Boys Markets Exception

58 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Sys. Council U-4 v. Fla. Power & Light Co.
  784 F. Supp. 854· S.D. Fla.· 1991-12-16
  A union is not entitled to a preliminary injunction to prevent employer layoffs and reassignments when the employer has broad management rights under the collective bargaining agreement and the potential harm to employees from layoffs and subsequent 'rolling' does not defeat the
• Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc. v. Int'l Union
  910 F.2d 130· 4th Cir.· 1990-08-06
  The court held that the district court erred by not factually finding the cause of the work stoppage and that the work stoppage was not subject to the Boys Markets injunction exception.
• Matson Plastering Co., Inc. v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons Int'l Ass'n, AFL-CIO
  633 F.2d 1307· 9th Cir.· 1980-12-12
  The district court lacked jurisdiction to issue a preliminary injunction against a strike when the underlying dispute concerns the interpretation of a no-strike clause, as per Buffalo Forge.
• Design & Mfg. Corp. v. Int'l Union
  608 F.2d 767· 7th Cir.· 1979-12-17
  A federal court cannot enjoin a sympathy strike when the sole dispute is whether the strike violates a no-strike clause, even if that violation is subject to arbitration.
• Eaton Corp. v. Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers
  580 F.2d 254· 7th Cir.· 1978-07-26
  The court held that the district court properly granted a preliminary injunction under the Boys Markets exception to the Norris-LaGuardia Act, as the collective bargaining agreement bound both parties to arbitrate and contained a no-strike clause violated by the Union's strike.
• Local 391 v. Hiram H. Ward
  501 F.2d 456· 4th Cir.· 1974-05-21
  The court held that the district court must hear and decide the unions' motions to dissolve the injunction before adjudicating the contempt motion.