Amount In Controversy

1,259 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 81 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Rneg Corp. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-12-16
  The court held that Atzmi's claims against ReneG were insufficient to establish a valid claim to the interpleaded funds, thus he was not a properly interplead party.
• Pagliara v. Dungan
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-16
  The court held that the plaintiff's conversion of the case to a derivative action destroyed complete diversity, divesting the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
• Keiri Patricia Castillo Nunez v. Target Corp.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-11
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving federal diversity jurisdiction, and therefore, the case must be remanded to state court.
• Miller v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-10
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional minimum for removal.
• Keiri Patricia Castillo Nunez v. Target Corp.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-09
  The court held that the defendant's notice of removal was insufficient to establish federal diversity jurisdiction because the amount in controversy was not adequately demonstrated.
• Southwind Risk Retention Grp. v. Sod of Cent. Fla., Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-05
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for default judgment because the plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to establish subject matter jurisdiction, specifically regarding the amount in controversy.
• Caine v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. & Progressive Select Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-12-03
  The court held that the removing defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold for diversity jurisdiction.
• Blue Sky Prop. Dev. & Mgmt., LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-26
  The court granted the motion to remand because the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving complete diversity of citizenship.
• Henry v. Blazin Wings, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-21
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional threshold, requiring remand to state court.
• Rosetta J. Walker v. Fid. Ins. Agency, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-21
  The court held that the defendant insurance agent was a citizen of Utah, not Florida, thus establishing complete diversity and denying the plaintiff's motion to remand.
• Youngblood v. Total Renal Care, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-17
  The court held that the defendant failed to sufficiently demonstrate the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction.
• Asuzene Grady v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-14
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold, requiring remand.
• AJ Brown v. Wagner
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-14
  The district court dismissed plaintiff AJ Brown's diversity action against multiple defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that Brown and at least two defendants were citizens of the same state (Florida), thus failing to satisfy the complete diversity require
• Zimmerman v. Forkins
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-13
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish diversity jurisdiction, thus the case must be remanded to state court.
• Williams v. Walmart Stores E., LP
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-06
  A defendant seeking removal based on diversity jurisdiction must establish the amount in controversy by a preponderance of the evidence, and mere allegations or speculative damages are insufficient.
• Mellen v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-11-05
  The court denied the defendant's motion for reconsideration because the court lacks jurisdiction to review its own remand order based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and even if it had jurisdiction, the defendant's arguments for excusable neglect were unavailing.
• Travise Johnson v. Doe
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-31
  The court held that the defendant failed to sufficiently establish the amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction based on the provided evidence.
• Cadence Equip. Fin. v. Victoria Edward Spa & Wellness Ctr., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-31
  The court denied the motion for default judgment because the plaintiff failed to establish the court's jurisdiction over the parties and claims.
• Tomanek v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-30
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish the amount in controversy by a preponderance of the evidence, requiring remand to state court.
• Dow v. Sunrun, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-30
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction, thus the case must be remanded to state court. The court denied the plaintiff's request for attorney's fees because the defendant had an objectively reasonable
• Felecia R. Lowe v. Tax Def. Network, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-30
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to properly allege diversity jurisdiction, but granted one final opportunity to do so.
• McCoy v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-30
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving diversity jurisdiction because the amount in controversy was not plausibly established.
• Jerrod McCoy v. Crown Equip. Corp.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-29
  The court held that the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction was met, despite plaintiff's arguments regarding collateral source payments.
• Mellen v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-29
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional threshold for diversity jurisdiction.
• Timeshares Direct, Inc. v. Watstein Terepka, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-10-23
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, as the defendant's own attorney's fees incurred in litigating the fee dispute could not be counted towards the amount in controversy from the plaintiff's perspective. Therefore,
• Tomanek v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-20
  The court held that the defendant's Notice of Removal was insufficient to establish federal subject-matter jurisdiction.
• Libert v. Fed. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-17
  The court held that the defendant's notice of removal was timely because the thirty-day clock did not begin until the defendant received an amended pleading or other paper from which removability could be ascertained, which was after the initial complaint.
• Rodriguez v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-14
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the $75,000 jurisdictional minimum, thus the case must be remanded to state court.
• Asuzene Grady v. Bj's Wholesale Club, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-07
  The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to adequately allege diversity jurisdiction due to insufficient pleading of party citizenship and amount in controversy.
• Knowles v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-01
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet its burden to establish the amount in controversy for removal, and therefore, the case must be remanded to state court.
• Bauman v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-10-01 ·via Amount In Controversy Requirement
  The removing defendant failed to meet its burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 at the time of removal. Vague allegations of permanent injury coupled with unsupported pre-suit demand information constitute mere specul
• Machin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-10-01 ·via Amount In Controversy Requirement
  The court held that the plaintiff's motion to remand is granted because the amount in controversy does not meet the federal subject matter jurisdiction threshold.
• Williams v. Walmart Stores E., LP
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-23
  The court held that the defendant's notice of removal was insufficient to establish federal diversity jurisdiction because the amount in controversy was not proven to exceed $75,000.
• McCoy v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-22
  The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to adequately allege diversity jurisdiction due to defective allegations regarding party citizenship and amount in controversy.
• Kureti v. Coast Prof'l, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-19
  The court held that a private debt collector cannot violate due process rights and that diversity jurisdiction was not properly established due to lack of complete diversity. The court also found a forum selection clause in loan documents to be enforceable, requiring dismissal of
• Henry v. Blazin Wings, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-17
  The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to adequately allege diversity jurisdiction due to insufficient allegations regarding the citizenship of the parties.
• Sunnydell Plaza, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-16
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish subject-matter jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence and ordered the defendant to supplement the notice of removal.
• Brewster v. Sam's E., Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-16
  The court held that the removing defendant failed to establish diversity jurisdiction because the citizenship of the LLC's members was not provided.
• Mengel v. Rey
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-04
  The court held that the defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing federal subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity.
• Taillard v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-09-03
  The court held that the plaintiff sufficiently stated claims for breach of express warranty and negligent repair, but not for revocation of acceptance due to lack of privity.
• Luzinski v. Coverys Specialty Ins. Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-09-02
  The court held that the defendant's notice of removal was untimely because the initial pleading did not establish federal jurisdiction and subsequent documents did not unambiguously establish removability within the statutory time limits.
• Brittell v. Cbre, Inc.
  2023 WL 11841026· M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-29
  The court held that the defendants failed to meet their burden of proving the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, requiring remand to state court.
• eFraud Servs., Inc. v. SGS Ventures LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-29
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to properly allege federal subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity.
• Smihula v. Navy Fed. Credit Union
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-27
  The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claims because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000 and no federal law is implicated.
• Neiman v. AllState Ins. Co.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-08-26
  The court recommended remanding the case because the notice of removal failed to properly allege diversity of citizenship, and the defendant did not cure these deficiencies.
• DNA Comprehensive Therapy Servs., LLC. v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-20
  The court dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction due to insufficient allegations of the plaintiff LLC's citizenship.
• Engels v. Gantlett
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-15
  The defendant failed to meet her burden of establishing federal subject-matter jurisdiction, requiring her to supplement the notice of removal.
• David v. Wawa, Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-14
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional threshold for diversity jurisdiction.
• Meyers v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-08-13
  The court held that the plaintiffs' jurisdictional allegations were defective and did not sufficiently establish diversity jurisdiction.
• Andreu v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-08-08
  The court held that the defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the $75,000 threshold for diversity jurisdiction.