheme as the offense of conviction, and the evidenc
• The Everglades Protective Syndicate, Inc. v. Makinney
  391 So. 2d 262· Fla. 4th DCA· 1980-11-26 ·cited 35×
  The Everglades Club appealed an order compelling it to answer interrogatories in a mandamus proceeding brought by a member seeking reinstatement after expulsion. The court held that interrogatories seeking details about complaints against the member were not relevant to the issue
• Auckland Holmes v. United States Bd. OF Parole & United States Bureau of Prisons
  541 F.2d 1243· 7th Cir.· 1976-09-10 ·cited 32×
  A federal prisoner is entitled to procedural due process before being classified as a "Special Offender" because this designation significantly impacts opportunities for parole, furlough, and transfer, constituting a "grievous loss."
• Intercontinental Indus., Inc. v. Am. Stock Exch. & Sec. & Exch. Comm'n
  452 F.2d 935· 5th Cir.· 1971-12-20 ·cited 24×
  The court affirmed the SEC's order allowing the American Stock Exchange to delist INI's stock, finding that INI violated its listing agreement by disseminating misleading information and that its corrective actions were not prompt.
• Simmons v. Braun
  627 F.2d 635· 2d Cir.· 1980-08-14 ·cited 19×
  The exclusionary rule does not apply to extradition hearings, and the evidence presented was sufficient for extraditability.
• Inmates OF the Nebraska Penal AND Correctional Complex v. Greenholtz
  576 F.2d 1274· 8th Cir.· 1978-05-18 ·cited 19×
  The Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies to parole release determinations, requiring certain procedural safeguards. However, the full panoply of rights afforded in criminal prosecutions is not required.
• Petition for Revision
  103 So. 2d 873· Fla.· 1956-07-13 ·cited 14×
  The Florida Supreme Court granted a petition to amend the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar to authorize disciplinary proceedings against attorneys who join the Communist Party, while rejecting proposed rules that would treat invocation of the Fifth Amendment as prima facie evi
• Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Robinson
  93 So. 3d 1090· Fla. 2d DCA· 2012-06-27 ·cited 13×
  The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles appealed a circuit court decision that invalidated Robinson's driver's license suspension after the arresting officer failed to appear at an administrative review hearing. The Second District Court of Appeal denied the p
• Grice v. City OF Kissimmee & Kissimmee Police Dep't
  697 So. 2d 186· Fla. 5th DCA· 1997-07-18 ·cited 12×
  Two police officers challenged their terminations by the City of Kissimmee, claiming denial of procedural due process. The court held that police officers have a property interest in their employment and are entitled to post-termination due process rights, including the opportuni
• Rivera v. Marcus
  696 F.2d 1016· 2d Cir.· 1982-12-23 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the state must ensure children's best interests are the foremost consideration when removing them from parental care, and parents must have a fair opportunity to participate in hearings concerning custody.
• Bryon D. Park v. City OF W. Melbourne
  927 So. 2d 5· Fla. 5th DCA· 2006-02-17 ·cited 9×
  Police officer Park was discharged for dishonesty following an investigation into his involvement with a psychic hotline call made from a police department phone. After the hearing officer ordered his reinstatement with back pay, the City challenged the ruling. The appellate cour
• States Marine Lines, Inc. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States
  376 F.2d 230· D.C. Cir.· 1967-03-08 ·cited 8×
  The court held that while complainant secrecy is permissible, the self-policing system's failure to provide adequate safeguards against the use of secret evidence against an accused member renders it unfair. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.
• Meryl Meder v. City OF Okla. City
  869 F.2d 553· 10th Cir.· 1989-03-07 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the employee received adequate procedural due process regarding his termination, even if a property interest existed, and that his liberty interest claim also failed.