Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count

• United States v. Bradley
  447 F.2d 657· 3d Cir.· 1971-08-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict the appellant as an aider and abettor and that any error in jury instructions regarding constructive possession was harmless.
• United States v. Sangster
  442 F.2d 1289· 7th Cir.· 1971-05-25 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt for conspiracy and bank robbery, and that asserted procedural errors were without merit.
• United States v. Bray
  442 F.2d 1064· 9th Cir.· 1971-05-17 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the pre-arrest delay did not violate due process and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
• United States v. Enoch Stanley Harvey
  439 F.2d 142· 3d Cir.· 1971-03-12 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the jury charge was clear and accurate, and the exclusion of identification witnesses was within the district court's discretion.
• Gagnon v. State
  243 So. 2d 219· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-01-19 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the defendant's numerous grounds for appeal, including issues with counsel, speedy trial, identification, jury selection, lesser included offenses, prosecutorial comment, confrontation rights, and charge reduction, did not constitute reversible error.
• Zizzo v. United States
  431 F.2d 913· 7th Cir.· 1970-09-09 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the Marchetti and Grosso decisions, which established that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination can be asserted as a defense to prosecution for failure to pay federal wagering taxes, should be applied retroactively to cases involving gambli
• Cascio v. United States
  429 F.2d 581· 9th Cir.· 1970-06-22 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary guilty plea were insufficient to warrant vacating his sentence.
• United States v. Fueston
  426 F.2d 785· 9th Cir.· 1970-04-30 ·cited 8×
  The court held that while the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction, an unconstitutional presumption instruction required a new trial.
• United States v. Rody Charles Grey
  422 F.2d 1043· 6th Cir.· 1970-02-24 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed Williams' conviction but vacated Grey's conviction and remanded for a new trial due to prosecutorial misconduct.
• United States v. Johnson
  421 F.2d 1342· 9th Cir.· 1970-02-02 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the appellant's contentions were frivolous and denied his motion for new counsel and to restart the appeal.
• United States v. Gould
  419 F.2d 825· 9th Cir.· 1969-11-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that importation by a government informant does not absolve participants in the offense, and aiding and abetting smuggling is punishable as a principal offense.
• United States v. Arden Renee Cale
  418 F.2d 897· 6th Cir.· 1969-11-25 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the admission of the husband's pretrial statement did not deny the appellant effective assistance of counsel or the right to cross-examination, and any error was harmless.
• United States v. Matthews
  419 F.2d 1177· D.C. Cir.· 1969-11-10 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the D.C. anti-riot statute is not unconstitutionally vague and that a person can be found to have "engaged in" a riot by looting property known to be stolen during the disturbance, thereby aiding and abetting the riot.
• Hawkins v. United States
  417 F.2d 1271· 5th Cir.· 1969-10-22 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and that no reversible error occurred during the trial regarding witness testimony or prosecutorial remarks.
• Roby v. State
  229 So. 2d 604· Fla. 2d DCA· 1969-10-15 ·cited 8×
  Arthur Lee Roby was convicted of second-degree murder for a shooting death at a Tampa lounge where three defendants fired multiple shots. The appellate court reversed the conviction, finding insufficient evidence that Roby's shots actually caused the victim's death, and noting th
• Perrone v. United States
  416 F.2d 464· 2d Cir.· 1969-10-08 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a defendant is not entitled to a new trial based on counsel's inexperience or improper appointment if the representation was adequate and the trial fair.
• Lannom v. United States
  401 F.2d 504· 9th Cir.· 1968-10-01 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in refusing to give an instruction that the failure of the prosecution to call available witnesses created a presumption against the government, nor in refusing an instruction that a defendant could not be convicted on the uncorrobo
• Howard v. United States
  397 F.2d 72· 9th Cir.· 1968-06-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the appellants' convictions are affirmed because they failed to assert the privilege against self-incrimination at trial, and the aiding and abetting charges are not barred by a co-defendant's privilege.
