Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 164 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• United States v. Larson
  796 F.2d 244· 8th Cir.· 1986-07-22 ·cited 46×
  A conviction for concealing material facts under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 requires a duty to disclose, and absent such a duty, imposing criminal sanctions for structuring transactions to avoid reporting violates due process due to lack of fair warning.
• J.W. v. State
  467 So. 2d 796· Fla. 3d DCA· 1985-04-23 ·cited 46×
  A juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for burglary, criminal mischief, and possession of burglary tools based on circumstantial evidence that he was present at the crime scene and fled. The court reversed, finding insufficient evidence to establish he acted as an aider and abetto
• United States v. Jarrad
  754 F.2d 1451· 9th Cir.· 1985-03-04 ·cited 46×
  The court held that warrantless searches conducted by parole officers are permissible if reasonably believed necessary for their duties, and that prior identifications can be admitted under FRE 801(d)(1)(C) even if the witness denies them at trial, provided the witness is subject
• United States v. Cook
  745 F.2d 1311· 10th Cir.· 1984-10-09 ·cited 46×
  The court held that 31 U.S.C. § 5313 applies to individuals who cause financial institutions to file inaccurate Currency Transaction Reports, and that the district court did not err in amending the indictment or admitting evidence of subsequent conduct.
• Brumbley v. State
  453 So. 2d 381· Fla.· 1984-06-14 ·cited 46×
  Fred Lyman Brumbley appeals his conviction for first-degree murder and death sentence in the 1976 killing of Robert Clifton Rogers during a robbery. The Florida Supreme Court affirms the murder conviction under the felony murder rule but vacates the death sentence and remands for
• United States v. Garrett
  716 F.2d 257· 5th Cir.· 1983-09-19 ·cited 46×
• United States v. Freeze
  707 F.2d 132· 5th Cir.· 1983-05-31 ·cited 46×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for aiding and abetting possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, but declined to rule on the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal.
• A. Y. G. v. State
  414 So. 2d 1158· Fla. 3d DCA· 1982-06-08 ·cited 46×·via Aider And Abettor Liability
  A juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for burglary based on circumstantial evidence that she drove the getaway car after two males robbed a store. The court reversed, holding that the evidence was insufficient to establish the requisite intent to participate in the burglary as an
• United States v. Tashjian
  660 F.2d 829· 1st Cir.· 1981-09-30 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the joinder of counts was permissible under Rule 8(b) following the Supreme Court's clarification of RICO's scope, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying severance motions or in refusing to grant a new trial based on alleged prosecuto
• Stokes v. Lokken
  644 F.2d 779· 8th Cir.· 1981-07-07 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the lawyer's conduct did not rise to the level of scienter or substantial assistance required for aiding and abetting liability under federal securities laws, nor did it meet the 'seller' requirement for liability under § 12.
• United States v. Garrett Brock Trapnell and Martin Joseph McNally
  638 F.2d 1016· 7th Cir.· 1980-12-30 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support convictions for air piracy and kidnapping against McNally, reversing those convictions. For Trapnell, the court reversed the air piracy and kidnapping convictions and remanded for a new trial. Convictions for conspiracy
• United States v. Fried
  576 F.2d 787· 9th Cir.· 1978-05-12 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the search warrant affidavit was sufficient to establish probable cause and that post-arrest statements were admissible as non-hearsay. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Braunig
  553 F.2d 777· 2d Cir.· 1977-04-11 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the appellant waived the argument that notice of eviction was constitutionally deficient, and that the admission of similar act evidence and denial of the motion to dismiss mail fraud counts were proper.
• United States v. Frye
  548 F.2d 765· 8th Cir.· 1977-02-08 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support Frye's conviction for aiding and abetting the transportation of a forged security in interstate commerce, and that the denial of his motions for acquittal and a new trial, as well as the denial of his motion to suppress e
• United States v. Schilleci
  545 F.2d 519· 5th Cir.· 1977-01-17 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the relevance of the defendant's ignorance of the law to his specific intent and in giving a "Mann charge" that improperly shifted the burden of proof.
• The United States v. Camacho
  528 F.2d 464· 9th Cir.· 1976-01-05 ·cited 46×
  The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3) prohibits licensed dealers from selling firearms to aliens who do not reside in the state where the business is located, and that sufficient evidence supported convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting illegal firearms sales.
