-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-29
The court held that plaintiffs have standing for claims related to generators they purchased, but lacks personal jurisdiction over Generac Holdings and claims by non-Florida plaintiffs.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-19
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to allege facts demonstrating a concrete injury, thus lacking Article III standing to pursue their claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-19
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because they failed to allege a concrete economic injury for damages or an imminent threat of future harm for injunctive relief, and thus the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-10
This is a proposed class action alleging that Upfield US, Inc. misleadingly labeled its Country Crock Plant Butter products by prominently featuring 'made with olive oil' or 'with olive oil' on the front label when olive oil comprises only a minimal amount of the oil blend. Plain
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-27
The court held that the plaintiff failed to adequately plead Article III standing, lacking subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-24
The court held that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing to pursue claims for both monetary damages and injunctive relief because he failed to allege a concrete and particularized injury-in-fact, particularly in light of the defendant's money-back guarantee and the speculati
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-12-29
A dispute arose between AECOM and its subcontractor PSI regarding whether PSI's contract incorporated an RFP requirement to perform pilot hole borings at every drilled shaft location for a Tampa expressway construction project. The court determined that PSI's contract incorporate
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-11-01
The court held that Plaintiff has standing, adequately identified defendants, and stated a claim under the Funeral Act, but dismissed FDUTPA claims due to statutory exclusions.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2021-05-26
An insurer's subrogation rights are limited to recovery of amounts exceeding the greater of two different measures of damages (replacement cost and fair market value), and replacement cost insurance proceeds cannot be set off against tort damages measured by fair market value whe
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2021-02-17
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2021-01-21
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims, holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing. The court found that the alleged "imminent risk of future harm" from the data breach was not concrete, particularized, actual, or imminent, and that th
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2020-04-22
The Court held that the July 2017 email constituted the "Principal Statement" under the promissory note, establishing the principal amount as $6,000,000. The Court found that the note's language unambiguously defined a Principal Statement as any statement setting forth the calcul
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-01-28
Plaintiffs who purchased allegedly unregistered tires from National Tire and Battery sought damages under various state and federal laws, claiming the defendant's failure to comply with federal tire registration requirements under 49 C.F.R. § 574.8 deprived them of the benefit of
-
Del.·
2019-05-02
The Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery's decision, holding that Invenergy breached the LLC Agreement by conducting a Material Partial Sale without Leaf's consent or paying the Target Multiple. The Court found that Section 8.04 unambiguously required Invenergy t
-
992 So. 2d 388·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2008-10-10
Ronald Wayne Gilley, Jr., appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that his counsel was ineffective and that he should have received a lighter sentence due to the State's failure to immediately transfer his probation to Maryland. The appell
-
Del.·
2001-03-09
The Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court's dismissal of the breach of contract claim, holding that the state contract statute of limitations, not the federal securities statute of limitations, applies. The Court also affirmed the dismissal of the unjust enrichment c
-
Del.·
2000-11-17
The Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's judgment, holding that the additional estoppel remedy sought by Genencor for the 2.2(a) product was not appropriate. The Court found that the representation and warranty in the license agreement was intended to define Genencor's affirmat
-
767 So. 2d 483·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-05-17
Betty Cameron sought damages for breach of contract after failing to receive stock promised as a finder's fee for securing an investor for Focus Financial. The trial court awarded her only half the value of the stock ($54,000 instead of $108,000) based on alleged deception. The a
-
587 So. 2d 623·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1991-10-14
In this commercial dispute, McEnally sold a water utility system to Pioneer Woodlawn Utilities (Myers) with a lien to Bay County securing McEnally's unpaid water bills. When regulatory approval of a pass-through rate increase failed, the deal collapsed and the county foreclosed.
-
924 F.2d 709·
7th Cir.·
1991-02-08
The court held that avoided expenses from a buyer's upgrade option may be factored into lost profits damages, and the nature of a research grant must be determined to assess its credit value.
-
513 So. 2d 204·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1987-09-16
Appellant challenged his conviction entered pursuant to a plea agreement where the state agreed to recommend a one-year jail sentence with probation and counseling. The state violated the plea bargain by failing to make its promised recommendation at sentencing, and the trial cou
-
794 F.2d 61·
2d Cir.·
1986-06-26
The court held that the usury defense was unavailable to Bunge and that his fraud counterclaim failed due to lack of proven damages.
-
666 F.2d 1213·
8th Cir.·
1981-12-17
The court held that lost profits and overhead should be added to the damages awarded on the complaint, modifying the trial court's judgment.