Cleveland Board Of Education V. Loudermill

59 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Hunt v. City of Mulberry
  173 F. Supp. 2d 1288· M.D. Fla.· 2001-02-08
  The court held that the plaintiff's federal due process claims failed because he received adequate pre- and post-termination procedures and available state remedies, and that state-created employment rights are not protected by substantive due process. The court declined suppleme
• Suber v. Seminole Cnty.
  78 F. Supp. 2d 1298· M.D. Fla.· 1999-03-17
  Summary judgment is granted for the County because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies for her age discrimination claim, did not establish pretext for her termination, and her due process claims fail as a matter of law.
• DeVITO v. Chicago Park Dist.
  972 F.2d 851· 7th Cir.· 1992-08-18
  The court held that a one-year delay in a post-termination hearing, while without pay, did not violate due process rights when a pre-termination hearing was provided and the delay was attributed to an administrative bottleneck.
• Aronson v. Gressly
  961 F.2d 907· 10th Cir.· 1992-04-08
  The court held that the plaintiff's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim was timely filed because the Mohasco limitation reducing the filing period does not apply to the ADEA. The court also held that the plaintiff received adequate procedural due process prior to her termi
• Zinker v. Doty
  907 F.2d 357· 2d Cir.· 1990-06-29
  The court held that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because the constitutional requirements for a pre-termination hearing for classified state employees were not clearly established prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Cleveland Board of Education v. Louder
• Cremeans v. City OF Roseville
  861 F.2d 878· 6th Cir.· 1988-10-28
  The court held that the plaintiff received constitutionally adequate process, and the trial court erred in submitting the § 1983 claim to the jury.
• Twist v. Meese
  854 F.2d 1421· D.C. Cir.· 1988-08-23
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting summary judgment for the government because the plaintiff failed to present evidence that his protected speech was a substantial or motivating factor in his termination, and that the district court pr
• Linda J. Darnell (Rose) v. Dep't of Transp.
  807 F.2d 943· Fed. Cir.· 1986-11-26
  The denial of a pretermination hearing, even if considered harmless error by the majority, violated petitioners' due process rights.