• United States v. Aloi
  511 F.2d 585· 2d Cir.· 1975-01-31 ·cited 46×
• United States v. Bryan
  483 F.2d 88· 3d Cir.· 1973-06-20 ·cited 46×
  The court held that a defendant convicted as an aider and abettor cannot be convicted if the named principal in the indictment has been acquitted of the substantive offense.
• United States v. Terrell
  474 F.2d 872· 2d Cir.· 1973-02-22 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict Green and Hilliard of aiding and abetting, but McDonald was entitled to a specific jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Terrell's claims regarding summation limitations were without merit.
• United States v. Rosenstein
  474 F.2d 705· 2d Cir.· 1973-01-26 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the admission of certain Liechtenstein documents was not reversible error, as they were admissible either as admissions by the defendants or as declarations of co-conspirators, despite not meeting the business records exception.
• United States v. Addington
  471 F.2d 560· 10th Cir.· 1973-01-08 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, collateral estoppel did not bar the prosecution, and the trial court did not err in denying motions related to the indictment, grand jury proceedings, or voir dire.
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. First Sec. Co. OF Chicago
  463 F.2d 981· 7th Cir.· 1972-04-12 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the securities firm is liable for the president's fraudulent escrow scheme under theories of apparent authority and violations of federal securities laws and NASD rules.
• United States v. Clayton
  450 F.2d 16· 1st Cir.· 1971-10-28 ·cited 46×
  The court held that consolidation of indictments for trial was proper, admission of co-conspirator hearsay statements did not violate the Sixth Amendment, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to impose sentence under NARA.
• Tora C. Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Ins. Co.
  450 F.2d 999· 7th Cir.· 1971-08-03 ·cited 46×
  The court held that movants, not being parties to the litigation, could not be bound by the judgment, and the judgment was a nullity as to them.
• United States v. Holt
  427 F.2d 1114· 8th Cir.· 1970-06-16 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt for possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun, and that the failure to give a requested accomplice instruction was not reversible error due to substantial corroborating evidence.
• Oertle v. United States
  370 F.2d 719· 10th Cir.· 1966-11-10 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in its jury instructions, its handling of the Jencks Act material, or its exclusion of certain evidence, and that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the jury's verdicts.
• Brennan v. United States
  240 F.2d 253· 8th Cir.· 1957-01-21 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty for conspiracy and violations of the Labor Management Relations Act, and that various procedural motions were properly denied.
• Metcalf v. United States
  195 F.2d 213· 6th Cir.· 1952-03-24 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the admission of certain statements and ledger notations, even if made after the conspiracy ended, was not prejudicial error due to timely objections, defense requests for their admission, or proper jury instructions.
• McNABB v. United States
  123 F.2d 848· 6th Cir.· 1941-12-06 ·cited 46×
  The court held that the admission of statements obtained during potentially coercive interrogations was permissible if the jury found them voluntary, and that the omission of two witnesses' names from the required list was harmless error. The court also affirmed that knowledge of
• United States v. Anderson
  809 F.2d 1281· 7th Cir.· 1987-01-09 ·cited 45×
  The court affirmed convictions for mail fraud, Hobbs Act, RICO, and tax evasion, finding sufficient evidence and proper joinder of counts. The court also held that a prior decision regarding sentencing councils should not be applied retroactively.
• United States v. Payseno
  782 F.2d 832· 9th Cir.· 1986-02-11 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the district court committed plain error by failing to provide a specific unanimity instruction when the evidence presented multiple distinct acts of extortion, creating a genuine possibility of jury confusion.
• United States v. McKENZIE
  768 F.2d 602· 5th Cir.· 1985-07-31 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the defendants' convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and that their claims regarding Brady/Jencks Act violations and prosecutorial misconduct were without merit.
