-
451 F.2d 1344·
4th Cir.·
1971-11-30
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal, holding that federal courts should not enjoin state criminal proceedings under the Younger abstention doctrine unless specific criteria for irreparable harm or patent unconstitutionality are met.
-
443 F.2d 404·
4th Cir.·
1971-06-15
The court held that the district court erred in enjoining state court proceedings and refusing to dissolve the injunction, as it was not necessary in aid of the federal court's jurisdiction.
-
444 F.2d 778·
9th Cir.·
1971-05-13
A federal court cannot enjoin a state court action to protect a prior federal decree when the prior decree did not actually litigate or decide the substantive issues now raised in state court.
-
411 F.2d 653·
7th Cir.·
1969-06-05
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying injunctive relief to stay state court proceedings.
-
376 F.2d 815·
6th Cir.·
1967-04-25
The federal court should not exercise jurisdiction to enjoin a state court criminal prosecution when the plaintiff has an adequate remedy under state law and no substantial federal question is presented.
-
353 F.2d 206·
7th Cir.·
1965-11-08
The court held that Kamsler's suit for a temporary injunction to restrain further prosecution under indictments was properly dismissed because there was no further prosecution to restrain.
-
333 F.2d 367·
2d Cir.·
1964-06-23
The court held that federal courts are prohibited by 28 U.S.C. § 2283 from enjoining state court proceedings in this case. Federal courts must trust state courts to protect federal rights.
-
218 F.2d 664·
6th Cir.·
1955-03-01
The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint seeking to enjoin a state court action, as federal law does not preclude state court jurisdiction over common law tort claims arising from union conduct.