Boundary By Acquiescence

61 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Evers v. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs.
  651 So. 2d 802· Fla. 1st DCA· 1995-03-09
  The court reversed the trial court's order enforcing a final judgment of dissolution that made the wife responsible for certain debts previously discharged in bankruptcy, finding the debts were indeed discharged.
• Wadsworth v. Barney L. Myers and Myrtice Myers
  585 So. 2d 409· Fla. 2d DCA· 1991-08-28
  This case involves a boundary line dispute between neighbors, the Wadsworths and the Myerses. The trial court ruled in favor of the Myerses, establishing the boundary based on an older survey and the parties' long-standing acquiescence. The appellate court affirmed, finding the c
• Archer v. Levy
  543 So. 2d 863· Fla. 3d DCA· 1989-05-23
  The Archers appealed a trial court judgment that required them to deed a six-foot strip of their property to the Levys to allow the Levys to maintain a tennis court that had encroached on the Archers' lot since before they acquired title. The appellate court reversed, holding tha
• Tatra, Inc. v. Spencer
  409 So. 2d 1172· Fla. 3d DCA· 1982-02-16
  The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence to support adverse possession or boundary by acquiescence.
• Boise Cascade Corp. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
  630 F.2d 720· 10th Cir.· 1980-07-24
  A railroad's right-of-way under the 1875 Act is perfected by actual construction, not solely by filing a profile map, and this right takes precedence over subsequent state land grants.
• Edward v. Pikulski
  347 So. 2d 723· Fla. 2d DCA· 1977-06-15
• Fla. Salt Springs Corp. v. H. A. P. Leininger and his wife
  337 So. 2d 399· Fla. 1st DCA· 1976-09-13
  Florida Salt Springs Corporation appealed an ejectment judgment in favor of the Leiningers. The court reversed and remanded because the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict on boundary by acquiescence and in instructing the jury on that doctrine, as the parties did n
• French v. Youmans
  282 So. 2d 642· Fla. 2d DCA· 1973-09-14
  The court held that the trial judge's finding of fact that the new, straighter Billy's Creek has been acquiesced in as the boundary of lots fronting on Billy's Creek is legally sustained.
• Walters v. Long
  237 So. 2d 573· Fla. 1st DCA· 1970-07-07
  In this property boundary dispute, the Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's judgment finding that plaintiffs own a disputed 33-by-235 foot strip of land between adjoining parcels. The court rejected defendants' argument that a fence line had become the agreed
• Stoutamire v. Parramore
  29 Fla. Supp. 177· Leon Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1965-08-02
  This Leon County Circuit Court case resolved a boundary dispute between the Stoutamires and Parramores over a strip of land in Section 15. The court determined that the plaintiffs held superior title to most of the disputed strip based on color of title and adverse possession, bu