Aiding And Abetting Possession Of Marijuana With Intent To Distribute

29 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Regino Palacios
  556 F.2d 1359· 5th Cir.· 1977-08-08 ·cited 101×
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.
• United States v. Carter
  721 F.2d 1514· 11th Cir.· 1984-01-13 ·cited 94×
  The court held that tape-recorded conversations were admissible as co-conspirator hearsay and affirmed RICO conspiracy convictions, reversing only tax evasion convictions for Larry and Suzette Jackson.
• United States v. Rochan
  563 F.2d 1246· 5th Cir.· 1977-12-01 ·cited 86×
  Statements by the prosecutor and trial judge did not constitute an improper comment on the defendants' failure to testify, and authenticated transcripts of consensual tape recordings are admissible with participant testimony as to accuracy.
• United States v. Garrett
  727 F.2d 1003· 11th Cir.· 1984-03-02 ·cited 78×
  The court held that the disqualification of retained counsel was permissible under the Sixth Amendment, double jeopardy did not bar prosecution for continuing criminal enterprise after a conviction for a predicate offense, and the restriction of cross-examination was proper. Howe
• United States v. Butler
  611 F.2d 1066· 5th Cir.· 1980-02-14 ·cited 70×
  The court held that the jury selection process was constitutional, the warrantless arrests and seizures were lawful, the denial of severance was proper, and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions for conspiracy to possess marijuana and aiding and abetting possessi
• United States v. Lindell
  881 F.2d 1313· 5th Cir.· 1989-08-17 ·cited 56×
  The court affirmed the convictions, finding no reversible error in the joinder of defendants, evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, sufficiency of evidence, sentencing, or miscellaneous claims.
• United States v. Normandeau
  800 F.2d 953· 9th Cir.· 1986-09-25 ·cited 49×
  The court held that knowledge of the quantity of marijuana is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), and that a warrantless search of a vehicle is permissible if supported by probable cause.
• United States v. Freeze
  707 F.2d 132· 5th Cir.· 1983-05-31 ·cited 46×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for aiding and abetting possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, but declined to rule on the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal.
• United States v. Gomez
  776 F.2d 542· 5th Cir.· 1985-10-08 ·cited 40×
  The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions of Antonio Reyes Espinoza for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and aiding and abetting the substantive offense.
• United States v. DOE
  860 F.2d 488· 1st Cir.· 1988-10-27 ·cited 32×
  The court held that the admission of hearsay evidence regarding Honduran government authorization for boarding was proper under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(24), and prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments, while improper, did not constitute reversible error given the o
• United States v. Ward
  696 F.2d 1315· 11th Cir.· 1983-02-03 ·cited 32×
  The court held that Prows' appeal must be remanded for the district court to determine excusable neglect for his late filing, and that Ward's double jeopardy and due process claims lack merit.
• United States v. Elkins
  774 F.2d 530· 1st Cir.· 1985-10-09 ·cited 25×
  The dissenting judge argues that the majority erred in finding plain error and in distinguishing between defendants regarding the harmlessness of the error.
• United States v. Vasquez
  953 F.2d 176· 5th Cir.· 1992-01-23 ·cited 22×
  The court held that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry into the residence and that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendants' convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute marijuana.
• United States v. Petz
  764 F.2d 1390· 11th Cir.· 1985-07-05 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the record did not clearly establish an unequivocal waiver of the right to conflict-free counsel, deferring the issue to a collateral proceeding.
• United States v. Posner
  865 F.2d 654· 5th Cir.· 1989-02-02 ·cited 18×
  The court held that evidence of subsequent marijuana transactions was admissible to show predisposition for cocaine charges, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conspiracy conviction. However, the imposition of a supervised release term was improper.
• United States v. Rodarte
  596 F.2d 141· 5th Cir.· 1979-06-04 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The court also found no reversible error in the admission of evidence of a prior foreign conviction
• United States v. Adan Chavez
  947 F.2d 742· 5th Cir.· 1991-11-08 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the appellants' convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting drug possession with intent to distribute, and that the district court's upward adjustment of Campos's sentence for being an organizer was not clearly err
• United States v. Tersea Adela Ashby
  864 F.2d 690· 10th Cir.· 1988-12-29 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the denial of the motion to suppress, the admission of documents as circumstantial evidence, the jury instructions, and the handling of a juror conversation were not erroneous, and the evidence was sufficient for conviction.
• United States v. Stowell
  947 F.2d 1251· 5th Cir.· 1991-11-15 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict Tucker of conspiracy and aiding and abetting, but that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the issue of multiple conspiracies for Wood.
• United States v. Henry
  698 F.2d 1172· 11th Cir.· 1983-02-22 ·cited 11×
  The court held that continuances granted at the defendant's request, based on findings that the ends of justice outweighed the public's and defendant's interest in a speedy trial, are excludable from the Speedy Trial Act's time computation.
• United States v. Caves
  890 F.2d 87· 8th Cir.· 1989-11-22 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the warrantless roadside search of the vehicle was permissible under the automobile exception due to probable cause, the station house search warrant was sufficiently particular, and the inventory searches of the purse were lawful.
• United States v. del Prado-Montero
  740 F.2d 113· 1st Cir.· 1984-08-08 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendants of possessing marijuana with intent to distribute, and that their sentences and the seizure of the vessel were valid.
• Gov't OF the Canal Zone v. Sixto O'Calagan C. (Cerezo)
  580 F.2d 161· 5th Cir.· 1978-09-14 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for aiding and abetting possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and that the district court had jurisdiction.
• United States v. Corpus
  882 F.2d 546· 1st Cir.· 1989-08-08 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions for aiding and abetting drug possession with intent to distribute, and that no due process violation occurred regarding the destruction of evidence.
• United States v. Steuben
  850 F.2d 859· 1st Cir.· 1988-07-11 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the captain (Steuben) and a key crew member (Neiro) of aiding and abetting drug possession and importation, but insufficient for the mechanic (Caro) and a regular seaman (Salazar).
• United States v. Clifford
  979 F.2d 896· 1st Cir.· 1992-11-20 ·cited 4×
  The court held that circumstantial evidence, though thin, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict for conspiracy and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute marijuana.
• United States v. Moorman
  660 F.2d 106· 4th Cir.· 1981-09-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions for importation and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and that the trial court did not err in denying motions for judgments of acquittal.
• United States v. Larsen
  952 F.2d 1099· 9th Cir.· 1991-12-20 ·cited 2×
  The court held that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) has extraterritorial jurisdiction, as congressional intent can be inferred from the nature of illegal drug trafficking.
• United States v. DOE
  921 F.2d 340· 1st Cir.· 1990-12-13 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict for aiding and abetting marijuana possession with intent to distribute, and that the sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines was not appealable.