543 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 562 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
491 F.2d 31·
D.C. Cir.·
1974-01-08
·cited 8×
The Secretary's standard for permanent labeling of retreaded tires was not sufficiently supported by evidence of its practicability and economic feasibility.
-
The court held that the denial of a security clearance was supported by substantial evidence, including findings that the applicant's homosexuality posed a threat of disclosure of classified information due to potential coercion.
-
The Florida Supreme Court upheld the validation of $7 billion in state bonds to finance a Volusia County Bridge project, rejecting appellants' objections as falling outside judicial review and lacking legal merit.
-
453 F.2d 1·
2d Cir.·
1971-12-16
·cited 8×
-
The court held that a probationary public employee's interest in continued employment is conditional and does not require a pre-termination hearing to satisfy due process, especially when balanced against the state's interest in efficient administration.
-
The court held that the fifteen-cent location differential in the St. Louis Milk Marketing Order was statutorily permissible and constitutionally valid.
-
447 F.2d 876·
4th Cir.·
1971-08-20
·cited 8×
The court affirmed the FCC's ruling that licensees broadcasting anti-smoking messages are not required by the fairness doctrine to grant time for opposing views, as the health hazards of smoking are no longer considered a controversial issue.
-
St. Joe Paper Company appealed a judgment denying agricultural zoning for a 500-acre parcel of its timberland in St. Johns County, Florida. The court upheld the County Agricultural Zoning Board's determination that the land was not being used in a bona fide forestry operation as
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the IRS applied an improper standard or acted arbitrarily in denying his promotion in absentia, and thus the Board of Appeals and Review's decision denying back pay was correct.
-
422 F.2d 504·
8th Cir.·
1970-02-25
·cited 8×
The court held that the Federal Home Loan Bank Board acted within its statutory authority in authorizing mobile savings and loan facilities and that the plaintiffs failed to state a proper claim for antitrust violations.
-
The court held that the removal notices substantially complied with regulations and that the plaintiff failed to establish claims of reprisal, discrimination, or arbitrary action, thus denying his motions and dismissing the petition.
-
A regulatory board's determination of executive salary allowances and rate of return must be based on competent substantial evidence, not mere familiarity or opinion.
-
378 F.2d 109·
10th Cir.·
1967-05-24
·cited 8×
The court held that the Administrative Procedure Act does not grant jurisdiction to review the Secretary of the Interior's determination of heirship to a restricted Indian estate, as such decisions are statutorily made final.
-
336 F.2d 641·
6th Cir.·
1964-09-30
·cited 8×
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's rule requiring immediate service of election protests was a reasonable procedural rule that the Board was authorized to adopt.
-
294 F.2d 735·
D.C. Cir.·
1961-07-20
·cited 8×
The court held that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a continuance for discovery, as the appellants' request was untimely and lacked sufficient factual basis.
-
A local court of general jurisdiction has the authority to conduct a trial de novo to review administrative action when no specific statutory provision for judicial review exists, and such a trial de novo can satisfy due process requirements.
-
284 F.2d 687·
Ct. Cl.·
1960-03-02
·cited 8×
The court held that the agency's separation of the plaintiff followed proper procedures and was not arbitrary, and that the Civil Service Commission and the President's Committee on Government Employment Policy also acted without procedural error or arbitrariness.
-
The dissenting judge believes the plaintiff should have an opportunity to prove his claims of arbitrary dismissal from college, and that the case should be remanded for trial.
-
Property owners challenged special assessments levied by the City of North Miami for street improvements, including widening, repaving, and lighting installation. The Florida Supreme Court upheld the assessments as substantially valid but reversed in part, holding that costs for
-
216 F.2d 258·
9th Cir.·
1954-10-04
·cited 8×
The court held that the Selective Service Boards' refusal to grant the defendant exemption as a minister was without basis in fact and arbitrary, requiring reversal.
-
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board was justified in finding that the apartment hotel operation and maintenance employees, along with other company employees, constituted an appropriate bargaining unit.
-
200 F.2d 385·
7th Cir.·
1952-12-09
·cited 8×
The court held that the draft board did not abuse its discretion in refusing to reopen the defendant's classification, as the facts presented did not meet the statutory requirements for exemption as a full-time student preparing for the ministry.
-
151 F.2d 155·
3d Cir.·
1945-09-18
·cited 8×
A court cannot substitute its judgment for that of Selective Service Boards unless there is a clear showing of fraud, caprice, lack of power, or lack of due process.
-
144 F.2d 539·
D.C. Cir.·
1944-07-24
·cited 8×
The majority held that the Labor Act does not authorize judicial review of the Board's certification if it has not been followed by an order.
-
The court held that the public utility district's taking of properties was a public necessity and that the trial court did not err in its rulings on evidence or jury instructions regarding just compensation.
