Concealment Of Property

16 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Harris
  388 F.2d 373· 7th Cir.· 1967-12-13 ·cited 24×
• Kan. Fed. Credit Union v. Niemeier
  227 F.2d 287· 10th Cir.· 1955-10-14 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the bankrupt's actions did not constitute grounds for denying his discharge, affirming the lower court's decision.
• United States v. Jackson
  836 F.2d 324· 7th Cir.· 1987-12-29 ·cited 18×
  The court held that Miranda warnings are not required in bankruptcy proceedings and that false statements regarding the location of collateral are material even if a subsequent security agreement is alleged.
• Coghlan v. United States
  147 F.2d 233· 8th Cir.· 1945-02-14 ·cited 12×
  The court held that omitting substantial assets from bankruptcy schedules, even by an attorney acting as an agent, constitutes concealment under the Bankruptcy Act, and the evidence supported the conviction.
• Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye V. Peterson
  400 F.2d 336· 8th Cir.· 1968-08-26 ·cited 10×
  The court held that a bankrupt's refusal to answer questions about his property in court-ordered supplementary proceedings, when he had assets and no valid Fifth Amendment basis for refusal, constituted an act of bankruptcy as a matter of law. The court also held that the attorne
• United States v. Grant
  971 F.2d 799· 1st Cir.· 1992-07-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the "relation back" doctrine under the Bankruptcy Act does not apply to criminal concealment charges under the Bankruptcy Code, and sufficient evidence supported the conviction for concealing property from the bankruptcy estate.
• Williamson v. Williams
  137 F.2d 298· 4th Cir.· 1943-07-29 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the bankrupt committed offenses punishable by imprisonment under the Bankruptcy Act by concealing assets and making a false oath, thus warranting denial of discharge.
• Tedder v. State
  73 Fla. 861· Fla.· 1917-04-06 ·cited 6×
  E.J. Tedder was convicted of grand larceny for allegedly stealing twelve hogs. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the conviction, holding that the defendant's open and undenied taking of the hogs, combined with his open sale of them and claim of ownership, raised a presumption ag
• In re Saphire
  139 F.2d 34· 2d Cir.· 1943-11-02 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the referee's findings that the bankrupt concealed property with intent to defraud creditors.
• Raettig v. State
  406 So. 2d 1273· Fla. 1st DCA· 1981-12-09 ·cited 4×
  In this drug case, the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed the conviction and suppression denial, holding that a deputy's warrantless observation of marijuana through a small crack in a camper truck violated the defendant's reasonable expectation of privacy. The court rejec
• Viles v. United States
  193 F.2d 776· 10th Cir.· 1952-01-07 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the petition lacked sufficient factual allegations to grant jurisdiction for expunging the indictment, verdict, and probation order.
• Kaganowitz v. Mfrs. Tr. Co.
  145 F.2d 754· 2d Cir.· 1944-12-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that concealing a debtor's right to future earnings, which are subject to garnishment or installment payment orders under New York law, constitutes concealment of 'property' within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act, thus providing grounds to deny a discharge.
• In re Brinson
  S.D. Fla.· 1925-02-02 ·cited 1×
  In a bankruptcy discharge proceeding, the court addressed whether objections filed by a creditor were sufficiently pleaded to bar discharge. The court held that while some objections were deficient in form or specificity, others alleging concealment of property and false oaths in
• In re Cornucopia Gold Mines, Inc.
  267 F.2d 334· 3d Cir.· 1959-05-21
  The court held that the validity of petitioning creditors' claims was satisfactorily established and that evidence regarding acts of bankruptcy called for jury consideration.
• In re Chase v. Local Loan Co.
  141 F.2d 299· 7th Cir.· 1944-02-19
  A bankrupt's failure to disclose the disposition of exempt property does not constitute grounds for denying a discharge, even if the omission was intentional.