• United States v. ARD
  731 F.2d 718· 11th Cir.· 1984-05-03 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the appellants' convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and that their various challenges, including those related to search and seizure, sufficiency of evidence, variance, conflict of interest, co-conspirator statements, cross-examination, presentat
• United States v. Mayo
  705 F.2d 62· 2d Cir.· 1983-04-08 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the defendants were not entitled to an entrapment defense because the government presented substantial evidence of their predisposition to commit the crimes, and they failed to offer sufficient contradictory evidence. Furthermore, one defendant's denial of inv
• United States v. Geno Pasquale Raffone
  693 F.2d 1343· 11th Cir.· 1982-12-20 ·cited 45×
  Convictions for conspiracy, possession with intent to distribute, and engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise are affirmed, as the evidence was sufficient and no reversible error occurred.
• United States v. Higginbotham
  539 F.2d 17· 9th Cir.· 1976-07-19 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the appellant's constitutional rights were preserved, and the conviction was affirmed.
• United States v. Diggs
  527 F.2d 509· 8th Cir.· 1975-12-30 ·cited 45×
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of guilt for transporting a forged security in interstate commerce.
• United States v. Sutherland
  463 F.2d 641· 5th Cir.· 1972-07-11 ·cited 45×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of conspiracy and robbery, and that the defendant received a fair trial despite claims of judicial bias and prejudicial publicity.
• Anderson v. State
  241 So. 2d 390· Fla.· 1970-11-12 ·cited 45×
  Anderson was convicted of rape and sentenced to death. On direct appeal, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed, rejecting arguments that denial of a preliminary hearing violated his rights, that his palm print was improperly obtained, that prejudicial hearsay was admitted, that disc
• Linden v. United States
  254 F.2d 560· 4th Cir.· 1958-04-09 ·cited 45×
  The court held that evidence of actual deception and the manner in which forms were presented was admissible and sufficient to sustain a conviction for mail fraud, even if the forms could be interpreted differently upon close reading.
• United States v. Moses
  220 F.2d 166· 3d Cir.· 1955-02-28 ·cited 45×
  A person cannot be convicted of aiding and abetting a narcotics sale if they merely introduced buyers to the seller and vouched for them at the buyers' request, without any association with the seller's enterprise or interest in the sale.
• Caldwell v. State
  50 Fla. 4· Fla.· 1905-06-01 ·cited 45×
  Caldwell and Larkins were convicted of first-degree murder in the death of N. W. Eppes and sentenced to hang. On appeal, they challenged the admission of hearsay statements from an accomplice and the sufficiency of alibi evidence, but the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the convic
• United States v. Morgan
  936 F.2d 1561· 10th Cir.· 1991-06-28 ·cited 44×
  A warrantless search of a bag thrown by an arrestee is unconstitutional if it is not abandoned, not incident to arrest due to remoteness, and not a valid inventory search due to lack of standardized procedures and investigative motive.
• United States v. Esparsen
  930 F.2d 1461· 10th Cir.· 1991-04-18 ·cited 44×
  The court affirmed jury convictions for cocaine distribution, upheld the trial court's finding of no prima facie case of discrimination in jury selection, and remanded for recalculation of a supervised release sentence.
• United States v. Carlton Bernard Brown
  903 F.2d 540· 8th Cir.· 1990-05-10 ·cited 44×
  The court affirmed the conviction but vacated the sentence, remanding for resentencing because the district court may have improperly believed it lacked authority to depart downward from the career offender guidelines.
• United States v. Dorsey
  819 F.2d 1055· 11th Cir.· 1987-06-22 ·cited 44×
  The court held that the denial of a severance motion was not an abuse of discretion, and the admission of extrinsic act evidence and a prosecutor's comment were not reversible error.
• United States v. Netz
  758 F.2d 1308· 8th Cir.· 1985-04-12 ·cited 44×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict for importing and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and that venue was proper in the Western District of Missouri.
• United States v. Wright
  742 F.2d 1215· 9th Cir.· 1984-09-18 ·cited 44×
  The court held that the district court erred in granting a judgment of acquittal for Stearns on the conspiracy charge, and that the jury's verdict of conviction on the lesser included offense should be reinstated. The court affirmed all other convictions.
• Llach v. United States
  739 F.2d 1322· 8th Cir.· 1984-07-23 ·cited 44×
  There was no prejudicial error committed on the voir dire in the present case, and the conviction should be affirmed.
• United States v. McCLURE
  734 F.2d 484· 10th Cir.· 1984-05-09 ·cited 44×
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying severance, discovery, or a specific jury instruction, and that the indictment was sufficient.