• Miller v. United States
  392 F.2d 790· 10th Cir.· 1968-03-12 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Carl Miller's conviction for aiding and abetting his brother in passing counterfeit bills or for passing counterfeit bills himself.
• Welton L. Swinney v. United States
  391 F.2d 190· 5th Cir.· 1968-03-07 ·cited 8×
  The court held that money order forms found in an automobile were admissible evidence, even if the initial stop of the vehicle was questionable, because the search was incident to lawful arrests for offenses committed in the officer's presence or the evidence was in plain view.
• Lewis v. United States
  382 F.2d 232· 8th Cir.· 1967-08-29 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence or in its procedural rulings.
• Gonzalez-Alonso v. United States
  379 F.2d 347· 9th Cir.· 1967-06-07 ·cited 8×
  The court held that marijuana seized from a vehicle was admissible as a border search, and that sufficient evidence existed to support the jury's finding of conspiracy and appellants' participation.
• Pino v. United States
  370 F.2d 247· D.C. Cir.· 1966-12-02 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient to confer jurisdiction and that the trial court did not err in its handling of the indictment.
• United States v. Murray B. Baker and Victor O. Gates
  364 F.2d 107· 3d Cir.· 1966-07-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the lottery tickets printed by appellants were sufficiently similar to 'numbers, policy, or similar games' to fall under the federal statute prohibiting interstate transportation of such materials, and that the evidence seized was admissible.
• Rane Gilbert Espinoza v. State
  183 So. 2d 560· Fla. 3d DCA· 1966-03-01 ·cited 8×
  Rane Gilbert Espinoza, a passenger in a car that struck and killed a bicyclist, was convicted as an aider and abettor under Florida's hit-and-run statute. The court reversed, holding that the State failed to prove the essential element of Espinoza's knowledge that an accident cau
• Darrel Paul Giraud v. United States
  348 F.2d 820· 9th Cir.· 1965-07-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that an indictment charging a defendant as a principal is sufficient to support a conviction for aiding and abetting, even if aiding and abetting is not explicitly pleaded. However, convictions for taking mail from the post office require proof that the mail was in
• Pugliese v. United States
  343 F.2d 837· 1st Cir.· 1965-04-13 ·cited 8×
• Pabst v. State
  169 So. 2d 329· Fla. 3d DCA· 1964-12-08 ·cited 8×
  Louis Edward Pabst was convicted of auto larceny after removing an identification plate from a wrecked car with a co-defendant, which was later used on a stolen vehicle. The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction, holding that Pabst's participation in removing t
• Fraker v. United States
  294 F.2d 859· 9th Cir.· 1961-09-29 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, the search was reasonable, and the statements were admissible. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
• United States v. Sahadi
  292 F.2d 565· 2d Cir.· 1961-06-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for passing illegally issued money orders, and that the procedural issues raised were without merit.
• United States v. Melquiades de Jesus
  289 F.2d 37· 2d Cir.· 1961-04-13 ·cited 8×
  The court held that transportation of lottery tickets between Puerto Rico and New York constitutes interstate commerce under federal law, and that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of conspiracy and substantive offenses related to lottery ticket trafficking.
• United States v. Schine
  260 F.2d 552· 2d Cir.· 1958-10-20 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the defendants willfully violated the consent decree by failing to divest themselves of certain theaters and by continuing prohibited practices, and that the contempt convictions were justified.
• Cathcart v. United States
  244 F.2d 74· 10th Cir.· 1957-04-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the information sufficiently alleged a cognizable offense under the statute and was not duplicitous.
• Ira Coleman Roberts v. The United States
  226 F.2d 464· 6th Cir.· 1955-10-25 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the statute prohibiting interstate wire fraud is constitutional and sufficiently specific, and that the indictment and evidence supported the conviction.
• United States v. Titus
  221 F.2d 571· 2d Cir.· 1955-04-26 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court committed no reversible error.
• United States v. Trumblay
  208 F.2d 147· 7th Cir.· 1953-12-02 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict and that no reversible error occurred during the trial.