-
J.D. appeals her adjudication of delinquency for marijuana possession found after a school official questioned her based on a Crime Watch tip. The Fourth District Court of Appeal held that school officials need not meet the constitutional standard of reasonable suspicion to detai
-
762 So. 2d 982·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2000-06-07
·cited 7×
Quevedo appeals the South Florida Water Management District's revocation of his permit to erect a fence on the District's canal right-of-way behind his property. The court affirms the revocation, holding that the fence's obstruction of public access to the right-of-way was incons
-
32 F. Supp. 2d 1337·
S.D. Fla.·
1998-12-09
·cited 7×
The court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding it had subject matter jurisdiction and that plaintiffs had not failed to exhaust administrative remedies, and that their claims under the INA, APA, FOIA, and Due Process Clause were cognizable.
-
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal district courts from reviewing claims that are inextricably intertwined with state court judgments, but it does not bar claims brought by individuals who were not parties to the state proceedings.
-
603 So. 2d 1299·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1992-08-03
·cited 7×
The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed an administrative order awarding a competitively bid lease to Lima Development Corporation because HRS improperly delegated its statutory responsibility to evaluate and select bids to the hearing officer, even though the parties stipu
-
596 So. 2d 759·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1992-04-02
·cited 7×
This case concerns the proper procedure for evaluating competitive bids for a government lease. The court held that an administrative hearing officer exceeded their authority by conducting a de novo review of bids when the issue was a disputed award, rather than a rejection of al
-
584 So. 2d 39·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1991-07-05
·cited 7×
Martin Memorial Hospital Association sought judicial review of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' rejection of its letter of intent for a certificate of need application based on using the phrase "within the cost guidelines" instead of the mandated "at or below
-
857 F.2d 793·
D.C. Cir.·
1988-06-30
·cited 7×
The court denied rehearing en banc, affirming the panel's decision to award fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
-
486 So. 2d 1341·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1986-03-31
·cited 7×
The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) denied appellants' Certificate of Need (CON) application for a 100-bed psychiatric hospital based on a mathematical bed-need formula, finding no projected need. The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding
-
The court held that while the district court had jurisdiction to review the BIA's arbitrary action in refusing to recognize a tribal council, it lacked jurisdiction to resolve the underlying intratribal election dispute.
-
570 F.2d 693·
8th Cir.·
1978-01-25
·cited 7×
The court held that the Federal Home Loan Bank Board had the statutory authority to grant a branch application, and that the district court correctly disposed of all issues, including those raised by an amended complaint.
-
376 F.2d 161·
10th Cir.·
1967-03-09
·cited 7×
The court denied petitions for rehearing, clarifying factual errors in its prior opinion regarding Louisiana's tax structure and the Federal Power Commission's tax reimbursement determinations.
-
The court held that the preliminary injunction was properly issued because the allegations presented grave questions regarding the ordinance's arbitrary enforcement and potential violation of constitutional rights, and the injury to appellees would be irreparable if denied.
-
The court held that a registrant cannot challenge his Selective Service classification via habeas corpus before reporting for induction, as established in Falbo v. United States.
-
946 So. 2d 48·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2006-12-15
·cited 6×
An applicant for professional engineer licensure sought mandamus relief against the Board of Professional Engineers for failing to grant or deny his petition for formal hearing within the statutory 15-day period. The court granted the petition, awarded attorney's fees, and held t
-
672 So. 2d 878·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1996-05-01
·cited 6×
The Marine Industries Association challenged the constitutionality of Florida's Manatee Sanctuary Act and a Department of Environmental Protection rule establishing slow-speed boating zones in Broward County intracoastal waters. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the st
-
656 So. 2d 940·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1995-05-17
·cited 6×
D.A.B. Constructors sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Florida Department of Transportation to reject White Construction's bid as nonresponsible and award the contract to D.A.B. The court held that contractor responsibility determinations based on delinquency must be resolve
-
988 F.2d 146·
D.C. Cir.·
1993-03-16
·cited 6×
The court held that the NRC's denial of exemptions for UF6 converters based on pass-through inability and its intra-class allocation of low-level radioactive waste disposal costs were not adequately reasoned, requiring remand. However, the court affirmed the general fee allocatio
-
The court held that the Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying a waiver of deportation, as its decision was rational and based on the petitioner's significant criminal history.
-
966 F.2d 1292·
9th Cir.·
1992-06-04
·cited 6×
The court held that EPA's definition of 'discharge associated with industrial activity' was a permissible construction of the statute, and that NRDC's claims regarding permit deadlines and substantive controls were premature.
-
The court held that the EPA's denial of Citizens' petitions for administrative review was not arbitrary or capricious, as Citizens failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that recycling should be considered a Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for the Spokane i
-
The court held that the Secretary of the Interior has the authority to order a lessee to provide records for an audit, even if those records pertain to a period outside the general statute of limitations for collecting royalties.
-
The court held that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the appellants' applications for permanent resident status, as their prolonged absence from the United States as minors imputed abandonment of residence from th
-
The court held that the petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving Goltra had actual or constructive knowledge of a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by face shields.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in denying discovery concerning the government's civil forfeiture policies, and therefore affirmed the grant of summary judgment.