Boys Markets Injunction

71 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Hardline Elec., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers
  680 F.2d 622· 9th Cir.· 1982-06-29 ·cited 6×
  A party seeking an injunction against a strike under Boys Markets must demonstrate the underlying dispute is arbitrable, and cannot then avoid arbitration for damages. An injunction must be narrowly tailored to arbitrable issues.
• Zeigler Coal Co. v. Local Union NO. 1870
  566 F.2d 582· 7th Cir.· 1977-12-01 ·cited 6×
  A sympathy strike in support of sister unions, even if it violates a no-strike clause, is not subject to a Boys Markets injunction pending arbitration of the dispute over the strike's legality.
• Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers OF Am.
  519 F.2d 1155· 3d Cir.· 1975-07-24 ·cited 6×
  The employer is not obligated to withdraw employees from designated areas if the mine committee's recommendations of imminent danger were not made in good faith.
• Gen. Elec. Co. v. Local Union 191
  443 F.2d 608· 5th Cir.· 1971-05-18 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the case is moot because the strike activity has ceased, the wage dispute is resolved, and the contract under which the strike was allegedly a breach is no longer in effect.
• Standard Food Prods. Corp. v. Mortimer Brandenburg and Norman J. Joseph
  436 F.2d 964· 2d Cir.· 1970-12-30 ·cited 6×
  A federal court cannot enjoin a union strike if the collective bargaining agreement expressly allows the union to strike over specific employer violations and the union presents a colorable claim of such violations.
• Elsinore Shore Assocs. v. Local 54
  820 F.2d 62· 3d Cir.· 1987-05-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that a Boys Markets injunction against a strike is improper when the underlying dispute is a non-arbitrable wage negotiation failure, not a contract interpretation issue.
• Ala. By-Products Corp. v. Local NO. 1881
  690 F.2d 831· 11th Cir.· 1982-11-01 ·cited 4×
  Sufficient evidence supports the district court's finding of a union and its officials in civil contempt for a strike that violated a temporary restraining order.
• Latas Libby's, Inc. v. United Steelworkers OF Am.
  609 F.2d 25· 1st Cir.· 1979-11-06 ·cited 4×
  The Union is liable for damages from an illegal strike due to authorizing and/or condoning it, but a broad injunction against all future strikes is reversed as overly broad and not supported by evidence of a pattern of violations.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. State Elec. Serv., Inc.
  477 F.2d 749· 5th Cir.· 1973-04-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the employer's refusal to abide by a contract negotiated by its multi-employer association was a violation of the National Labor Relations Act, as the union's work stoppage did not breach the contract's limited 'no strike' clause.
• ICE Cream Drivers & Emps. Union Local 757 v. Borden, Inc.
  433 F.2d 41· 2d Cir.· 1970-10-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the majority's decision improperly expanded the scope of arbitration beyond what the parties agreed to, potentially allowing for delay and judicial interference in arbitral matters.
• Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. NEW York Shipping Ass'n, Inc.
  965 F.2d 1224· 2d Cir.· 1992-06-01 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to enjoin arbitration when such arbitration would interfere with the court's ability to adjudicate a RICO consent decree. The court affirmed the district court's decision.
• Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. Local 1291, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO
  909 F.2d 754· 3d Cir.· 1990-07-27 ·cited 2×
  A union can only be subject to injunctive relief for a wildcat strike under section 301 of the LMRA if the picketing is attributable to the union through common-law agency principles, requiring proof of instigation, participation, or encouragement.
• Local Union NO. 733 OF the Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers v. Ingalls Shipbuilding Division
  906 F.2d 149· 5th Cir.· 1990-07-18 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the union failed to demonstrate irreparable harm sufficient to warrant a preliminary injunction against the employer's drug testing program pending arbitration, as traditional arbitral remedies could address potential harm.
• S.C. Stevedores Ass'n v. Local NO. 1422
  765 F.2d 422· 4th Cir.· 1985-06-19 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the injunction was improperly granted because the dispute was already resolved by an enforced arbitration award under the master contract, meaning no further arbitration obligation existed under local contract provisions.
• United Parcel Serv. (NEW York), Inc. v. Local 804
  698 F.2d 100· 2d Cir.· 1983-01-06 ·cited 2×
  A Boys Markets injunction requires adherence to Norris-LaGuardia Act sections 8 and 9. Failure to determine if UPS utilized available expedited arbitration and issuing an overbroad prospective injunction warrants vacating the injunction.
• Int'l Detective Serv., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters
  614 F.2d 29· 1st Cir.· 1980-02-06 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the company's appeal was timely and the district court did not exceed its jurisdiction in ordering arbitration of all arbitrable disputes when continuing a Boys Markets injunction.
• Catalytic, Inc. v. Monmouth & Ocean Cnty. Bldg. Trades Council
  829 F.2d 430· 3d Cir.· 1987-09-23
  A union's handbilling at a plant gate, which effectively induces a work stoppage and violates a collective bargaining agreement's no-strike clause, is not protected activity and can be enjoined, even if the union claims the dispute is with a third party.
• United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Kroger Co.
  778 F.2d 1161-1171· 6th Cir.· 1985-12-10
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction to prevent the sale of stores pending arbitration, as the union failed to demonstrate sufficient equitable grounds.