Certiorari Review Of Non-Final Orders

66 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Delta Aggregate, LLC v. Hermes Hialeah Warehouse, LLC
  266 So. 3d 248· Fla. 4th DCA· 2019-03-06 ·cited 1×
  The appellate court granted certiorari review and quashed a lower court's order denying a motion to discharge a lis pendens. The court found that the claim for an equitable lien, which supported the lis pendens, lacked the required "fair nexus" to the property and that the plaint
• Akhnoukh A. Akhnoukh and Simon Bishoy Akhnoukh v. Benvenuto
  219 So. 3d 96· Fla. 2d DCA· 2017-04-19 ·cited 1×
  In a negligence action arising from a motor vehicle accident, the court granted certiorari relief and quashed a trial court's protective order that prohibited the deposition of the plaintiff's minor son. The court held that the minor is a material witness whose deposition cannot
• Matthews v. City OF Maitland
  923 So. 2d 591· Fla. 5th DCA· 2006-03-24 ·cited 1×
  Petitioners challenged trial court orders compelling disclosure of names of contributors to a litigation fund and website opposing a city development project. The court granted certiorari, holding that disclosure was irrelevant to the issues in the case and would chill First Amen
• Rodrigo Troy Prichard v. Galicia
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-03-12
  In a marital dissolution action, the petitioner challenges a civil contempt order imposing a $1,000 daily coercive fine for failure to comply with prior agreed orders regarding financial discovery and temporary support. The Third District Court of Appeal granted certiorari review
• Vital Pharms., Inc. v. Kesten
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2022-08-24
  When an amended rule of appellate procedure confers or expands jurisdiction, the relevant date for determining applicability is the date the appellate proceeding is commenced, not the date the underlying trial court order was entered. Accordingly, the newly amended Rule 9.130(a)(
• Publix Super Mkts., Inc. v. Molina
  Fla. 5th DCA· 2022-04-07
  Publix sought certiorari review of a trial court order sustaining objections to discovery requests directed at Molina's healthcare providers, seeking to uncover potential financial bias and relationships between providers and Molina's law firm. The court dismissed the petition fo
• Ulizio v. Mmmg, LLC
  Fla. 4th DCA· 2022-03-09
• THE Shir LAW Grp., P.A. v. Dario Carnevale
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2020-07-01
  This case involves two consolidated appeals concerning a non-final order granting partial summary judgment and an order denying a motion to disqualify a judge. The appellate court granted partial relief on the summary judgment order, reversing the portion that compelled immediate
• THE Shir LAW Grp., P.A. v. Dario Carnevale, Esq.
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2020-07-01
  This case involves two consolidated appellate petitions concerning a non-final order granting partial summary judgment and an order denying a motion to disqualify a judge. The appellate court granted partial relief on the summary judgment order, reversing the portion that compell
• B.R. v. Dep't of Child. & Families
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2020-05-06
  The appellate court denied a mother's petition for certiorari, upholding a trial court's order for her to undergo a mental health evaluation as part of a dependency case. The court found that the mother's mental health was in controversy due to her admitted need for trauma therap
• McFall v. Welsh
  Fla. 5th DCA· 2019-08-08
  A motion to stay a nonfinal order pending certiorari review is denied without prejudice where the trial court has not yet ruled on a parallel stay motion filed below.
• Newman v. Mayer Brown, LLP
  252 So. 3d 755· Fla. 4th DCA· 2018-07-25
  Assignors who retain substantial financial interests in assigned claims and contractually agree to participate in discovery may be treated as de facto parties for discovery purposes, and need not be served with subpoenas despite being technically nonparties. Florida Rule of Civil
• IN the Interest OF I.N. v. Dep't of Child. & Families Ad Litem Program
  224 So. 3d 900· Fla. 2d DCA· 2017-08-23
  The Florida Second District Court of Appeal quashed a dependency court order granting reunification between a father and his young daughter (I.N.) based on the court's departure from essential legal requirements. The court found that the dependency judge failed to properly apply
• STO Corp. v. Greenhut Constr. Co., Inc.
  146 So. 3d 534· Fla. 1st DCA· 2014-09-16
  STO Corp. petitioned for certiorari review of a discovery sanction order that deemed complaint paragraphs admitted after failing to comply with a production order. The court dismissed the petition, holding that certiorari review of non-final discovery sanctions is available only
• Beau Bowin v. Molyneaux
  100 So. 3d 1197· Fla. 5th DCA· 2012-11-09
  The court held that the petition for certiorari review must be denied without prejudice because the trial court has not completed its judicial labor on the matter.
• Reynolds v. State
  963 So. 2d 908· Fla. 2d DCA· 2007-08-29
  The attorney-client privilege applies to an examination under oath conducted by a liability insurer for the purpose of defending the insured, even if the examination has some adversarial characteristics.