Affirmance Of Judgment

34 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station Wqba
  731 So. 2d 638· Fla.· 1999-02-04 ·cited 794×
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed the Third District Court of Appeal's decision that allowed Three Kings Parade to recover settlement funds from the Dade County School Board based on equitable subrogation, a doctrine never pled before trial. The court held that equitable subroga
• Ronald v. State ex rel. John S. Harris
  113 Fla. 859· Fla.· 1934-02-05 ·cited 28×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment, finding the appeal frivolous and without merit. The court considered a motion to quash proceedings in error and, after reviewing the record and briefs, determined the judgment was free from error.
• The Grand Lodge v. Daisy Good all Stroud
  107 Fla. 152· Fla.· 1932-10-24 ·cited 24×
  The Florida Supreme Court denied a motion to quash a writ of error, finding no reversible error in the lower court's proceedings after reviewing the record. The court affirmed the judgment based on established legal principles.
• Baskin v. Klemm
  118 Fla. 662· Fla.· 1935-03-06 ·cited 22×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment in a companion case, allowing respondents to apply to spread a levy over two or more years, subject to court approval and potential review.
• Hancock v. Morton and Thelma S. McDONALD and William Wilmer Frost, Jr.
  148 So. 2d 56· Fla. 1st DCA· 1963-01-03 ·cited 19×
  In this wrongful death appeal, the administratrix of a deceased boy's estate challenged a jury verdict for the defendants in a case arising from a motor vehicle collision. The court affirmed the judgment, holding that the trial court properly excluded impeachment testimony based
• Kulhanjian v. Moomjian
  105 So. 2d 783· Fla.· 1958-10-17 ·cited 18×
  The court held that a partial reversal of a decree requiring an accounting and entry of a new decree is not an affirmance that obligates the surety on a supersedeas bond conditioned to satisfy the original decree or its modification.
• Proctor v. Gissendaner
  587 F.2d 182· 5th Cir.· 1979-01-02 ·cited 16×
  The Alabama statute providing for a 10% penalty on affirmed judgments with supersedeas bonds is applicable in diversity cases via the Erie doctrine.
• Emmett Washington v. State
  48 Fla. 62· Fla.· 1904-06-01 ·cited 14×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment because the appellant failed to present a valid bill of exceptions within the legally prescribed time. Without a proper bill of exceptions, no errors could be considered on appeal.
• Denmark v. State
  43 Fla. 182· Fla.· 1901-01-01 ·cited 14×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a first-degree murder conviction, holding that a defendant waives the right to challenge a juror who was also on the grand jury that indicted him if the challenge is not made before the verdict. The court found the evidence sufficient and other
• Francois v. State
  198 So. 2d 360· Fla. 3d DCA· 1967-05-10 ·cited 10×
  This case involves a procedural reversal where the Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District, vacated its prior judgment and affirmed the lower court's decision, following a mandate from the Florida Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had quashed the appellate court's initial
• Horn v. State
  40 Fla. 472· Fla.· 1898-06-01 ·cited 8×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment because the appellant's bill of exceptions was not timely filed, rendering it invalid. Without a valid bill of exceptions, no errors could be considered on appeal.
• Owen v. State
  58 Fla. 84· Fla.· 1909-06-01 ·cited 6×
  R. H. Owen was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. On appeal, Owen filed a writ of error but then sought dismissal just before the return date, prompting the State to move for affirmance. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding Owen's tacti
• Nova v. State
  362 So. 2d 973· Fla. 3d DCA· 1978-09-08 ·cited 4×
• Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Williams
  125 So. 2d 107· Fla. 1st DCA· 1960-12-09 ·cited 4×
  The court granted a motion to quash an appeal, deeming it frivolous or for delay, because the underlying judgment being garnished was affirmed. Although the garnishment proceeding itself was dismissed in a related case, this appeal's motion to quash was granted based on the affir
• Dade Cnty. v. Kerce
  137 Fla. 194· Fla.· 1938-10-05 ·cited 3×
  Dade County sought to dissolve an injunction that restrained distribution of state gasoline tax funds under Chapter 17974, Acts of 1937. The Florida Supreme Court, evenly divided with three justices favoring affirmance and three favoring reversal, affirmed the lower court's denia
• Wiles v. State
  159 Fla. 638· Fla.· 1947-10-31 ·cited 2×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a first-degree murder conviction and death sentence, finding that all issues raised on appeal had been previously decided by the court adversely to the appellant. The court also reviewed the evidence to ensure the interests of justice did not re
• Fortiline
  Del.· 2026-02-10 ·cited 1×
  Fortiline, Inc. appealed a Court of Chancery judgment in a dispute against multiple defendants. The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning articulated in the Chancery Court's memorandum opinion.
• The Fla. Dep't of Corrections/Division of Risk Mgmt. v. Bannon
  Fla. 1st DCA· 2026-03-20
• Goldman
  Del.· 2026-01-29
  The trial court's judgment is affirmed on the bases stated in its Post Trial Opinion.
• Nuvasive, Inc. v. Miles
  Del.· 2026-01-16
  The judgment of the Court of Chancery is affirmed, indicating that the lower court's decision was legally and factually correct.
• Sullivan
  Del.· 2026-01-09
  The Family Court's judgment is affirmed based on the reasoning set forth in its July 8, 2025 order.
• Walker v. State of Del.
  Del.· 2026-01-06
  The Superior Court's judgment is affirmed where the trial court's May 23, 2025 order provides adequate legal and factual basis for the decision.
• Generoso Lleo v. State
  241 So. 3d 768· Fla. 1st DCA· 2018-02-14
• Gancedo v. DEL Carpio
  17 So. 3d 843· Fla. 4th DCA· 2009-08-26
  A married person whose spouse is the borrower on a note secured by a mortgage on marital property is a 'consumer' entitled to TILA disclosures under Regulation Z § 226.2(a)(11) if that person has homestead rights in the property, because such homestead rights constitute an 'owner
• City OF Miami v. Spicy
  284 So. 2d 699· Fla. 3d DCA· 1973-11-14
• Nat'l Union Indem. Co. v. Turner Hodges
  251 So. 2d 894· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-09-16
• Roman v. State
  244 So. 2d 442· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-01-05
• Stetzler v. State
  244 So. 2d 443· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-01-05
• Garcia v. State
  244 So. 2d 443· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-01-05
• Hahn v. Mitchel Mark
  177 So. 2d 374· Fla. 3d DCA· 1965-07-21
  This case involves the Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District, reinstating a prior circuit court judgment after the Florida Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's previous reversal. The Supreme Court directed the reinstatement of the circuit court's judgment, leadi
• Riley v. Corbett
  139 Fla. 327· Fla.· 1939-07-18
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment on a promissory note, finding the judgment to be supported by ample evidence and free from error after reviewing the record and briefs.
• Olive Stengel v. Chapman
  109 Fla. 23· Fla.· 1933-03-13
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment after finding no reversible error upon reviewing the record, despite a motion to dismiss the appeal due to non-compliance with brief preparation rules.
• Fla. Asphalt Block Paving Co. v. Davis
  97 Fla. 390· Fla.· 1929-03-26
  Florida Asphalt Block Paving Company appealed a judgment in favor of Robert Lee Davis, challenging the procedural validity of the bill of exceptions. The Florida Supreme Court denied the motion to strike the transcript and conditionally affirmed the judgment, allowing Davis 30 da
• Ryan v. State
  96 Fla. 17· Fla.· 1928-06-14
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment due to an equal division among the justices, a situation where the court's precedent dictates affirmation.