Admonition To Jury

59 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• United States v. Schmidt
  572 F.2d 206· 9th Cir.· 1977-11-11 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for a new trial based on references to prior incarceration, nor in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal based on the government's proof of sanity.
• United States v. Haynes
  466 F.2d 1260· 5th Cir.· 1972-09-25 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the prosecutor's inflammatory cross-examination and remark, 'Burn, baby, burn,' deprived the defendant of a fair trial, even though the evidence might have been sufficient to support a conviction.
• Benscoter v. The United States
  376 F.2d 49· 10th Cir.· 1967-04-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the supplemental jury instructions, while approaching permissible limits, were not coercive given the context and assurances to the jury regarding their right to maintain honest convictions.
• Emery v. United States
  127 F.2d 561· 8th Cir.· 1942-04-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial or his motion for a directed verdict, and that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.
• United States v. Schindler
  614 F.2d 227· 9th Cir.· 1980-02-25 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the prosecutor's conduct, while imprudent, did not rise to the level of prejudice requiring reversal of the conviction.
• United States v. Perez
  489 F.2d 93· 5th Cir.· 1974-02-06 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in allowing amendments to the bill of particulars, admitting certain testimony, or in its handling of disclosure issues, and that sufficient proof of substantial profit was presented.
• Campfield v. State
  189 So. 2d 642· Fla. 2d DCA· 1966-08-31 ·cited 2×
  Roland Campfield was convicted of robbery after trial with a co-defendant. He appealed on grounds that the trial court erred in admitting his co-defendant's confession at trial and in denying his motion for severance. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no revers
• United States v. Heron Green
  487 F.2d 1022· 5th Cir.· 1973-11-27
  The court held that the trial judge's instruction to the jury to disregard defense counsel's argument, which went outside the record, was not prejudicial error.
• Beulah B. Crowell v. Merrill Fink
  135 So. 2d 766· Fla. 1st DCA· 1961-12-19
  In this motor vehicle accident tort case, the plaintiff appealed from an adverse judgment, challenging the trial court's denial of her motion for mistrial and an allegedly erroneous jury instruction. The appellate court reversed and remanded for a new trial, finding that testimon