Claim For Equitable Relief

13 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Elbert B. Connell v. Dulien Steel Prods., Inc.
  240 F.2d 414· 5th Cir.· 1957-01-18 ·cited 54×
  The court held that the temporary restraining order, even if improperly extended, was not an appealable interlocutory injunction and that the appeal was premature.
• Oldham v. Eldin J. Ehrlich
  617 F.2d 163· 8th Cir.· 1980-03-12 ·cited 42×
  The court held that a substantial constitutional claim provided federal jurisdiction for pendent statutory claims, and that attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 should not be reduced because the attorneys worked for a legal aid organization.
• Paragon Energy Corp. v. The United States
  645 F.2d 966· Ct. Cl.· 1981-04-08 ·cited 35×
  The court held that a claim for equitable reformation of a contract due to a unilateral bid mistake, based on established equitable principles, constitutes a cognizable claim under the Contract Disputes Act, even if such mistakes are also remediable under Public Law 85-804.
• Hill v. Trs. OF Ind. Univ.
  537 F.2d 248· 7th Cir.· 1976-04-05 ·cited 20×
• The MacKe Co. v. The United States
  467 F.2d 1323· Ct. Cl.· 1972-10-13 ·cited 16×
  The court held that the contractor was entitled to compensation for unreasonable losses inherent in the unique operation, beyond those directly caused by the government, and also to a reasonable profit.
• Butler v. Lomelo
  355 So. 2d 1208· Fla. 4th DCA· 1977-11-09 ·cited 12×
  Eight firefighters challenged their furlough by the City of Sunrise, claiming denial of due process and seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as damages for mental anguish. The trial court denied equitable relief but a jury awarded damages including compensation for
• Fendler v. United States Parole Comm'n
  774 F.2d 975· 9th Cir.· 1985-10-22 ·cited 11×
  The court held that presentence reports are agency records subject to FOIA, but remanded for consideration of exemption (3). It also affirmed dismissal of other claims, including Bivens claims due to immunity.
• Watson v. Ark. Nat'l Guard
  886 F.2d 1004· 8th Cir.· 1989-09-22 ·cited 10×
  Civilian courts cannot review intra-military personnel disputes, including claims for injunctive relief, due to the need to preserve military discipline and Congress's plenary authority over the military.
• Yager v. Liberty Royalties Corp.
  123 F.2d 44· 10th Cir.· 1941-10-22 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the statute of limitations was tolled during the period when one individual controlled both the claimant trust and the debtor corporation, and thus the claim was not barred.
• People OF the State OF Cal. v. Dep't OF THE Navy
  624 F.2d 885· 9th Cir.· 1980-06-02 ·cited 2×
  State air pollution regulations for aircraft engine test cells are not preempted by the Clean Air Act if they can be met without affecting the engine's design, structure, operation, or performance.
• Tatem Mfg. Co. v. The United States
  386 F.2d 898· Ct. Cl.· 1967-11-09 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a contract implied in fact with the government, and therefore, the government was not liable for the plaintiff's losses.
• Williams v. Aloisi
  271 B.R. 676· M.D. Fla.· 2002-01-15 ·cited 1×
  The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of relief from the automatic stay but reversed and remanded the denial of equitable relief against the debtor's home, requiring further findings on the debtor's knowledge of the use of stolen funds.