Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count

• United States v. Contris
  592 F.2d 893· 5th Cir.· 1979-04-09 ·cited 24×
• United States v. ERB
  596 F.2d 412· 10th Cir.· 1979-04-06 ·cited 24×
• United States v. Agee
  597 F.2d 350· 3d Cir.· 1979-03-06 ·cited 24×
  The dissenting opinion argues that the defendant's conviction should be overturned due to improper references to his silence at the time of arrest and the trial court's prejudicial admonition regarding his right to remain silent.
• United States v. Parker
  586 F.2d 422· 5th Cir.· 1978-12-15 ·cited 24×
  The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the district court's in camera review procedures, while not ideal, did not constitute reversible error, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction despite witness credibility issues.
• United States v. Zepeda-Santana
  569 F.2d 1386· 5th Cir.· 1978-03-27 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in admitting hearsay testimony conditionally, questioning a witness, limiting cross-examination, refusing certain jury instructions, or allowing the jury to rehear a taped conversation.
• United States v. Ragghianti
  560 F.2d 1376· 9th Cir.· 1977-09-16 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in refusing to give a specific alibi instruction when the alibi evidence was weak and the jury was properly instructed on the government's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
• United States v. Weil
  561 F.2d 1109· 4th Cir.· 1977-08-02 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the defendant's assignments of error did not warrant overturning his conviction for aiding and abetting the passing of counterfeit currency.
• United States v. Nelson E. "Buck" Sanford
  547 F.2d 1085· 9th Cir.· 1976-12-23 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the indictment, reversing and remanding for further proceedings on all counts. The court found that the trespass statute applied to guides, Montana game laws applied on reservations, and the conspiracy charge was valid.
• United States v. Gamble
  541 F.2d 873· 10th Cir.· 1976-09-13 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the appellants on conspiracy and substantive counts, and that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of prior bad acts or in denying severance motions.
• United States v. Isobel Prince and Raymond Pandelli
  529 F.2d 1108· 6th Cir.· 1976-02-11 ·cited 24×
  The court held that Pandelli's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and consecutive sentences were permissible, while Prince's convictions under the Travel Act and for conspiracy were reversed due to insufficient proof of her knowledge or involvement in interstate ac
• United States v. Perkal
  530 F.2d 604· 4th Cir.· 1976-01-30 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the defendant's knowing participation in a fraudulent scheme, even if not the originator, and his reasonable foreseeability of mail use, were sufficient to convict him of mail fraud. The court also found that some counts merged due to single mailings.
• United States v. Valencia
  492 F.2d 1071· 9th Cir.· 1974-02-01 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the offenses of importation of narcotics and conspiracy to import narcotics are not identical, and consecutive sentences are permissible.
• United States v. Coppola
  486 F.2d 882· 10th Cir.· 1973-10-25 ·cited 24×
  The court held that a jury instruction on preponderance of the evidence, when viewed in the context of the entire charge, was harmless error, and that pretrial identification procedures were not impermissibly suggestive.
• Austin v. Erickson
  477 F.2d 620· 8th Cir.· 1973-04-20 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the joint representation of co-defendants by a single attorney created an actual conflict of interest that deprived the petitioner of her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
• United States v. Galardi
  476 F.2d 1072· 9th Cir.· 1973-04-04 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the exclusion in 18 U.S.C. § 2314 applies to falsely made, forged, or altered U.S. obligations, thus reversing convictions under that statute and related conspiracy charges. Other convictions were affirmed.
• United States v. Curran
  465 F.2d 260· 7th Cir.· 1972-07-20 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, as the evidence presented was not likely to produce a different verdict.
• United States v. Hill
  464 F.2d 1287· 8th Cir.· 1972-07-10 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish willful participation in the criminal venture, thus not meeting the standard for aiding and abetting.
• United States v. Gordon
  455 F.2d 398· 8th Cir.· 1972-02-09 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the appellant received a fair trial free of prejudicial error and affirmed the conviction.
• United States v. Wilson
  447 F.2d 1· 9th Cir.· 1971-08-16 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the search of the apartment was lawful, the gun was admissible evidence, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in calling a witness. The convictions are affirmed.
• Matthews v. United States
  449 F.2d 985· D.C. Cir.· 1971-03-04 ·cited 24×
  The court held that defense counsel's closing argument was prejudicial and undermined the defendant's only defense, constituting ineffective assistance of counsel.
• United States v. Singleton
  439 F.2d 381· 3d Cir.· 1971-03-02 ·cited 24×
  The court affirmed the judgment, finding that the search warrant was properly issued based on probable cause.
• United States v. Brookins
  434 F.2d 41· 5th Cir.· 1970-10-21 ·cited 24×
• United States v. Andrews
  427 F.2d 539· 5th Cir.· 1970-05-28 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for aiding and abetting an unlicensed distillery.
• United States v. Calarco
  424 F.2d 657· 2d Cir.· 1970-04-16 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the trial court erred in its jury instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, potentially violating due process by allowing hearsay to be used to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
• DeCARLO v. United States
  422 F.2d 237· 9th Cir.· 1970-02-10 ·cited 24×
  The court held that evidence of prior smuggling and marihuana use was admissible and that the appellants' other contentions, including self-incrimination and confrontation clause issues, were without merit.
• Williams v. United States
  418 F.2d 372· 10th Cir.· 1969-10-08 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the prosecutor's remarks did not coerce a witness, the jury instruction was proper, and the juror's non-disclosure did not warrant a new trial.
• United States v. Curley King
  402 F.2d 694· 9th Cir.· 1968-10-25 ·cited 24×
  The dissenting judge would affirm the lower court's finding that the defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the crime, knowing the money was stolen.