• Dawes v. Gough
  170 F.2d 396· 5th Cir.· 1948-11-04 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a habeas corpus writ should issue because the indictment count under which the petitioner was sentenced charged no crime.
• Carolene Prods. Co. v. United States
  140 F.2d 61· 4th Cir.· 1944-01-10 ·cited 8×
  The court held that corporate officers can be held criminally liable for corporate violations of the Filled Milk Act, even without personal knowledge of specific shipments, if they are directing heads of the company and the acts fall within the scope of their employment. The cour
• Will Brown and Virgil Croft v. State
  80 Fla. 741· Fla.· 1920-11-29 ·cited 8×
  Two men were convicted of breaking and entering a store and aiding and abetting that crime. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the convictions, rejecting challenges to the denial of a bill of particulars motion, admission of prior conviction evidence on cross-examination, and the
• Dengrong Zhou v. Long Deng and Mark Fang
  2022 WL 1024809· Del. Ch.· 2022-05-16 ·cited 7×
  The Court of Chancery denied Defendants' motion for a stay pending appeal and motion to extend the status quo order. The court found that the Defendants failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, that granting the stay would cause substantial harm to the Plaintiff and the company, a
• R.E. v. State
  13 So. 3d 97· Fla. 4th DCA· 2009-05-20 ·cited 7×
  R.E., a juvenile, was convicted as an aider and abettor to felony criminal mischief after a fruit loader was driven into trees at a grove during an unauthorized hunting expedition. The appellate court reversed the conviction, finding insufficient evidence that R.E. possessed the
• Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co.
  256 F. Supp. 2d 1345· S.D. Fla.· 2003-03-28 ·cited 7×
  The court granted in part the motion to dismiss, finding subject matter jurisdiction lacking for ATCA claims against Coca-Cola U.S.A. and Coca-Cola Colombia due to the Bottler's Agreement, but found jurisdiction intertwined with the merits for other defendants.
• Arwood v. Dunn (In Re Caribbean K Line
  288 B.R. 908· S.D. Fla.· 2002-12-26 ·cited 7×
  The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's determination that the trustee had standing and that personal benefit was not required for liability, but remanded issues regarding prejudgment interest and reversed the dismissal of the civil theft claim.
• Dwyer v. State
  743 So. 2d 46· Fla. 5th DCA· 1999-08-20 ·cited 7×
  Charles Owen Dwyer appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence of the victim's violent reputation. The appellate court vacates and remands, finding that the trial court erroneously rejected t
• United States v. Brechtel
  997 F.2d 1108· 5th Cir.· 1993-08-02 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support Gattuso's convictions on counts two and four, as a rational jury could not find intent to defraud beyond a reasonable doubt based on the presented evidence.
• Elec. Lab. Supply Co., Inc. v. Cullen
  977 F.2d 798· 3d Cir.· 1992-10-15 ·cited 7×
  Attorneys are not 'applicants' under 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(ll) and cannot be sued for wrongful seizure under that provision, nor is there aiding and abetting liability under the statute.
• United States v. An Chyi LIU
  960 F.2d 449· 5th Cir.· 1992-04-30 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the district court did not err in excluding testimony regarding the specific reasons for the defendant's fear, nor in refusing to give a jury instruction on duress, and that the defendant was not entrapped or improperly classified as a manager for sentencing p
• United States v. Hartmann
  958 F.2d 774· 7th Cir.· 1992-03-19 ·cited 7×
  The court affirmed the convictions and sentences, finding no merit in the defendants' challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, evidentiary rulings, or prosecutorial misconduct.
• United States v. Somers
  950 F.2d 1279· 7th Cir.· 1991-12-12 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the defendant's convictions were not barred by double jeopardy, the indictments were not facially insufficient, and the evidence seized was admissible.
• United States v. McCLAIN
  934 F.2d 822· 7th Cir.· 1991-05-28 ·cited 7×
  The court's discussion of the Hobbs Act was advisory and not necessary for the disposition of the appeal.