Administrative Findings

80 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Kisco Co., Inc. v. The United States
  610 F.2d 742· Ct. Cl.· 1979-11-14 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the April 7, 1970 notice, while procedurally defective for a default termination, must be treated as a partial termination for the convenience of the Government. The court reversed the Secretary's decision regarding Count I.
• Bevis v. State Bd. OF Funeral Directors & Embalmers
  279 So. 2d 339· Fla. 1st DCA· 1973-06-12 ·cited 2×
  Bevis challenged administrative orders from the State Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers that placed his funeral home on probation and revoked its apprentice training agency status. The court found the Board's findings of fact unsupported by evidence, as the complained-of c
• Louie C. Wingo v. Washington
  395 F.2d 633· D.C. Cir.· 1968-05-02 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the administrative agency's decision to deny disability retirement benefits was not supported by adequate findings of fact and required remand for reconsideration.
• Aiken v. Cogswell
  201 F.2d 705· D.C. Cir.· 1952-11-28 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Rent Administrator, having intervened in the trial court, could appeal the judgment, and that the Administrator's prior findings of fact were binding.
• Bellaskus v. Crossman
  164 F.2d 412· 5th Cir.· 1947-12-02 ·cited 2×
  The court should have inquired whether there was any lawful reason for deporting the alien to Greece.
• Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. Bowles
  151 F.2d 345· Emer. Ct. App.· 1945-10-05 ·cited 2×
  The court should declare a regulation invalid as of the amendment's effective date if it lacks a required essential finding.
• Flores v. Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc.
  131 F.2d 310· 2d Cir.· 1942-11-02 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Deputy Commissioner's finding of partial disability, with a reduced earning capacity, was supported by substantial evidence and within his discretion, and thus the district court erred in restoring the larger award.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hribar Trucking, Inc.
  337 F.2d 414· 7th Cir.· 1964-10-01 ·cited 1×
  The dissenting judge would have enforced the Board's order to reinstate the employee.
• Sorrentini v. Soc. Sec. Admin.
  N.D. Fla.· 2020-10-30
  The court affirmed the Commissioner's decision, finding substantial evidence supported the ALJ's discounting of the treating physician's opinion.
• Carroll v. City of Orlando
  9th Cir. Ct. App. Div.· 2015-11-03
  Joseph Michael Carroll appeals a red light camera violation citation issued by the City of Orlando. The appellate court affirms the hearing officer's determination that Carroll's vehicle ran a red light, rejecting Carroll's arguments regarding metadata disclosure and the evidence
• Paramount Transp. Sys. v. Chauffeurs
  529 F.2d 1284· 9th Cir.· 1976-01-27
  The court held that the district court did not err in admitting and submitting Finding of Fact E to the jury, as it was conclusive on the issue of unlawful strike activities, but not on the proximate cause of damages.
• United States v. Tyson
  503 F.2d 1368· 5th Cir.· 1974-11-15
  The court held that a mere difference of medical opinion is insufficient to overturn a Selective Service classification, and the government showed a basis in fact for finding the defendant qualified.
• Bailey v. Fla. Real Est. Comm'n & Cornelius L. Reagan
  221 So. 2d 441· Fla. 4th DCA· 1969-04-11
  Bailey sought certiorari to review a Florida Real Estate Commission order suspending his broker registration for allegedly making a false affidavit. The court granted certiorari and quashed the suspension, finding insufficient evidence that Bailey knowingly and falsely swore when
• Indus. Union Dep't, AFL-CIO v. Barber-Colman Co.
  348 F.2d 787· D.C. Cir.· 1965-06-21
  The court held that the Secretary's determination of two minimum wages was not adequately supported by findings and remanded for further proceedings, without deciding the ultimate authority to set multiple wages.
• Dixie Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Holland
  269 F.2d 495· 6th Cir.· 1959-07-07
  The court held that there was substantial evidence to support the Deputy Commissioner's finding that the employee's death arose out of and in the course of employment, entitling the widow to compensation.
• Allentown Broad. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  232 F.2d 57· D.C. Cir.· 1955-12-16
• Fed. Liquidating Corp. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n
  187 F.2d 804· 2d Cir.· 1951-03-16
• Cudahy Bros. Co. v. Bowles
  148 F.2d 826· Emer. Ct. App.· 1945-04-11
  The court held that the price regulation was not unlawfully discriminatory, as the established price differential and fill practice prohibition were supported by evidence and administrative findings.