-
193 So. 2d 701·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1967-01-05
·cited 34×
Three consolidated appeals challenging a summary judgment that barred negligence claims against a deceased's estate for non-compliance with Florida's statutory claims procedure. The court held that an insurance company's extended settlement negotiations can create an equitable es
-
246 F.2d 410·
7th Cir.·
1957-06-20
·cited 20×
The court held that a state probate court decree, obtained through a non-adversary proceeding where the United States was not a party, is not binding on the IRS regarding federal estate tax liability.
-
439 So. 2d 280·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1983-09-23
·cited 14×
State Farm sought reimbursement for an insurance overpayment made to a hospital on behalf of a deceased insured, but filed the claim after the statutory deadline. The court held that State Farm's claim, arising after the decedent's death, was not subject to the nonclaim statute a
-
459 So. 2d 1082·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1984-09-26
·cited 11×
Gates Learjet Corporation sought to quash summary judgments granted against its crossclaims for contribution against the estates of two pilots who died in a Learjet crash. The court held that Florida's non-claim statute bars contribution claims against deceased tortfeasors' estat
-
575 So. 2d 239·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1991-02-06
·cited 10×
Ben and Winston Carlton appealed the dismissal of their complaint alleging intentional interference with their expectancies in their parents' estates by their deceased brother Mabry Carlton. The court reversed, holding that a cause of action for tortious interference with expecte
-
520 So. 2d 99·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1988-02-17
·cited 10×
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision to vacate an order of family administration that had named the decedent's mother as sole heir, instead recognizing his illegitimate daughter Nicole as the sole heir after establishing his paternity th
-
186 So. 2d 796·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1966-05-24
·cited 8×
This case involves an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a second amended complaint filed against a decedent's estate, concerning a property settlement agreement and allegations of fraud.
-
257 F.2d 313·
7th Cir.·
1958-07-01
·cited 6×
The court held that a federal court in a diversity action must apply the forum state's statute of limitations, even if it bars the claim.
-
178 F.2d 570·
6th Cir.·
1949-12-12
·cited 6×
The court held that the amended complaint sufficiently alleged an actual controversy, and the district court erred in dismissing the declaratory judgment action based on untimeliness of amendments and lack of controversy.
-
150 Fla. 471·
Fla.·
1942-05-01
·cited 6×
The court held that an amendment to an answer seeking new, independent, and inconsistent relief, particularly claims against an estate, is improper and should be stricken.
-
326 So. 3d 143·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2021-08-04
·cited 2×
This case concerns whether claims against a deceased tortfeasor's estate and their insurer are time-barred. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that claims against the estate and the employer (vicariously liable) were time-barred under Florida's Proba
-
29 So. 3d 1155·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2010-02-12
·cited 2×
The personal representative of an estate sought to strike a creditor's claim as untimely under Florida's probate statute, which requires claims be filed within 30 days of notice. The probate court denied the petition because service was made on the creditor's personal injury atto
-
502 So. 2d 1295·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1987-02-20
·cited 2×
The court held that the appellant's claim against the estate was untimely filed and that the trial court properly struck the claim and denied the motion for an extension of time.
-
22 Fla. Supp. 196·
Duval Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1964-04-06
·cited 2×
In this execution and creditor's rights case, the court held that mere publication of a notice of sale without any other overt act does not constitute a valid levy on real property subject to execution. Additionally, the court interpreted Florida Statute 733.19 to require that wh
-
Del. Ch.·
2005-02-23
The court held that property held in constructive trust by a decedent is not part of the decedent's estate and thus not subject to the estate's statute of limitations. The court also held that while a three-year statute of limitations applies to breach of fiduciary duty claims, a
-
159 F. Supp. 2d 1371·
M.D. Fla.·
2001-03-05
The United States is not bound by state statutes of limitations when asserting claims in its governmental capacity, and a Certificate of Assessments and Payments is presumptive proof of a valid tax assessment.
-
316 F.2d 675·
D.C. Cir.·
1963-03-21
The court held that a probate court lacks jurisdiction to compel executors to pay attorney fees directly; it can only allow such fees in the executors' accounts.