• United States v. Milby
  400 F.2d 702· 6th Cir.· 1968-09-25 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support convictions for assault with intent to commit sodomy and robbery, and that the sentence imposed was legal.
• United States v. Schwartz
  390 F.2d 1· 3d Cir.· 1968-02-23 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the admission of a prior inconsistent written statement as substantive evidence was error, and that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
• United States v. Ramsey
  374 F.2d 192· 2d Cir.· 1967-03-10 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the trial judge's jury instructions were adequate and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Root
  366 F.2d 377· 9th Cir.· 1966-08-26 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the indictment, finding that the indictment sufficiently alleged conspiracy, subornation of perjury, and obstruction of justice, and that the government was not required to set forth the exact false testimony verbatim.
• Miller v. Crouse
  346 F.2d 301· 10th Cir.· 1965-06-02 ·cited 24×
  The court held that a petitioner's illiteracy does not preclude a forgery conviction and that the record sufficiently shows the petitioner was aware of the charges and consequences through his counsel, thus denying a writ of habeas corpus without an evidentiary hearing was proper
• Glass v. United States
  328 F.2d 754· 7th Cir.· 1964-02-12 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying severance, allowing impeachment of the defendant with prior convictions, or in its jury instructions regarding aiding and abetting and comments on evidence.
• United States v. Rabinowitz
  327 F.2d 62· 6th Cir.· 1964-01-22 ·cited 24×
  The court affirmed the convictions, finding sufficient evidence of a scheme to defraud and conspiracy to violate mail fraud statutes.
• Vern Mac Thogmartin v. United States
  313 F.2d 589· 8th Cir.· 1963-02-05 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty on counts of transporting stolen securities in interstate commerce and conspiracy, and that the admission of certain evidence was proper.
• Stewart v. United States
  311 F.2d 109· 9th Cir.· 1962-11-29 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction, the admission of the appellant's statement was proper, the jury instructions were not erroneous, and the government counsel's closing argument was not prejudicial.
• Williams v. United States
  308 F.2d 664· 9th Cir.· 1962-10-03 ·cited 24×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict the appellants of aiding and abetting the transportation of a stolen vehicle, and that the testimony of an accomplice, while requiring caution, does not need corroboration in federal courts.
• United States v. Jackson
  256 F.2d 7· 2d Cir.· 1958-05-19 ·cited 24×
  The court held that a confession obtained during a 23-hour detention, without sleep or food, and with evidence of physical abuse, was involuntary and violated due process.
• Swanne Soon Young Pang v. United States
  209 F.2d 245· 9th Cir.· 1953-12-21 ·cited 24×
  The court held that instructing the jury on aiding and abetting was proper even if the indictment only charged the defendant as a principal, and that sufficient evidence supported the verdict.
• Bacon v. United States
  127 F.2d 985· 10th Cir.· 1942-05-06 ·cited 24×
  The court held that there was insufficient evidence to convict the defendant of conspiracy, but sufficient evidence to convict him of aiding and abetting the substantive offense of transporting intoxicating liquor into Oklahoma.
• KPMG LLP v. Cocchi
  565 U.S. 18· U.S.· 2011-11-07 ·cited 23×
  The Supreme Court vacated a Florida appellate decision that refused to compel arbitration of all claims against KPMG, holding that courts must separately analyze each claim in a complaint to determine arbitrability rather than refusing arbitration wholesale because some claims ar
• ARCH Aluminum & Glass Co., Inc. v. Haney
  964 So. 2d 228· Fla. 4th DCA· 2007-09-05 ·cited 23×
  Arch Aluminum sued Desert Glass Products and former employee Matthew Hale in Florida for misappropriation of trade secrets and related torts. The court affirmed dismissal of Desert Glass for lack of personal jurisdiction because it had no contacts with Florida and the tortious co
• Edner Michel and Fritz Joseph v. State
  752 So. 2d 6· Fla. 5th DCA· 2000-01-07 ·cited 23×
  Michel and Joseph appeal their vehicular homicide convictions arising from a fatal collision caused by their improperly equipped truck. The court affirmed, holding that a vehicle owner/passenger can be convicted as a principal for vehicular homicide based on procuring and permitt
• United States v. Perrone
  936 F.2d 1403· 2d Cir.· 1991-06-13 ·cited 23×
• United States v. Victoria-Peguero
  920 F.2d 77· 1st Cir.· 1990-11-27 ·cited 23×
  The court held that Puerto Rico police officers, properly cross-designated, can act as federal customs officers to conduct border searches, and that the specific search in this case was conducted under valid authorization.
• United States v. Gaskins
  849 F.2d 454· 9th Cir.· 1988-06-17 ·cited 23×
  The court held that the district court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 30, by giving an aiding and abetting instruction after stating it would not, prejudiced the defendant and required reversal of both counts.
• United States v. Nolan
  718 F.2d 589· 3d Cir.· 1983-09-30 ·cited 23×
  The court held that the seizure of evidence was lawful because exigent circumstances justified the unannounced entry, and that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions.
• State v. Lowery
  419 So. 2d 621· Fla.· 1982-07-29 ·cited 23×
  The Florida Supreme Court resolved a conflict between district court decisions regarding whether an accessory before the fact who was not physically present at a robbery must be acquitted of felony murder when a death occurs during the perpetration. The Court held that such an ac
• United States v. Mehrmanesh
  682 F.2d 1303· 9th Cir.· 1982-06-11 ·cited 23×
  The court held that the appellant could not be convicted of aiding and abetting the delivery of a sample if he did not participate in, plan, or know about it.
• United States v. Darrel Leon Burkhead
  646 F.2d 1283· 8th Cir.· 1981-04-21 ·cited 23×
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to rule in advance on the admissibility of prior convictions for impeachment, as this prevented the defendant from making an informed decision about testifying.